Gümrük Birliği “Anlaşması”nın 1/95 Sayılı Ortaklık Konseyi Kararı’nın Hukuksal Niteliği
In the (former) candidate countries, the decisions of Association Councils havebeen construed as a kind of treaty. In most cases, they have been either promulgated bya governmental decree or published in official gazettes. All the same, the decisions ofthe EC-Turkey Association Council, established...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Ankara University
2004-05-01
|
| Series: | Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/847858 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832546410102259712 |
|---|---|
| author | Kemal Başlar |
| author_facet | Kemal Başlar |
| author_sort | Kemal Başlar |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In the (former) candidate countries, the decisions of Association Councils havebeen construed as a kind of treaty. In most cases, they have been either promulgated bya governmental decree or published in official gazettes. All the same, the decisions ofthe EC-Turkey Association Council, established by the Ankara Agreement of 1963, arenot generally viewed as a treaty (i.e. agreement or memorandunı of understanding).Neither is it counted on as an act of government so as to subject to judicial review. Noconcrete answer has been giyen hitherto to the question as to the legal status of theAssociation Council decisions in Turkey. In the midst of uncertainties, this articleendeavours to look at the legal nature of Association Council decisions per se and the1195 Association Council Decision in particular.The 1195 Decision establishing a customs union between EC and Turkey wasneither approved of by Parliament nor ratified by President. Corollary, it was notpublished in the Official Gazette. This article argues that the 1/95 Customs UnionDecision should have been put into force by way of the procedure laid down in Article90 of the Turkish Constitution. As having not been done as such, - the author opinesthat - it is an unconstitutional document which must be declared as null and void.This article casts light on the case law of the Council of State and theConstitutional Court to see if there is any likelihood that the 1/95 Decision be declaredby the said Courts as having no legal validity in domestic law. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8b9ab403a1c74403a1f592e65dfa32e0 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1303-2518 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2004-05-01 |
| publisher | Ankara University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi |
| spelling | doaj-art-8b9ab403a1c74403a1f592e65dfa32e02025-02-03T06:54:46ZengAnkara UniversityAnkara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi1303-25182004-05-014115119810.1501/Avraras_000000008645Gümrük Birliği “Anlaşması”nın 1/95 Sayılı Ortaklık Konseyi Kararı’nın Hukuksal NiteliğiKemal Başlar0* Dr., Anayasa Mahkemesi Raportör hakim.In the (former) candidate countries, the decisions of Association Councils havebeen construed as a kind of treaty. In most cases, they have been either promulgated bya governmental decree or published in official gazettes. All the same, the decisions ofthe EC-Turkey Association Council, established by the Ankara Agreement of 1963, arenot generally viewed as a treaty (i.e. agreement or memorandunı of understanding).Neither is it counted on as an act of government so as to subject to judicial review. Noconcrete answer has been giyen hitherto to the question as to the legal status of theAssociation Council decisions in Turkey. In the midst of uncertainties, this articleendeavours to look at the legal nature of Association Council decisions per se and the1195 Association Council Decision in particular.The 1195 Decision establishing a customs union between EC and Turkey wasneither approved of by Parliament nor ratified by President. Corollary, it was notpublished in the Official Gazette. This article argues that the 1/95 Customs UnionDecision should have been put into force by way of the procedure laid down in Article90 of the Turkish Constitution. As having not been done as such, - the author opinesthat - it is an unconstitutional document which must be declared as null and void.This article casts light on the case law of the Council of State and theConstitutional Court to see if there is any likelihood that the 1/95 Decision be declaredby the said Courts as having no legal validity in domestic law.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/847858customs uniondecisions of association councilentry into force of treatiesdecisions on nullityjudicial review of treaties.gümrük birliğiortaklık konseyihukuk |
| spellingShingle | Kemal Başlar Gümrük Birliği “Anlaşması”nın 1/95 Sayılı Ortaklık Konseyi Kararı’nın Hukuksal Niteliği Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi customs union decisions of association council entry into force of treaties decisions on nullity judicial review of treaties. gümrük birliği ortaklık konseyi hukuk |
| title | Gümrük Birliği “Anlaşması”nın 1/95 Sayılı Ortaklık Konseyi Kararı’nın Hukuksal Niteliği |
| title_full | Gümrük Birliği “Anlaşması”nın 1/95 Sayılı Ortaklık Konseyi Kararı’nın Hukuksal Niteliği |
| title_fullStr | Gümrük Birliği “Anlaşması”nın 1/95 Sayılı Ortaklık Konseyi Kararı’nın Hukuksal Niteliği |
| title_full_unstemmed | Gümrük Birliği “Anlaşması”nın 1/95 Sayılı Ortaklık Konseyi Kararı’nın Hukuksal Niteliği |
| title_short | Gümrük Birliği “Anlaşması”nın 1/95 Sayılı Ortaklık Konseyi Kararı’nın Hukuksal Niteliği |
| title_sort | gumruk birligi anlasmasi nin 1 95 sayili ortaklik konseyi karari nin hukuksal niteligi |
| topic | customs union decisions of association council entry into force of treaties decisions on nullity judicial review of treaties. gümrük birliği ortaklık konseyi hukuk |
| url | https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/847858 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kemalbaslar gumrukbirligianlasmasının195sayılıortaklıkkonseyikararınınhukuksalniteligi |