Prospective cohort study of voice outcomes following secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in gastric pull-up reconstruction after total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy

Abstract Background Gastric pull-up is a reconstructive option for circumferential defects after resection of advanced laryngopharyngeal malignancy. Voice loss is expected and vocal rehabilitation remains a challenge. Our study objectives were to investigate the feasibility of secondary tracheoesoph...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emily C. Deane, Harman Parhar, Linda Rammage, Amanda Hu, Donald W. Anderson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-03-01
Series:Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00492-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832568856892145664
author Emily C. Deane
Harman Parhar
Linda Rammage
Amanda Hu
Donald W. Anderson
author_facet Emily C. Deane
Harman Parhar
Linda Rammage
Amanda Hu
Donald W. Anderson
author_sort Emily C. Deane
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Gastric pull-up is a reconstructive option for circumferential defects after resection of advanced laryngopharyngeal malignancy. Voice loss is expected and vocal rehabilitation remains a challenge. Our study objectives were to investigate the feasibility of secondary tracheoesophageal puncture following gastric pull-up and to analyze voice outcomes. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of patients with advanced laryngopharyngeal malignancies who underwent gastric pull-up and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture between 1988 and 2017 at a tertiary-care academic institution. Objective acoustic measures included fundamental frequency and vocal intensity. Perceptual analysis was performed using voice recordings (“Rainbow Passage”) randomly presented in a blinded fashion to four clinicians using the validated GRBAS scale. Speech intelligibility was assessed in a blinded fashion using a validated 7-point scale. Additionally, the Voice Handicap Index-10 was administered as a validated patient self-reporting tool. Results Ten patients (7 male, 3 female) were included, all of whom preferentially used tracheoesophageal puncture for communication. These patients had abnormal median fundamental frequency of 250 (interquartile range (IQR) 214–265) Hz and a limited median vocal intensity of 65.8 (IQR 64.1–68.3) dB. Perceptual analysis (GRBAS) revealed a median ‘moderate’ degree of impairment [grade 2 (IQR 2–3), roughness 2 (IQR 2–3), breathiness 3 (IQR 2–3), asthenia 2 (IQR 1–2), strain 2 (IQR 1–2)] as did median intelligibility scores [median 5 (IQR 4–7)]. Most patients self-reported an abnormal voice handicap-10 [median 26.5 (IQR 22.8–35.0)]. Conclusion Secondary tracheoesophageal puncture is a safe and feasible option for voice rehabilitation after gastric pull-up. Although analyses demonstrated moderate subjective and objective impairment, tracheoesophageal puncture provided patients with a self-reported means of functional verbal communication and was their preferred method of communication. Graphical abstract
format Article
id doaj-art-90553b239ab3435bb77cbcf7fc9c0c38
institution Kabale University
issn 1916-0216
language English
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
spelling doaj-art-90553b239ab3435bb77cbcf7fc9c0c382025-02-03T00:22:58ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery1916-02162021-03-015011810.1186/s40463-021-00492-3Prospective cohort study of voice outcomes following secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in gastric pull-up reconstruction after total laryngopharyngoesophagectomyEmily C. Deane0Harman Parhar1Linda Rammage2Amanda Hu3Donald W. Anderson4Division of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British ColumbiaDivision of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British ColumbiaDivision of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British ColumbiaDivision of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British ColumbiaDivision of Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British ColumbiaAbstract Background Gastric pull-up is a reconstructive option for circumferential defects after resection of advanced laryngopharyngeal malignancy. Voice loss is expected and vocal rehabilitation remains a challenge. Our study objectives were to investigate the feasibility of secondary tracheoesophageal puncture following gastric pull-up and to analyze voice outcomes. Methods This was a prospective cohort study of patients with advanced laryngopharyngeal malignancies who underwent gastric pull-up and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture between 1988 and 2017 at a tertiary-care academic institution. Objective acoustic measures included fundamental frequency and vocal intensity. Perceptual analysis was performed using voice recordings (“Rainbow Passage”) randomly presented in a blinded fashion to four clinicians using the validated GRBAS scale. Speech intelligibility was assessed in a blinded fashion using a validated 7-point scale. Additionally, the Voice Handicap Index-10 was administered as a validated patient self-reporting tool. Results Ten patients (7 male, 3 female) were included, all of whom preferentially used tracheoesophageal puncture for communication. These patients had abnormal median fundamental frequency of 250 (interquartile range (IQR) 214–265) Hz and a limited median vocal intensity of 65.8 (IQR 64.1–68.3) dB. Perceptual analysis (GRBAS) revealed a median ‘moderate’ degree of impairment [grade 2 (IQR 2–3), roughness 2 (IQR 2–3), breathiness 3 (IQR 2–3), asthenia 2 (IQR 1–2), strain 2 (IQR 1–2)] as did median intelligibility scores [median 5 (IQR 4–7)]. Most patients self-reported an abnormal voice handicap-10 [median 26.5 (IQR 22.8–35.0)]. Conclusion Secondary tracheoesophageal puncture is a safe and feasible option for voice rehabilitation after gastric pull-up. Although analyses demonstrated moderate subjective and objective impairment, tracheoesophageal puncture provided patients with a self-reported means of functional verbal communication and was their preferred method of communication. Graphical abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00492-3Gastric pull-upLaryngopharyngoesophagectomyVoiceQuality of life
spellingShingle Emily C. Deane
Harman Parhar
Linda Rammage
Amanda Hu
Donald W. Anderson
Prospective cohort study of voice outcomes following secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in gastric pull-up reconstruction after total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Gastric pull-up
Laryngopharyngoesophagectomy
Voice
Quality of life
title Prospective cohort study of voice outcomes following secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in gastric pull-up reconstruction after total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy
title_full Prospective cohort study of voice outcomes following secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in gastric pull-up reconstruction after total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy
title_fullStr Prospective cohort study of voice outcomes following secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in gastric pull-up reconstruction after total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy
title_full_unstemmed Prospective cohort study of voice outcomes following secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in gastric pull-up reconstruction after total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy
title_short Prospective cohort study of voice outcomes following secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in gastric pull-up reconstruction after total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy
title_sort prospective cohort study of voice outcomes following secondary tracheoesophageal puncture in gastric pull up reconstruction after total laryngopharyngoesophagectomy
topic Gastric pull-up
Laryngopharyngoesophagectomy
Voice
Quality of life
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-021-00492-3
work_keys_str_mv AT emilycdeane prospectivecohortstudyofvoiceoutcomesfollowingsecondarytracheoesophagealpunctureingastricpullupreconstructionaftertotallaryngopharyngoesophagectomy
AT harmanparhar prospectivecohortstudyofvoiceoutcomesfollowingsecondarytracheoesophagealpunctureingastricpullupreconstructionaftertotallaryngopharyngoesophagectomy
AT lindarammage prospectivecohortstudyofvoiceoutcomesfollowingsecondarytracheoesophagealpunctureingastricpullupreconstructionaftertotallaryngopharyngoesophagectomy
AT amandahu prospectivecohortstudyofvoiceoutcomesfollowingsecondarytracheoesophagealpunctureingastricpullupreconstructionaftertotallaryngopharyngoesophagectomy
AT donaldwanderson prospectivecohortstudyofvoiceoutcomesfollowingsecondarytracheoesophagealpunctureingastricpullupreconstructionaftertotallaryngopharyngoesophagectomy