Comparison of Tracheal Diameter Measured by Chest X-Ray and by Computed Tomography

Assessments of tracheal diameter (TD) are important to select proper endotracheal tubes. Previous studies have used X-ray and physical indices to estimate tracheal diameter but these may not reflect the actual TD. We compared TD measured by X-ray (TD-XP) and by computer tomography (TD-CT) in 200 pat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shigeki Sakuraba, Ryohei Serita, Junya Kuribayashi, Shizuko Kosugi, Hirofumi Arisaka, Kazuichi Yoshida, Junzo Takeda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2010-01-01
Series:Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/269171
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832553342116560896
author Shigeki Sakuraba
Ryohei Serita
Junya Kuribayashi
Shizuko Kosugi
Hirofumi Arisaka
Kazuichi Yoshida
Junzo Takeda
author_facet Shigeki Sakuraba
Ryohei Serita
Junya Kuribayashi
Shizuko Kosugi
Hirofumi Arisaka
Kazuichi Yoshida
Junzo Takeda
author_sort Shigeki Sakuraba
collection DOAJ
description Assessments of tracheal diameter (TD) are important to select proper endotracheal tubes. Previous studies have used X-ray and physical indices to estimate tracheal diameter but these may not reflect the actual TD. We compared TD measured by X-ray (TD-XP) and by computer tomography (TD-CT) in 200 patients. Also, we analyzed correlation of TD-CT with physical indices such as age, height, weight, and BMI. TD-XP and TD-CT were significantly correlated (male: n=55, P=.0146; female: n=91, P=.001). TD-XP was 0.4 mm wider in male and 1.0 mm wider in female than TD-CT. However, correlation coefficients of TD-XP and TD-CT are very weak (male: r=0.36; female: r=0.653). TD-CT did not correlate with age, height, weight, or BMI. Our findings suggest that correlations of TD-XP and TD are statistically significant but not clinically significant. Physical indices are not useful to estimate TD.
format Article
id doaj-art-8baab5b326394255bcde4b8d6fc4af50
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6962
1687-6970
language English
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Anesthesiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-8baab5b326394255bcde4b8d6fc4af502025-02-03T05:54:21ZengWileyAnesthesiology Research and Practice1687-69621687-69702010-01-01201010.1155/2010/269171269171Comparison of Tracheal Diameter Measured by Chest X-Ray and by Computed TomographyShigeki Sakuraba0Ryohei Serita1Junya Kuribayashi2Shizuko Kosugi3Hirofumi Arisaka4Kazuichi Yoshida5Junzo Takeda6Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Care Medicine, Kanagawa Dental College, Kanagawa 238-8580, JapanDepartment of Anesthesia, Kasumigaura National Hospital, Ibaraki 300-8585, JapanDepartment of Anesthesia, Kasumigaura National Hospital, Ibaraki 300-8585, JapanDepartment of Anesthesia, Kasumigaura National Hospital, Ibaraki 300-8585, JapanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Clinical Care Medicine, Kanagawa Dental College, Kanagawa 238-8580, JapanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Clinical Care Medicine, Kanagawa Dental College, Kanagawa 238-8580, JapanDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo 160-8582, JapanAssessments of tracheal diameter (TD) are important to select proper endotracheal tubes. Previous studies have used X-ray and physical indices to estimate tracheal diameter but these may not reflect the actual TD. We compared TD measured by X-ray (TD-XP) and by computer tomography (TD-CT) in 200 patients. Also, we analyzed correlation of TD-CT with physical indices such as age, height, weight, and BMI. TD-XP and TD-CT were significantly correlated (male: n=55, P=.0146; female: n=91, P=.001). TD-XP was 0.4 mm wider in male and 1.0 mm wider in female than TD-CT. However, correlation coefficients of TD-XP and TD-CT are very weak (male: r=0.36; female: r=0.653). TD-CT did not correlate with age, height, weight, or BMI. Our findings suggest that correlations of TD-XP and TD are statistically significant but not clinically significant. Physical indices are not useful to estimate TD.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/269171
spellingShingle Shigeki Sakuraba
Ryohei Serita
Junya Kuribayashi
Shizuko Kosugi
Hirofumi Arisaka
Kazuichi Yoshida
Junzo Takeda
Comparison of Tracheal Diameter Measured by Chest X-Ray and by Computed Tomography
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
title Comparison of Tracheal Diameter Measured by Chest X-Ray and by Computed Tomography
title_full Comparison of Tracheal Diameter Measured by Chest X-Ray and by Computed Tomography
title_fullStr Comparison of Tracheal Diameter Measured by Chest X-Ray and by Computed Tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Tracheal Diameter Measured by Chest X-Ray and by Computed Tomography
title_short Comparison of Tracheal Diameter Measured by Chest X-Ray and by Computed Tomography
title_sort comparison of tracheal diameter measured by chest x ray and by computed tomography
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/269171
work_keys_str_mv AT shigekisakuraba comparisonoftrachealdiametermeasuredbychestxrayandbycomputedtomography
AT ryoheiserita comparisonoftrachealdiametermeasuredbychestxrayandbycomputedtomography
AT junyakuribayashi comparisonoftrachealdiametermeasuredbychestxrayandbycomputedtomography
AT shizukokosugi comparisonoftrachealdiametermeasuredbychestxrayandbycomputedtomography
AT hirofumiarisaka comparisonoftrachealdiametermeasuredbychestxrayandbycomputedtomography
AT kazuichiyoshida comparisonoftrachealdiametermeasuredbychestxrayandbycomputedtomography
AT junzotakeda comparisonoftrachealdiametermeasuredbychestxrayandbycomputedtomography