Hotărârea Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului în cauza S.C. Zorina Internațional S.R.L împotriva României
The European Court of Justice, in case 15553/15, issued a ruling regarding the administrative sanctioning of a commercial company that violated national legislation regulating the obligation for economic operators to use electronic fiscal devices and the framework for implementing this obligation....
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institutul Român pentru Drepturile Omului
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Drepturile Omului |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revista.irdo.ro/pdf/2024/revista_2_2024/05_Loneta_Gavrea.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832592158487478272 |
|---|---|
| author | Loneta-Honorina Gavrea |
| author_facet | Loneta-Honorina Gavrea |
| author_sort | Loneta-Honorina Gavrea |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The European Court of Justice, in case 15553/15, issued a ruling regarding the
administrative sanctioning of a commercial company that violated national legislation regulating the obligation for economic operators to use electronic fiscal devices and the framework for implementing this obligation. The company failed to issue fiscal receipts for a small amount, for which the national legislation in force at that time prescribed cumulative and strict sanctions: a substantial fine and the suspension of the company’s activity for a period of three months. The referral to the Court regarding the contested interference fell within the scope of analysis of the second paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol 1 concerning measures
“to regulate the use of property” and with regard to the fine “to ensure the payment of taxes or other contributions or fines”. The Court’s assessment of whether the national authorities ensured a fair balance between the general interest, on the one hand, and the respect for property rights, on the other hand, was made by a majority vote, six to one. It was concluded that there was no violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. However, the minority opinion opened a new perspective in the judicial
approach to such cases, namely whether it is reasonable for the national legislation of the
Convention’s signatory member states to impose excessive sanctions for the commission of a minor administrative offense, and what the limits of such an approach should be. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8bfc869d5dab423b8ee6d7a710066ee5 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1220-613X 2668-9499 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Institutul Român pentru Drepturile Omului |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Drepturile Omului |
| spelling | doaj-art-8bfc869d5dab423b8ee6d7a710066ee52025-01-21T13:03:12ZengInstitutul Român pentru Drepturile OmuluiDrepturile Omului1220-613X2668-94992024-12-01XXXIV2109120Hotărârea Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului în cauza S.C. Zorina Internațional S.R.L împotriva RomânieiLoneta-Honorina Gavrea0Romanian Institute for Human RightsThe European Court of Justice, in case 15553/15, issued a ruling regarding the administrative sanctioning of a commercial company that violated national legislation regulating the obligation for economic operators to use electronic fiscal devices and the framework for implementing this obligation. The company failed to issue fiscal receipts for a small amount, for which the national legislation in force at that time prescribed cumulative and strict sanctions: a substantial fine and the suspension of the company’s activity for a period of three months. The referral to the Court regarding the contested interference fell within the scope of analysis of the second paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol 1 concerning measures “to regulate the use of property” and with regard to the fine “to ensure the payment of taxes or other contributions or fines”. The Court’s assessment of whether the national authorities ensured a fair balance between the general interest, on the one hand, and the respect for property rights, on the other hand, was made by a majority vote, six to one. It was concluded that there was no violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. However, the minority opinion opened a new perspective in the judicial approach to such cases, namely whether it is reasonable for the national legislation of the Convention’s signatory member states to impose excessive sanctions for the commission of a minor administrative offense, and what the limits of such an approach should be.https://revista.irdo.ro/pdf/2024/revista_2_2024/05_Loneta_Gavrea.pdfpropertycompanycommercial activitiessanctionsfiscal receiptstax inspectionspecial lawgeneral law |
| spellingShingle | Loneta-Honorina Gavrea Hotărârea Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului în cauza S.C. Zorina Internațional S.R.L împotriva României Drepturile Omului property company commercial activities sanctions fiscal receipts tax inspection special law general law |
| title | Hotărârea Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului în cauza S.C. Zorina Internațional S.R.L împotriva României |
| title_full | Hotărârea Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului în cauza S.C. Zorina Internațional S.R.L împotriva României |
| title_fullStr | Hotărârea Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului în cauza S.C. Zorina Internațional S.R.L împotriva României |
| title_full_unstemmed | Hotărârea Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului în cauza S.C. Zorina Internațional S.R.L împotriva României |
| title_short | Hotărârea Curții Europene a Drepturilor Omului în cauza S.C. Zorina Internațional S.R.L împotriva României |
| title_sort | hotararea curtii europene a drepturilor omului in cauza s c zorina international s r l impotriva romaniei |
| topic | property company commercial activities sanctions fiscal receipts tax inspection special law general law |
| url | https://revista.irdo.ro/pdf/2024/revista_2_2024/05_Loneta_Gavrea.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lonetahonorinagavrea hotarareacurtiieuropeneadrepturiloromuluiincauzasczorinainternationalsrlimpotrivaromaniei |