Are Stars Really Ingesting Their Planets? Examining an Alternative Explanation

Numerous stars exhibit surprisingly large variations in their refractory element abundances, often interpreted as signatures of planetary ingestion events. In this study, we propose that differences in the dust-to-gas ratio near stars during their formation can produce similar observational signals....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nadine H. Soliman, Philip F. Hopkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2025-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ada1d5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592364942655488
author Nadine H. Soliman
Philip F. Hopkins
author_facet Nadine H. Soliman
Philip F. Hopkins
author_sort Nadine H. Soliman
collection DOAJ
description Numerous stars exhibit surprisingly large variations in their refractory element abundances, often interpreted as signatures of planetary ingestion events. In this study, we propose that differences in the dust-to-gas ratio near stars during their formation can produce similar observational signals. We investigate this hypothesis using a suite of radiation-dust-magnetohydrodynamic STAR FORmation in Gaseous Environments (or STARFORGE) simulations of star formation. Our results show that the distribution of refractory abundance variations (Δ[X/H]) has extended tails, with about 10%–30% of all stars displaying variations around ∼0.1 dex. These variations are comparable to the accretion of 2–5 M _⊕ of planetary material into the convective zones of Sun-like stars. The width of the distributions increases with the incorporation of more detailed dust physics, such as radiation pressure and back-reaction forces, as well as with larger dust grain sizes and finer resolutions. Furthermore, our simulations reveal no correlation between Δ[X/H] and stellar separations, suggesting that dust-to-gas fluctuations likely occur on scales smaller than those of wide binaries. These findings highlight the importance of considering dust dynamics as a potential source of the observed chemical enrichment in stars.
format Article
id doaj-art-8ccd506b985849a18466f13e092fe2ac
institution Kabale University
issn 1538-4357
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal
spelling doaj-art-8ccd506b985849a18466f13e092fe2ac2025-01-21T09:17:41ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572025-01-0197929810.3847/1538-4357/ada1d5Are Stars Really Ingesting Their Planets? Examining an Alternative ExplanationNadine H. Soliman0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6810-1110Philip F. Hopkins1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3729-1684TAPIR, Mailcode 350-17, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125, USA ; nsoliman@caltech.eduTAPIR, Mailcode 350-17, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91125, USA ; nsoliman@caltech.eduNumerous stars exhibit surprisingly large variations in their refractory element abundances, often interpreted as signatures of planetary ingestion events. In this study, we propose that differences in the dust-to-gas ratio near stars during their formation can produce similar observational signals. We investigate this hypothesis using a suite of radiation-dust-magnetohydrodynamic STAR FORmation in Gaseous Environments (or STARFORGE) simulations of star formation. Our results show that the distribution of refractory abundance variations (Δ[X/H]) has extended tails, with about 10%–30% of all stars displaying variations around ∼0.1 dex. These variations are comparable to the accretion of 2–5 M _⊕ of planetary material into the convective zones of Sun-like stars. The width of the distributions increases with the incorporation of more detailed dust physics, such as radiation pressure and back-reaction forces, as well as with larger dust grain sizes and finer resolutions. Furthermore, our simulations reveal no correlation between Δ[X/H] and stellar separations, suggesting that dust-to-gas fluctuations likely occur on scales smaller than those of wide binaries. These findings highlight the importance of considering dust dynamics as a potential source of the observed chemical enrichment in stars.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ada1d5Chemical abundancesInterstellar dustInterstellar dust processesStellar abundancesChemically peculiar starsStar formation
spellingShingle Nadine H. Soliman
Philip F. Hopkins
Are Stars Really Ingesting Their Planets? Examining an Alternative Explanation
The Astrophysical Journal
Chemical abundances
Interstellar dust
Interstellar dust processes
Stellar abundances
Chemically peculiar stars
Star formation
title Are Stars Really Ingesting Their Planets? Examining an Alternative Explanation
title_full Are Stars Really Ingesting Their Planets? Examining an Alternative Explanation
title_fullStr Are Stars Really Ingesting Their Planets? Examining an Alternative Explanation
title_full_unstemmed Are Stars Really Ingesting Their Planets? Examining an Alternative Explanation
title_short Are Stars Really Ingesting Their Planets? Examining an Alternative Explanation
title_sort are stars really ingesting their planets examining an alternative explanation
topic Chemical abundances
Interstellar dust
Interstellar dust processes
Stellar abundances
Chemically peculiar stars
Star formation
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ada1d5
work_keys_str_mv AT nadinehsoliman arestarsreallyingestingtheirplanetsexamininganalternativeexplanation
AT philipfhopkins arestarsreallyingestingtheirplanetsexamininganalternativeexplanation