Coping with Knowledge Conditions: A Reply to Reviewers
This reply to the three reviews serves three purposes: it briefly recapitulates the core points of the book, addresses the specific comments raised by the reviewers, and provides general, forward-looking reflections on research in this field. For each comment raised, the responses offer elaborations...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Bologna
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Sociologica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://sociologica.unibo.it/article/view/20882 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832590550187900928 |
|---|---|
| author | Patrik Aspers |
| author_facet | Patrik Aspers |
| author_sort | Patrik Aspers |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This reply to the three reviews serves three purposes: it briefly recapitulates the core points of the book, addresses the specific comments raised by the reviewers, and provides general, forward-looking reflections on research in this field. For each comment raised, the responses offer elaborations and extensions, connecting the discussion to broader questions such as knowledge, truth, and the interplay between subjective and objective uncertainty. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8e3944fc5a6744fdbbc11412e6405170 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1971-8853 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | University of Bologna |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sociologica |
| spelling | doaj-art-8e3944fc5a6744fdbbc11412e64051702025-01-23T13:04:34ZengUniversity of BolognaSociologica1971-88532025-01-0118311111910.6092/issn.1971-8853/2088219254Coping with Knowledge Conditions: A Reply to ReviewersPatrik Aspers0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9840-8669Research Institute of Sociology, University of St. GallenThis reply to the three reviews serves three purposes: it briefly recapitulates the core points of the book, addresses the specific comments raised by the reviewers, and provides general, forward-looking reflections on research in this field. For each comment raised, the responses offer elaborations and extensions, connecting the discussion to broader questions such as knowledge, truth, and the interplay between subjective and objective uncertainty.https://sociologica.unibo.it/article/view/20882ambiguityexistentialtruthsubjectivismratingscience |
| spellingShingle | Patrik Aspers Coping with Knowledge Conditions: A Reply to Reviewers Sociologica ambiguity existential truth subjectivism rating science |
| title | Coping with Knowledge Conditions: A Reply to Reviewers |
| title_full | Coping with Knowledge Conditions: A Reply to Reviewers |
| title_fullStr | Coping with Knowledge Conditions: A Reply to Reviewers |
| title_full_unstemmed | Coping with Knowledge Conditions: A Reply to Reviewers |
| title_short | Coping with Knowledge Conditions: A Reply to Reviewers |
| title_sort | coping with knowledge conditions a reply to reviewers |
| topic | ambiguity existential truth subjectivism rating science |
| url | https://sociologica.unibo.it/article/view/20882 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT patrikaspers copingwithknowledgeconditionsareplytoreviewers |