Ukončení poručenské správy nezletilých osob v raně novověkém městském prostředí

According to municipal law of the Early Modern Period a tutelage of an orphanu- sually ended in two ways: when the orphan reached the full-age or died before. Less fre- quent reason for ending a tutelage was depriving the tutor of his duties because of faults in the administration of orphans...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pavla Slavíčková
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: University of Pardubice 2010-07-01
Series:Theatrum Historiae
Online Access:https://theatrum.upce.cz/index.php/theatrum/article/view/1827
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832586943591874560
author Pavla Slavíčková
author_facet Pavla Slavíčková
author_sort Pavla Slavíčková
collection DOAJ
description According to municipal law of the Early Modern Period a tutelage of an orphanu- sually ended in two ways: when the orphan reached the full-age or died before. Less fre- quent reason for ending a tutelage was depriving the tutor of his duties because of faults in the administration of orphans ́ heritage. In the case that a widow-woman happens to be the tutor of the children, we speak about tutela anomala. This kind of tutelage was usually ended after her new marriage. In that case usually, at least in practice, either an adult son of the family or widow's new husband became the tutor. The duty of every tutor, with the exception of the so called powerful-father tutor, was to render accounts to the orphan at the end of the tutelage and, in the case of his fault, to pay deficiency. After that the orphan becomes a full-fledged owner of the iherited property. In practice, however, the process of getting the money back to the full-aged child, whether it had been placed on deposit at the townhall or at the tutors', usually protracted for many years. Thelaw was also concerned with money lent at interest during the period of tutelage. The full-aged orphan could not take his/her property all at once, but in installments, into which the loan was divided. The tutor did not profit unless the child, or all the children, have died, in that case the tutor was entitled to the third part of the orphan's heritage. According to the law tutor is not entitled to any remuneration, the performance of this duty was therefore probably primarily a matter of personal honor and self-presentation.
format Article
id doaj-art-8d964811e24540f5b77e566528b72e18
institution Kabale University
issn 1802-2502
2571-0621
language ces
publishDate 2010-07-01
publisher University of Pardubice
record_format Article
series Theatrum Historiae
spelling doaj-art-8d964811e24540f5b77e566528b72e182025-01-24T18:29:15ZcesUniversity of PardubiceTheatrum Historiae1802-25022571-06212010-07-016Ukončení poručenské správy nezletilých osob v raně novověkém městském prostředíPavla Slavíčková0Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci According to municipal law of the Early Modern Period a tutelage of an orphanu- sually ended in two ways: when the orphan reached the full-age or died before. Less fre- quent reason for ending a tutelage was depriving the tutor of his duties because of faults in the administration of orphans ́ heritage. In the case that a widow-woman happens to be the tutor of the children, we speak about tutela anomala. This kind of tutelage was usually ended after her new marriage. In that case usually, at least in practice, either an adult son of the family or widow's new husband became the tutor. The duty of every tutor, with the exception of the so called powerful-father tutor, was to render accounts to the orphan at the end of the tutelage and, in the case of his fault, to pay deficiency. After that the orphan becomes a full-fledged owner of the iherited property. In practice, however, the process of getting the money back to the full-aged child, whether it had been placed on deposit at the townhall or at the tutors', usually protracted for many years. Thelaw was also concerned with money lent at interest during the period of tutelage. The full-aged orphan could not take his/her property all at once, but in installments, into which the loan was divided. The tutor did not profit unless the child, or all the children, have died, in that case the tutor was entitled to the third part of the orphan's heritage. According to the law tutor is not entitled to any remuneration, the performance of this duty was therefore probably primarily a matter of personal honor and self-presentation. https://theatrum.upce.cz/index.php/theatrum/article/view/1827
spellingShingle Pavla Slavíčková
Ukončení poručenské správy nezletilých osob v raně novověkém městském prostředí
Theatrum Historiae
title Ukončení poručenské správy nezletilých osob v raně novověkém městském prostředí
title_full Ukončení poručenské správy nezletilých osob v raně novověkém městském prostředí
title_fullStr Ukončení poručenské správy nezletilých osob v raně novověkém městském prostředí
title_full_unstemmed Ukončení poručenské správy nezletilých osob v raně novověkém městském prostředí
title_short Ukončení poručenské správy nezletilých osob v raně novověkém městském prostředí
title_sort ukonceni porucenske spravy nezletilych osob v rane novovekem mestskem prostredi
url https://theatrum.upce.cz/index.php/theatrum/article/view/1827
work_keys_str_mv AT pavlaslavickova ukonceniporucenskespravynezletilychosobvranenovovekemmestskemprostredi