Analytical Verification of the Normal Vector Determination Methods for Planar Magnetic Structures

Minimum variance analysis of magnetic fields (MVAB) is conventionally implemented to determine the normal vector of a planar magnetic structure (PMS) for which the average of the normal magnetic field component vanishes (i.e., $\left\langle {B}_{n}\right\rangle $ = 0). A more suitable normal vector...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wai-Leong Teh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ada446
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832582876737044480
author Wai-Leong Teh
author_facet Wai-Leong Teh
author_sort Wai-Leong Teh
collection DOAJ
description Minimum variance analysis of magnetic fields (MVAB) is conventionally implemented to determine the normal vector of a planar magnetic structure (PMS) for which the average of the normal magnetic field component vanishes (i.e., $\left\langle {B}_{n}\right\rangle $ = 0). A more suitable normal vector determination method for single-spacecraft measurements, based on the minimum variance concept, is recommended for PMS studies, namely the MVAB method associated with the constraint $\left\langle {B}_{n}\right\rangle $ = 0 (MVABC). An analytical PMS model is employed to verify the performance of the MVAB and MVABC methods for three different types of PMSs, under the circumstances that the ${B}_{n}$ values are highly fluctuated but the $\left\langle {B}_{n}\right\rangle $ remains zero. The results show that MVABC outperforms MVAB in estimating the PMS normal vector. By analyzing a large number of test data sets randomly selected from the original data set, the conclusion remains unchanged. The normal of a PMS discontinuity, which is associated with significant ${B}_{n}$ fluctuations, is accurately predicted by MVABC and the cross-product method, as compared to MVAB. Moreover, the normal of the discontinuity aligns with the PMS normal, as expected. Two PMS events observed by the Advanced Composition Explorer spacecraft in the sheath of an interplanetary coronal mass ejection are presented. From the MVAB perspective, these two events are not classified as PMSs. The estimated normals of the in situ PMS discontinuities from the cross-product method form angles between 10° and 20° with the predicted PMS normals from MVABC. Discussions are given regarding the failure of the MVAB method in PMS identification.
format Article
id doaj-art-8ffbd1a15eb148c3a4af9acb1ff72934
institution Kabale University
issn 1538-4357
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal
spelling doaj-art-8ffbd1a15eb148c3a4af9acb1ff729342025-01-29T06:47:54ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572025-01-01979222410.3847/1538-4357/ada446Analytical Verification of the Normal Vector Determination Methods for Planar Magnetic StructuresWai-Leong Teh0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-1543Space Science Centre, Institute of Climate Change, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia , 43600 Bangi, Selangor, MalaysiaMinimum variance analysis of magnetic fields (MVAB) is conventionally implemented to determine the normal vector of a planar magnetic structure (PMS) for which the average of the normal magnetic field component vanishes (i.e., $\left\langle {B}_{n}\right\rangle $ = 0). A more suitable normal vector determination method for single-spacecraft measurements, based on the minimum variance concept, is recommended for PMS studies, namely the MVAB method associated with the constraint $\left\langle {B}_{n}\right\rangle $ = 0 (MVABC). An analytical PMS model is employed to verify the performance of the MVAB and MVABC methods for three different types of PMSs, under the circumstances that the ${B}_{n}$ values are highly fluctuated but the $\left\langle {B}_{n}\right\rangle $ remains zero. The results show that MVABC outperforms MVAB in estimating the PMS normal vector. By analyzing a large number of test data sets randomly selected from the original data set, the conclusion remains unchanged. The normal of a PMS discontinuity, which is associated with significant ${B}_{n}$ fluctuations, is accurately predicted by MVABC and the cross-product method, as compared to MVAB. Moreover, the normal of the discontinuity aligns with the PMS normal, as expected. Two PMS events observed by the Advanced Composition Explorer spacecraft in the sheath of an interplanetary coronal mass ejection are presented. From the MVAB perspective, these two events are not classified as PMSs. The estimated normals of the in situ PMS discontinuities from the cross-product method form angles between 10° and 20° with the predicted PMS normals from MVABC. Discussions are given regarding the failure of the MVAB method in PMS identification.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ada446Interplanetary magnetic fieldsSolar wind
spellingShingle Wai-Leong Teh
Analytical Verification of the Normal Vector Determination Methods for Planar Magnetic Structures
The Astrophysical Journal
Interplanetary magnetic fields
Solar wind
title Analytical Verification of the Normal Vector Determination Methods for Planar Magnetic Structures
title_full Analytical Verification of the Normal Vector Determination Methods for Planar Magnetic Structures
title_fullStr Analytical Verification of the Normal Vector Determination Methods for Planar Magnetic Structures
title_full_unstemmed Analytical Verification of the Normal Vector Determination Methods for Planar Magnetic Structures
title_short Analytical Verification of the Normal Vector Determination Methods for Planar Magnetic Structures
title_sort analytical verification of the normal vector determination methods for planar magnetic structures
topic Interplanetary magnetic fields
Solar wind
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ada446
work_keys_str_mv AT waileongteh analyticalverificationofthenormalvectordeterminationmethodsforplanarmagneticstructures