Population exposure to outdoor NO<sub>2</sub>, black carbon, and ultrafine and fine particles over Paris with multi-scale modelling down to the street scale
<p><span id="page3364"/>This study focuses on mapping the concentrations of pollutants of interest to health (<span class="inline-formula">NO<sub>2</sub></span>, black carbon (BC), PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5&l...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
| Online Access: | https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/3363/2025/acp-25-3363-2025.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | <p><span id="page3364"/>This study focuses on mapping the concentrations of pollutants of interest to health (<span class="inline-formula">NO<sub>2</sub></span>, black carbon (BC), PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>, and particle number concentration (PNC)) down to the street scale to represent the population exposure to outdoor concentrations at residences. Simulations are performed over the area of Greater Paris with the WRF-CHIMERE/MUNICH/SSH-aerosol chain, using either the top-down inventory EMEP or the bottom-up inventory Airparif, with correction of the traffic flow. The concentrations of the pollutants are higher in streets than in the regional-scale urban background, due to the strong influence of road traffic emissions locally. Model-to-observation comparisons were performed at urban background and traffic stations and evaluated using two performance criteria from the literature. For BC, harmonized equivalent BC (eBC) concentrations were estimated from concomitant measurements of eBC and elemental carbon. Using the bottom-up inventory with corrected road traffic flow, the strictest criteria are met for <span class="inline-formula">NO<sub>2</sub></span>, eBC, PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>, and PNC. Using the EMEP top-down inventory, the strictest criteria are also met for <span class="inline-formula">NO<sub>2</sub></span>, eBC, and PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>, but errors tend to be larger than with the bottom-up inventory for <span class="inline-formula">NO<sub>2</sub></span>, eBC, and PNC. Using the top-down inventory, the concentrations tend to be lower along the streets than those simulated using the bottom-up inventory, especially for <span class="inline-formula">NO<sub>2</sub></span> concentrations, resulting in fewer urban heterogeneities. The impact of the size distribution of non-exhaust emissions was analysed at both regional and local scales, and it is higher in heavy-traffic streets. To assess exposure, a French database detailing the number of inhabitants in each building was used. The population-weighted concentration (PWC) was calculated by weighting populations by the outdoor concentrations to which they are exposed at the precise location of their home. An exposure scaling factor (ESF) was determined for each pollutant to estimate the ratio needed to correct urban background concentrations in order to assess exposure. The average ESF in Paris and the Paris ring road is higher than 1 for <span class="inline-formula">NO<sub>2</sub></span>, eBC, PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>, and PNC because the concentrations simulated at the local scale in streets are higher than those modelled at the regional scale. It indicates that the Parisian population exposure is underestimated using regional-scale concentrations. Although this underestimation is low for PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>, with an ESF of 1.04, it is very high for <span class="inline-formula">NO<sub>2</sub></span> (1.26), eBC (between 1.22 and 1.24), and PNC (1.12). This shows that urban heterogeneities are important to be considered in order to represent the population exposure to <span class="inline-formula">NO<sub>2</sub></span>, eBC, and PNC but less so for PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span>.</p> |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1680-7316 1680-7324 |