Compatible bedfellows: Enriching grammar pedagogical tasks with cognitive linguistics to teach present simple vs. progressive

While many English language learning textbooks provide exercises on the difference between present simple and present progressive tenses, they often lack meticulous explanations regarding their meaning and contextual usage. Having been inspired by cognitive linguistic studies on English present tens...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mojtaba Maghsoudi, Abolfazl Khodamoradi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: University of Isfahan 2024-09-01
Series:نشریه پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناسی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jrl.ui.ac.ir/article_28540_904fbf32290c57f104137e04419c0f6a.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832595694205009920
author Mojtaba Maghsoudi
Abolfazl Khodamoradi
author_facet Mojtaba Maghsoudi
Abolfazl Khodamoradi
author_sort Mojtaba Maghsoudi
collection DOAJ
description While many English language learning textbooks provide exercises on the difference between present simple and present progressive tenses, they often lack meticulous explanations regarding their meaning and contextual usage. Having been inspired by cognitive linguistic studies on English present tense and the theory of Cognitive Grammar, an empirical study was devised to incorporate the elements of cognitive linguistics analysis of English present progressive tense into EFL grammar teaching material. This quasi-experimental study included 53 adult EFL learners being homogenized in terms of their English proficiency based on their scores on Quick Oxford Placement Test, and randomly assigned to three groups. The course of instruction lasted for three weeks during which the groups met 6 times. The cognitive group (N = 18) received cognitive linguistic explanations followed by examples indicating inherited epistemic contingency in English present progressive tense (including, current ongoingness, historical present progressive, future present progressive, temporary validity, duration, iteration, repetition, and modality) and structural construal indicated by present simple. The task-based group (N = 16) received conscious-raising tasks lacking cognitive linguistic explanations. The control group (N = 19) did not receive any explicit instruction. Pretest and posttest scores were used to measure the effectiveness of the types of instruction. The results of paired samples t-test and one-way ANOVA revealed that the cognitive group outperformed the task-based group and the control group showing a higher level of construing usage context of present simple and present progressive tense.
format Article
id doaj-art-8ad1647b0685431b80509a314868a9eb
institution Kabale University
issn 2322-3413
language fas
publishDate 2024-09-01
publisher University of Isfahan
record_format Article
series نشریه پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناسی
spelling doaj-art-8ad1647b0685431b80509a314868a9eb2025-01-18T06:51:27ZfasUniversity of Isfahanنشریه پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناسی2322-34132024-09-01162294010.22108/jrl.2024.141342.184528540Compatible bedfellows: Enriching grammar pedagogical tasks with cognitive linguistics to teach present simple vs. progressiveMojtaba Maghsoudi0Abolfazl Khodamoradi1Department of English Language Teaching, Farhangian University, Tehran, IranDepartment of English Language Teaching, Farhangian University, Tehran, IranWhile many English language learning textbooks provide exercises on the difference between present simple and present progressive tenses, they often lack meticulous explanations regarding their meaning and contextual usage. Having been inspired by cognitive linguistic studies on English present tense and the theory of Cognitive Grammar, an empirical study was devised to incorporate the elements of cognitive linguistics analysis of English present progressive tense into EFL grammar teaching material. This quasi-experimental study included 53 adult EFL learners being homogenized in terms of their English proficiency based on their scores on Quick Oxford Placement Test, and randomly assigned to three groups. The course of instruction lasted for three weeks during which the groups met 6 times. The cognitive group (N = 18) received cognitive linguistic explanations followed by examples indicating inherited epistemic contingency in English present progressive tense (including, current ongoingness, historical present progressive, future present progressive, temporary validity, duration, iteration, repetition, and modality) and structural construal indicated by present simple. The task-based group (N = 16) received conscious-raising tasks lacking cognitive linguistic explanations. The control group (N = 19) did not receive any explicit instruction. Pretest and posttest scores were used to measure the effectiveness of the types of instruction. The results of paired samples t-test and one-way ANOVA revealed that the cognitive group outperformed the task-based group and the control group showing a higher level of construing usage context of present simple and present progressive tense.https://jrl.ui.ac.ir/article_28540_904fbf32290c57f104137e04419c0f6a.pdfcognitive linguisticsgrammar teachingpresent progressivepresent simpletask-based instruction
spellingShingle Mojtaba Maghsoudi
Abolfazl Khodamoradi
Compatible bedfellows: Enriching grammar pedagogical tasks with cognitive linguistics to teach present simple vs. progressive
نشریه پژوهش‌های زبان‌شناسی
cognitive linguistics
grammar teaching
present progressive
present simple
task-based instruction
title Compatible bedfellows: Enriching grammar pedagogical tasks with cognitive linguistics to teach present simple vs. progressive
title_full Compatible bedfellows: Enriching grammar pedagogical tasks with cognitive linguistics to teach present simple vs. progressive
title_fullStr Compatible bedfellows: Enriching grammar pedagogical tasks with cognitive linguistics to teach present simple vs. progressive
title_full_unstemmed Compatible bedfellows: Enriching grammar pedagogical tasks with cognitive linguistics to teach present simple vs. progressive
title_short Compatible bedfellows: Enriching grammar pedagogical tasks with cognitive linguistics to teach present simple vs. progressive
title_sort compatible bedfellows enriching grammar pedagogical tasks with cognitive linguistics to teach present simple vs progressive
topic cognitive linguistics
grammar teaching
present progressive
present simple
task-based instruction
url https://jrl.ui.ac.ir/article_28540_904fbf32290c57f104137e04419c0f6a.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mojtabamaghsoudi compatiblebedfellowsenrichinggrammarpedagogicaltaskswithcognitivelinguisticstoteachpresentsimplevsprogressive
AT abolfazlkhodamoradi compatiblebedfellowsenrichinggrammarpedagogicaltaskswithcognitivelinguisticstoteachpresentsimplevsprogressive