Locke’s Composition Principle and the Argument for God’s Immateriality
Locke’s argument for God’s immateriality in Essay IV x is usually interpreted as involving a principle that in some way prohibits the causation of thought by matter. I reject these causal readings in favor of one that involves a principle which says a thinking being cannot be composed out of unthink...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Aperio
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Modern Philosophy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jmphil.org/article/id/2013/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832575962900856832 |
|---|---|
| author | Tyler Hanck |
| author_facet | Tyler Hanck |
| author_sort | Tyler Hanck |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Locke’s argument for God’s immateriality in Essay IV x is usually interpreted as involving a principle that in some way prohibits the causation of thought by matter. I reject these causal readings in favor of one that involves a principle which says a thinking being cannot be composed out of unthinking parts. This Composition Principle, as I call it, is crucial to understanding how Locke’s theistic argument can succeed in the face of his skepticism about the substance of matter and the cause of thought, as well as his belief in the possibility of thinking matter. It also explains why Locke held the soul’s immateriality to be highly probable. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-902707be60bc40bf85f95b76a88feb05 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2644-0652 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Aperio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Modern Philosophy |
| spelling | doaj-art-902707be60bc40bf85f95b76a88feb052025-01-31T16:08:30ZengAperioJournal of Modern Philosophy2644-06522022-01-014010.25894/jmp.2013Locke’s Composition Principle and the Argument for God’s ImmaterialityTyler Hanck0University of Illinois at ChicagoLocke’s argument for God’s immateriality in Essay IV x is usually interpreted as involving a principle that in some way prohibits the causation of thought by matter. I reject these causal readings in favor of one that involves a principle which says a thinking being cannot be composed out of unthinking parts. This Composition Principle, as I call it, is crucial to understanding how Locke’s theistic argument can succeed in the face of his skepticism about the substance of matter and the cause of thought, as well as his belief in the possibility of thinking matter. It also explains why Locke held the soul’s immateriality to be highly probable.https://jmphil.org/article/id/2013/LockeThinking MatterMaterialismSoulComposition |
| spellingShingle | Tyler Hanck Locke’s Composition Principle and the Argument for God’s Immateriality Journal of Modern Philosophy Locke Thinking Matter Materialism Soul Composition |
| title | Locke’s Composition Principle and the Argument for God’s Immateriality |
| title_full | Locke’s Composition Principle and the Argument for God’s Immateriality |
| title_fullStr | Locke’s Composition Principle and the Argument for God’s Immateriality |
| title_full_unstemmed | Locke’s Composition Principle and the Argument for God’s Immateriality |
| title_short | Locke’s Composition Principle and the Argument for God’s Immateriality |
| title_sort | locke s composition principle and the argument for god s immateriality |
| topic | Locke Thinking Matter Materialism Soul Composition |
| url | https://jmphil.org/article/id/2013/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tylerhanck lockescompositionprincipleandtheargumentforgodsimmateriality |