Comparison of Psychotherapeutic Supervision Paradigms: A Literature Review
While there is a considerable body of literature on various psychotherapeutic paradigms and their respective models of supervision, there are not many articles reviewing and comparing different supervisory traditions and supervisor–supervisee relationships. However, this comparison is important on...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Vilnius University Press
2023-10-01
|
Series: | Psichologija |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.journals.vu.lt/psichologija/article/view/33060 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832593013582331904 |
---|---|
author | Greta Kaluževičiūtė-Moreton Paulius Skruibis Marija Vaštakė Neringa Grigutytė |
author_facet | Greta Kaluževičiūtė-Moreton Paulius Skruibis Marija Vaštakė Neringa Grigutytė |
author_sort | Greta Kaluževičiūtė-Moreton |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
While there is a considerable body of literature on various psychotherapeutic paradigms and their respective models of supervision, there are not many articles reviewing and comparing different supervisory traditions and supervisor–supervisee relationships. However, this comparison is important on both theoretical and practical levels: it is essential to identify features of supervision that are unique to each paradigm and to determine whether there are any universal or common supervision processes prevalent across a variety of paradigms. This literature review aims to provide a clearer understanding of both commonalities and distinctions among various theoretical paradigms (such as psychoanalytic/psychodynamic, cognitive, and existential/humanistic therapies) and their corresponding models of supervision. To accomplish this goal, the paper examines essential aspects of supervisory relationships within each paradigm, focusing on: a) the key features of the supervision process, b) the supervisor’s role and engagement in the supervision, and c) the primary interventions and factors contributing to the effectiveness of supervision. We identify features that are unique and specific to supervisory relationships in each of the paradigms, as well as features that are common to all three traditions. Considering the theoretical underpinnings of each tradition, the paper discusses epistemological assumptions that could determine the effectiveness of supervision in the context of each therapeutic paradigm.
|
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-8b9a2cc3413d48caaa9c09d097161026 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1392-0359 2345-0061 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
publisher | Vilnius University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Psichologija |
spelling | doaj-art-8b9a2cc3413d48caaa9c09d0971610262025-01-20T18:25:50ZengVilnius University PressPsichologija1392-03592345-00612023-10-016810.15388/Psichol.2023.62Comparison of Psychotherapeutic Supervision Paradigms: A Literature ReviewGreta Kaluževičiūtė-Moreton0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1197-177XPaulius Skruibis1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9960-0193Marija Vaštakė2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8975-7832Neringa Grigutytė3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4750-0363Vilnius University, Institute of Psychology, Department of Clinical PsychologyVilnius University, Institute of Psychology, Department of Clinical PsychologyVilnius University, Institute of Psychology, Department of Clinical PsychologyVilnius University, Institute of Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychology While there is a considerable body of literature on various psychotherapeutic paradigms and their respective models of supervision, there are not many articles reviewing and comparing different supervisory traditions and supervisor–supervisee relationships. However, this comparison is important on both theoretical and practical levels: it is essential to identify features of supervision that are unique to each paradigm and to determine whether there are any universal or common supervision processes prevalent across a variety of paradigms. This literature review aims to provide a clearer understanding of both commonalities and distinctions among various theoretical paradigms (such as psychoanalytic/psychodynamic, cognitive, and existential/humanistic therapies) and their corresponding models of supervision. To accomplish this goal, the paper examines essential aspects of supervisory relationships within each paradigm, focusing on: a) the key features of the supervision process, b) the supervisor’s role and engagement in the supervision, and c) the primary interventions and factors contributing to the effectiveness of supervision. We identify features that are unique and specific to supervisory relationships in each of the paradigms, as well as features that are common to all three traditions. Considering the theoretical underpinnings of each tradition, the paper discusses epistemological assumptions that could determine the effectiveness of supervision in the context of each therapeutic paradigm. https://www.journals.vu.lt/psichologija/article/view/33060SupervisionPsychoanalysisCognitive behavioural therapyExistential-humanistic therapyEffectiveness of supervision |
spellingShingle | Greta Kaluževičiūtė-Moreton Paulius Skruibis Marija Vaštakė Neringa Grigutytė Comparison of Psychotherapeutic Supervision Paradigms: A Literature Review Psichologija Supervision Psychoanalysis Cognitive behavioural therapy Existential-humanistic therapy Effectiveness of supervision |
title | Comparison of Psychotherapeutic Supervision Paradigms: A Literature Review |
title_full | Comparison of Psychotherapeutic Supervision Paradigms: A Literature Review |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Psychotherapeutic Supervision Paradigms: A Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Psychotherapeutic Supervision Paradigms: A Literature Review |
title_short | Comparison of Psychotherapeutic Supervision Paradigms: A Literature Review |
title_sort | comparison of psychotherapeutic supervision paradigms a literature review |
topic | Supervision Psychoanalysis Cognitive behavioural therapy Existential-humanistic therapy Effectiveness of supervision |
url | https://www.journals.vu.lt/psichologija/article/view/33060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gretakaluzeviciutemoreton comparisonofpsychotherapeuticsupervisionparadigmsaliteraturereview AT pauliusskruibis comparisonofpsychotherapeuticsupervisionparadigmsaliteraturereview AT marijavastake comparisonofpsychotherapeuticsupervisionparadigmsaliteraturereview AT neringagrigutyte comparisonofpsychotherapeuticsupervisionparadigmsaliteraturereview |