Alterations in gut‐derived uremic toxins before the onset of azotemic chronic kidney disease in cats

Abstract Background Although gut‐derived uremic toxins are increased in azotemic chronic kidney disease (CKD) in cats and implicated in disease progression, it remains unclear if augmented formation or retention of these toxins is associated with the development of renal azotemia. Objectives Assess...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laurens Van Mulders, Ellen Vanden Broecke, Ellen De Paepe, Femke Mortier, Lynn Vanhaecke, Sylvie Daminet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.17289
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Although gut‐derived uremic toxins are increased in azotemic chronic kidney disease (CKD) in cats and implicated in disease progression, it remains unclear if augmented formation or retention of these toxins is associated with the development of renal azotemia. Objectives Assess the association between gut‐derived toxins (ie, indoxyl‐sulfate, p‐cresyl‐sulfate, and trimethylamine‐N‐oxide [TMAO]) and the onset of azotemic CKD in cats. Animals Forty‐eight client‐owned cats. Methods Nested case‐control study, comparing serum and urine gut‐derived uremic toxin abundance at 6‐month intervals between initially healthy cats that developed azotemic CKD (n = 22) and a control group (n = 26) that remained healthy, using a targeted metabolomic approach. Results Cats in the CKD group had significantly higher serum indoxyl‐sulfate (mean [SD], 1.44 [1.06] vs 0.83 [0.46]; P = .02) and TMAO (mean [SD], 1.82 [1.80] vs 1.60 [0.62]; P = .01) abundance 6 months before the detection of azotemic CKD. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis indicated that indoxyl‐sulfate (odds ratio [OR]: 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2‐9.0; P = .04) and TMAO (OR: 3.9; 95% CI: 1.4‐11; P = .03) were predictors for the onset of azotemia 6 months before diagnosis. However, renal function biomarkers creatinine, symmetric dimethylarginine, and urinary specific gravity were significantly correlated with indoxyl‐sulfate and TMAO abundance, causing a loss in predictive significance after correction for these factors. Conclusions Impaired gut‐derived uremic toxin handling is apparent at least 6 months before the diagnosis of azotemia, likely reflecting an already ongoing decrease in GFR, tubular function, or both. A direct causal relationship between gut‐derived uremic toxicity and the initiation of CKD in cats is still lacking.
ISSN:0891-6640
1939-1676