Effect of Glass Fiber Post Surface Treatment on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement: An “In Vitro” Study
Objective. This study evaluated the influence of different mechanical and chemical surface treatments alone and combined with silane on the bond strength (BS) of glass fiber posts (GFPs) using self-adhesive resin cement. Methods. Eighty-four single-rooted bovine teeth (six groups, n = 14) were submi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Dentistry |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8856657 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832545934241693696 |
---|---|
author | Lairds Rodrigues dos Santos Darlon Martins Lima Edilausson Moreno Carvalho Vandilson Pinheiro Rodrigues Claudia Maria Coelho Alves |
author_facet | Lairds Rodrigues dos Santos Darlon Martins Lima Edilausson Moreno Carvalho Vandilson Pinheiro Rodrigues Claudia Maria Coelho Alves |
author_sort | Lairds Rodrigues dos Santos |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective. This study evaluated the influence of different mechanical and chemical surface treatments alone and combined with silane on the bond strength (BS) of glass fiber posts (GFPs) using self-adhesive resin cement. Methods. Eighty-four single-rooted bovine teeth (six groups, n = 14) were submitted to BS analysis after GFP cementation. The treatments applied in the studied groups were no surface treatment (control), silane (S), 24% hydrogen peroxide (PER), 24% hydrogen peroxide and silane (PER + SIL), blasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles (BLAST), and blasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles and silane (BLAST + SIL). Results. BS differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001). It was higher in the SIL (10.5 ± 3.5 MPa), BLAST + SIL (11.5 ± 3.2 MPa), and PER + SIL (11.6 ± 4.6 MPa) groups than in the control (6.5 ± 2.9 MPa), BLAST (8.6 ± 4.0 MPa), and PER (7.1 ± 2.8 MPa) groups, with no significant difference among groups receiving silanization. Cement post adhesive failure was more common in the SIL, BLAST, and PER + SIL groups, and cement-dentin adhesive failure was more common in the control, BLAST + SIL, and PER groups. Conclusion. These results show that silane application alone increases BS. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-8add6edda2b345ea855f32782fc3c448 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-8728 1687-8736 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Dentistry |
spelling | doaj-art-8add6edda2b345ea855f32782fc3c4482025-02-03T07:24:23ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362021-01-01202110.1155/2021/88566578856657Effect of Glass Fiber Post Surface Treatment on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement: An “In Vitro” StudyLairds Rodrigues dos Santos0Darlon Martins Lima1Edilausson Moreno Carvalho2Vandilson Pinheiro Rodrigues3Claudia Maria Coelho Alves4Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luis, Maranhão, BrazilGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luis, Maranhão, BrazilGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luis, Maranhão, BrazilGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luis, Maranhão, BrazilGraduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luis, Maranhão, BrazilObjective. This study evaluated the influence of different mechanical and chemical surface treatments alone and combined with silane on the bond strength (BS) of glass fiber posts (GFPs) using self-adhesive resin cement. Methods. Eighty-four single-rooted bovine teeth (six groups, n = 14) were submitted to BS analysis after GFP cementation. The treatments applied in the studied groups were no surface treatment (control), silane (S), 24% hydrogen peroxide (PER), 24% hydrogen peroxide and silane (PER + SIL), blasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles (BLAST), and blasting with 50 μm aluminum oxide particles and silane (BLAST + SIL). Results. BS differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001). It was higher in the SIL (10.5 ± 3.5 MPa), BLAST + SIL (11.5 ± 3.2 MPa), and PER + SIL (11.6 ± 4.6 MPa) groups than in the control (6.5 ± 2.9 MPa), BLAST (8.6 ± 4.0 MPa), and PER (7.1 ± 2.8 MPa) groups, with no significant difference among groups receiving silanization. Cement post adhesive failure was more common in the SIL, BLAST, and PER + SIL groups, and cement-dentin adhesive failure was more common in the control, BLAST + SIL, and PER groups. Conclusion. These results show that silane application alone increases BS.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8856657 |
spellingShingle | Lairds Rodrigues dos Santos Darlon Martins Lima Edilausson Moreno Carvalho Vandilson Pinheiro Rodrigues Claudia Maria Coelho Alves Effect of Glass Fiber Post Surface Treatment on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement: An “In Vitro” Study International Journal of Dentistry |
title | Effect of Glass Fiber Post Surface Treatment on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement: An “In Vitro” Study |
title_full | Effect of Glass Fiber Post Surface Treatment on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement: An “In Vitro” Study |
title_fullStr | Effect of Glass Fiber Post Surface Treatment on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement: An “In Vitro” Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Glass Fiber Post Surface Treatment on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement: An “In Vitro” Study |
title_short | Effect of Glass Fiber Post Surface Treatment on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement: An “In Vitro” Study |
title_sort | effect of glass fiber post surface treatment on bond strength of a self adhesive resin cement an in vitro study |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/8856657 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lairdsrodriguesdossantos effectofglassfiberpostsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofaselfadhesiveresincementaninvitrostudy AT darlonmartinslima effectofglassfiberpostsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofaselfadhesiveresincementaninvitrostudy AT edilaussonmorenocarvalho effectofglassfiberpostsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofaselfadhesiveresincementaninvitrostudy AT vandilsonpinheirorodrigues effectofglassfiberpostsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofaselfadhesiveresincementaninvitrostudy AT claudiamariacoelhoalves effectofglassfiberpostsurfacetreatmentonbondstrengthofaselfadhesiveresincementaninvitrostudy |