Alterations Induced by Bangerter Filters on the Visual Field: A Frequency Doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Study

Purpose. To investigate the effects of Bangerter filters on the visual field in healthy and in amblyopic patients. Materials and Methods. Fifteen normal adults and fifteen anisometropic amblyopia patients were analysed with standard automated perimetry (SAP) and frequency doubling technology (FDT) a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Costantino Schiavi, Filippo Tassi, Alessandro Finzi, Mauro Cellini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/909848
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832549113151881216
author Costantino Schiavi
Filippo Tassi
Alessandro Finzi
Mauro Cellini
author_facet Costantino Schiavi
Filippo Tassi
Alessandro Finzi
Mauro Cellini
author_sort Costantino Schiavi
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. To investigate the effects of Bangerter filters on the visual field in healthy and in amblyopic patients. Materials and Methods. Fifteen normal adults and fifteen anisometropic amblyopia patients were analysed with standard automated perimetry (SAP) and frequency doubling technology (FDT) at baseline and with filters 0.8 and 0.1. Results. With 0.1 filter in SAP there was an increase of MD compared with controls (−10.24 ± 1.09 dB) in either the amblyopic (−11.34 ± 2.06 dB; P<0.050) or sound eyes (−11.34 ± 1.66 dB; P<0.030). With filters 0.8 the PSD was increased in the amblyopic eyes (2.09 ± 0.70 dB; P<0.007) and in the sound eyes (1.92 ± 0.29 dB; P<0.004) compared with controls. The FDT-PSD values in the control group were increased with the interposition of the filters compared to baseline (0.8; P<0.0004 and 0.1; P<0.0010). We did not find significant differences of the baseline PSD between amblyopic eyes (3.80 ± 2.21 dB) and the sound eyes (4.33 ± 1.31 dB) and when comparing the filters 0.8 (4.55 ± 1.50 versus 4.53 ± 1.76 dB) and 0.1 (4.66 ± 1.80 versus 5.10 ± 2.04 dB). Conclusions. The use of Bangerter filters leads to a reduction of the functionality of the magno- and parvocellular pathway.
format Article
id doaj-art-9006b80b51d64df186bdb6d92aa53c16
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language English
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-9006b80b51d64df186bdb6d92aa53c162025-02-03T06:12:09ZengWileyJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582015-01-01201510.1155/2015/909848909848Alterations Induced by Bangerter Filters on the Visual Field: A Frequency Doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry StudyCostantino Schiavi0Filippo Tassi1Alessandro Finzi2Mauro Cellini3Department of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, Ophthalmology Service, University of Bologna, 40100 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, Ophthalmology Service, University of Bologna, 40100 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, Ophthalmology Service, University of Bologna, 40100 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine, Ophthalmology Service, University of Bologna, 40100 Bologna, ItalyPurpose. To investigate the effects of Bangerter filters on the visual field in healthy and in amblyopic patients. Materials and Methods. Fifteen normal adults and fifteen anisometropic amblyopia patients were analysed with standard automated perimetry (SAP) and frequency doubling technology (FDT) at baseline and with filters 0.8 and 0.1. Results. With 0.1 filter in SAP there was an increase of MD compared with controls (−10.24 ± 1.09 dB) in either the amblyopic (−11.34 ± 2.06 dB; P<0.050) or sound eyes (−11.34 ± 1.66 dB; P<0.030). With filters 0.8 the PSD was increased in the amblyopic eyes (2.09 ± 0.70 dB; P<0.007) and in the sound eyes (1.92 ± 0.29 dB; P<0.004) compared with controls. The FDT-PSD values in the control group were increased with the interposition of the filters compared to baseline (0.8; P<0.0004 and 0.1; P<0.0010). We did not find significant differences of the baseline PSD between amblyopic eyes (3.80 ± 2.21 dB) and the sound eyes (4.33 ± 1.31 dB) and when comparing the filters 0.8 (4.55 ± 1.50 versus 4.53 ± 1.76 dB) and 0.1 (4.66 ± 1.80 versus 5.10 ± 2.04 dB). Conclusions. The use of Bangerter filters leads to a reduction of the functionality of the magno- and parvocellular pathway.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/909848
spellingShingle Costantino Schiavi
Filippo Tassi
Alessandro Finzi
Mauro Cellini
Alterations Induced by Bangerter Filters on the Visual Field: A Frequency Doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Study
Journal of Ophthalmology
title Alterations Induced by Bangerter Filters on the Visual Field: A Frequency Doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Study
title_full Alterations Induced by Bangerter Filters on the Visual Field: A Frequency Doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Study
title_fullStr Alterations Induced by Bangerter Filters on the Visual Field: A Frequency Doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Study
title_full_unstemmed Alterations Induced by Bangerter Filters on the Visual Field: A Frequency Doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Study
title_short Alterations Induced by Bangerter Filters on the Visual Field: A Frequency Doubling Technology and Standard Automated Perimetry Study
title_sort alterations induced by bangerter filters on the visual field a frequency doubling technology and standard automated perimetry study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/909848
work_keys_str_mv AT costantinoschiavi alterationsinducedbybangerterfiltersonthevisualfieldafrequencydoublingtechnologyandstandardautomatedperimetrystudy
AT filippotassi alterationsinducedbybangerterfiltersonthevisualfieldafrequencydoublingtechnologyandstandardautomatedperimetrystudy
AT alessandrofinzi alterationsinducedbybangerterfiltersonthevisualfieldafrequencydoublingtechnologyandstandardautomatedperimetrystudy
AT maurocellini alterationsinducedbybangerterfiltersonthevisualfieldafrequencydoublingtechnologyandstandardautomatedperimetrystudy