The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering
Background. Systematic studies on factitious disorders and malingering in large populations are rare. To address this issue, we performed a nationwide epidemiological study in Norway on the incidence of these diagnoses in an unselected patient population. In particular, we tried to confirm the diagn...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2019-01-01
|
| Series: | Behavioural Neurology |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3891809 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832554024807694336 |
|---|---|
| author | Harald Schrader Thomas Bøhmer Jan Aasly |
| author_facet | Harald Schrader Thomas Bøhmer Jan Aasly |
| author_sort | Harald Schrader |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background. Systematic studies on factitious disorders and malingering in large populations are rare. To address this issue, we performed a nationwide epidemiological study in Norway on the incidence of these diagnoses in an unselected patient population. In particular, we tried to confirm the diagnoses and to estimate the contribution of Munchausen syndrome to the spectrum of factitious disorders. Methods. We analyzed data obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR), which provided a deidentified list of all patients from 2008 to 2016 who had received the ICD-10 diagnosis of F68.1 or the diagnosis code Z76.5. Results. Altogether, 237 patients (99 females; 138 males) received a diagnosis of F68.1. Code Z76.5 was applied to 52 patients (12 females; 40 males), all diagnosed within health institutions. Three of 1700 specialists (somatic specialist, psychologist, or psychiatrist) in private practice had diagnosed a factitious disorder in altogether 87 patients. After contacting these specialists, we could identify no true case of F68.1. For 24 of 146 patients who were equally distributed by gender within health institutions, we managed to identify the diagnosing healthcare providers. Of these 24 patients, only 11 correctly qualified for code F68.1. Only two female patients qualified for a Munchausen syndrome diagnosis. Conclusions. There is a male predominance for the diagnosis of malingering. An earlier suspicion of a female predominance for Munchausen syndrome is upheld. There is significant underdiagnosing and misdiagnosing for both conditions and for factitious disorders in general. To separate the most serious form of factitious disorders from milder forms and to facilitate more systematic research, we recommend a specific ICD diagnosis for Munchausen syndrome. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8b41e8d9ab7d46d9b4ba4455a1083c37 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0953-4180 1875-8584 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Behavioural Neurology |
| spelling | doaj-art-8b41e8d9ab7d46d9b4ba4455a1083c372025-02-03T05:52:36ZengWileyBehavioural Neurology0953-41801875-85842019-01-01201910.1155/2019/38918093891809The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and MalingeringHarald Schrader0Thomas Bøhmer1Jan Aasly2Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, NorwayOslo University Hospital, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Aker, Oslo, NorwayDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, NorwayBackground. Systematic studies on factitious disorders and malingering in large populations are rare. To address this issue, we performed a nationwide epidemiological study in Norway on the incidence of these diagnoses in an unselected patient population. In particular, we tried to confirm the diagnoses and to estimate the contribution of Munchausen syndrome to the spectrum of factitious disorders. Methods. We analyzed data obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR), which provided a deidentified list of all patients from 2008 to 2016 who had received the ICD-10 diagnosis of F68.1 or the diagnosis code Z76.5. Results. Altogether, 237 patients (99 females; 138 males) received a diagnosis of F68.1. Code Z76.5 was applied to 52 patients (12 females; 40 males), all diagnosed within health institutions. Three of 1700 specialists (somatic specialist, psychologist, or psychiatrist) in private practice had diagnosed a factitious disorder in altogether 87 patients. After contacting these specialists, we could identify no true case of F68.1. For 24 of 146 patients who were equally distributed by gender within health institutions, we managed to identify the diagnosing healthcare providers. Of these 24 patients, only 11 correctly qualified for code F68.1. Only two female patients qualified for a Munchausen syndrome diagnosis. Conclusions. There is a male predominance for the diagnosis of malingering. An earlier suspicion of a female predominance for Munchausen syndrome is upheld. There is significant underdiagnosing and misdiagnosing for both conditions and for factitious disorders in general. To separate the most serious form of factitious disorders from milder forms and to facilitate more systematic research, we recommend a specific ICD diagnosis for Munchausen syndrome.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3891809 |
| spellingShingle | Harald Schrader Thomas Bøhmer Jan Aasly The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering Behavioural Neurology |
| title | The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering |
| title_full | The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering |
| title_fullStr | The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering |
| title_short | The Incidence of Diagnosis of Munchausen Syndrome, Other Factitious Disorders, and Malingering |
| title_sort | incidence of diagnosis of munchausen syndrome other factitious disorders and malingering |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3891809 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT haraldschrader theincidenceofdiagnosisofmunchausensyndromeotherfactitiousdisordersandmalingering AT thomasbøhmer theincidenceofdiagnosisofmunchausensyndromeotherfactitiousdisordersandmalingering AT janaasly theincidenceofdiagnosisofmunchausensyndromeotherfactitiousdisordersandmalingering AT haraldschrader incidenceofdiagnosisofmunchausensyndromeotherfactitiousdisordersandmalingering AT thomasbøhmer incidenceofdiagnosisofmunchausensyndromeotherfactitiousdisordersandmalingering AT janaasly incidenceofdiagnosisofmunchausensyndromeotherfactitiousdisordersandmalingering |