The Complexity and Simulation of Revenue Sharing Negotiation Based on Construction Stakeholders

This paper focuses on the complexity characteristics of a stakeholder’s revenue sharing for time compression in construction projects, such as adopting a life cycle perspective, the preferences of stakeholders, and the adaptability behaviors in the negotiation process. We build an agent-based model...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qingfeng Meng, Jingxian Chen, Kun Qian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:Complexity
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5698170
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832559087291727872
author Qingfeng Meng
Jingxian Chen
Kun Qian
author_facet Qingfeng Meng
Jingxian Chen
Kun Qian
author_sort Qingfeng Meng
collection DOAJ
description This paper focuses on the complexity characteristics of a stakeholder’s revenue sharing for time compression in construction projects, such as adopting a life cycle perspective, the preferences of stakeholders, and the adaptability behaviors in the negotiation process. We build an agent-based model on revenue sharing negotiation. Considering that the agents who are in a weak position not only care about their own benefits but also compare their benefits to others, we design an experimental scenario where a contractor has fairness preference based on China’s reality. According to different sympathy and envy coefficients, we can divide the inequity aversion preference into three typical types, and we research how a contractor’s different types of inequity aversion preferences impact revenue sharing coefficient of agreements, results of successful negotiations, and efficiency in negotiations. Results are as follows: it is advantageous for a contractor to maintain a modest inequity aversion for their own earnings and the degree of sympathy preference in inequity aversion has an important impact on the time to reach consensus while the degree of jealousy preference has no obvious effect. If contractors’ sympathy preference is maintained within a moderate range, it will achieve a higher success rate of negotiations in the negotiation process; the success rate of negotiation is affected largely by the agents’ sympathy preference, though it is also influenced by the jealousy preference, but it is not very sensitive.
format Article
id doaj-art-8fb6954dedfb4254bb1f2deb3cd36016
institution Kabale University
issn 1076-2787
1099-0526
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Complexity
spelling doaj-art-8fb6954dedfb4254bb1f2deb3cd360162025-02-03T01:30:54ZengWileyComplexity1076-27871099-05262018-01-01201810.1155/2018/56981705698170The Complexity and Simulation of Revenue Sharing Negotiation Based on Construction StakeholdersQingfeng Meng0Jingxian Chen1Kun Qian2School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, ChinaSchool of Business, Nantong University, Nantong 226019, ChinaSchool of Accounting, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, ChinaThis paper focuses on the complexity characteristics of a stakeholder’s revenue sharing for time compression in construction projects, such as adopting a life cycle perspective, the preferences of stakeholders, and the adaptability behaviors in the negotiation process. We build an agent-based model on revenue sharing negotiation. Considering that the agents who are in a weak position not only care about their own benefits but also compare their benefits to others, we design an experimental scenario where a contractor has fairness preference based on China’s reality. According to different sympathy and envy coefficients, we can divide the inequity aversion preference into three typical types, and we research how a contractor’s different types of inequity aversion preferences impact revenue sharing coefficient of agreements, results of successful negotiations, and efficiency in negotiations. Results are as follows: it is advantageous for a contractor to maintain a modest inequity aversion for their own earnings and the degree of sympathy preference in inequity aversion has an important impact on the time to reach consensus while the degree of jealousy preference has no obvious effect. If contractors’ sympathy preference is maintained within a moderate range, it will achieve a higher success rate of negotiations in the negotiation process; the success rate of negotiation is affected largely by the agents’ sympathy preference, though it is also influenced by the jealousy preference, but it is not very sensitive.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5698170
spellingShingle Qingfeng Meng
Jingxian Chen
Kun Qian
The Complexity and Simulation of Revenue Sharing Negotiation Based on Construction Stakeholders
Complexity
title The Complexity and Simulation of Revenue Sharing Negotiation Based on Construction Stakeholders
title_full The Complexity and Simulation of Revenue Sharing Negotiation Based on Construction Stakeholders
title_fullStr The Complexity and Simulation of Revenue Sharing Negotiation Based on Construction Stakeholders
title_full_unstemmed The Complexity and Simulation of Revenue Sharing Negotiation Based on Construction Stakeholders
title_short The Complexity and Simulation of Revenue Sharing Negotiation Based on Construction Stakeholders
title_sort complexity and simulation of revenue sharing negotiation based on construction stakeholders
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5698170
work_keys_str_mv AT qingfengmeng thecomplexityandsimulationofrevenuesharingnegotiationbasedonconstructionstakeholders
AT jingxianchen thecomplexityandsimulationofrevenuesharingnegotiationbasedonconstructionstakeholders
AT kunqian thecomplexityandsimulationofrevenuesharingnegotiationbasedonconstructionstakeholders
AT qingfengmeng complexityandsimulationofrevenuesharingnegotiationbasedonconstructionstakeholders
AT jingxianchen complexityandsimulationofrevenuesharingnegotiationbasedonconstructionstakeholders
AT kunqian complexityandsimulationofrevenuesharingnegotiationbasedonconstructionstakeholders