Percutaneous Compression Plate versus Dynamic Hip Screw for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Meta-Analyse of Five Randomized Controlled Trials
Background. Percutaneous compression plating (PCCP) has been advocated to reduce blood loss, relieve pain, and lead to faster rehabilitation for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to estimate the outcomes and complications of the PCCP versus dynamic h...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2014-01-01
|
Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/512512 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832556962527576064 |
---|---|
author | Lei Zhang Jie Shen Shengpeng Yu Qiang Huang Zhao Xie |
author_facet | Lei Zhang Jie Shen Shengpeng Yu Qiang Huang Zhao Xie |
author_sort | Lei Zhang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background. Percutaneous compression plating (PCCP) has been advocated to reduce blood loss, relieve pain, and lead to faster rehabilitation for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to estimate the outcomes and complications of the PCCP versus dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation for intertrochanteric fractures. Methods. All randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compared PCCP with DHS in treating adult patients with intertrochanteric fractures were included. Main outcomes were collected and analysed using the RevMan 5.1 version. Results. Five trials met the inclusion criteria. Compared with DHS, PCCP had similar operation time (95% CI: −26.01~4.05, P = 0.15), length of hospitalization (95% CI: −1.79~1.25, P = 0.73), mortality (95% CI: 0.37~1.02, P = 0.06), incidence of implant-related complications (95% CI: 0.29~1.82, P = 0.49), and reoperation rate (95% CI: 0.41~3.05, P = 0.83). But blood loss (95% CI: −173.84~−4.81, P = 0.04) and transfusion need (95% CI: −0.53~−0.07, P = 0.01) significantly favored the PCCP. Conclusions. The PCCP was associated with reduced blood loss and less transfusion need, but similar to DHS in other respects. Owing to the limitations of this systematic review, more high-quality RCTs are still needed to assess the clinical efficiency of PCCP. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-8a64fc02ce054b5eaff574e6e77c28cc |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2356-6140 1537-744X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | The Scientific World Journal |
spelling | doaj-art-8a64fc02ce054b5eaff574e6e77c28cc2025-02-03T05:43:54ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2014-01-01201410.1155/2014/512512512512Percutaneous Compression Plate versus Dynamic Hip Screw for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Meta-Analyse of Five Randomized Controlled TrialsLei Zhang0Jie Shen1Shengpeng Yu2Qiang Huang3Zhao Xie4National & Regional United Engineering Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, ChinaNational & Regional United Engineering Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, ChinaNational & Regional United Engineering Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, ChinaNational & Regional United Engineering Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, ChinaNational & Regional United Engineering Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Department of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, ChinaBackground. Percutaneous compression plating (PCCP) has been advocated to reduce blood loss, relieve pain, and lead to faster rehabilitation for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to estimate the outcomes and complications of the PCCP versus dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation for intertrochanteric fractures. Methods. All randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compared PCCP with DHS in treating adult patients with intertrochanteric fractures were included. Main outcomes were collected and analysed using the RevMan 5.1 version. Results. Five trials met the inclusion criteria. Compared with DHS, PCCP had similar operation time (95% CI: −26.01~4.05, P = 0.15), length of hospitalization (95% CI: −1.79~1.25, P = 0.73), mortality (95% CI: 0.37~1.02, P = 0.06), incidence of implant-related complications (95% CI: 0.29~1.82, P = 0.49), and reoperation rate (95% CI: 0.41~3.05, P = 0.83). But blood loss (95% CI: −173.84~−4.81, P = 0.04) and transfusion need (95% CI: −0.53~−0.07, P = 0.01) significantly favored the PCCP. Conclusions. The PCCP was associated with reduced blood loss and less transfusion need, but similar to DHS in other respects. Owing to the limitations of this systematic review, more high-quality RCTs are still needed to assess the clinical efficiency of PCCP.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/512512 |
spellingShingle | Lei Zhang Jie Shen Shengpeng Yu Qiang Huang Zhao Xie Percutaneous Compression Plate versus Dynamic Hip Screw for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Meta-Analyse of Five Randomized Controlled Trials The Scientific World Journal |
title | Percutaneous Compression Plate versus Dynamic Hip Screw for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Meta-Analyse of Five Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Percutaneous Compression Plate versus Dynamic Hip Screw for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Meta-Analyse of Five Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Percutaneous Compression Plate versus Dynamic Hip Screw for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Meta-Analyse of Five Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Percutaneous Compression Plate versus Dynamic Hip Screw for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Meta-Analyse of Five Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Percutaneous Compression Plate versus Dynamic Hip Screw for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Meta-Analyse of Five Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | percutaneous compression plate versus dynamic hip screw for treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures a meta analyse of five randomized controlled trials |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/512512 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leizhang percutaneouscompressionplateversusdynamichipscrewfortreatmentofintertrochanterichipfracturesametaanalyseoffiverandomizedcontrolledtrials AT jieshen percutaneouscompressionplateversusdynamichipscrewfortreatmentofintertrochanterichipfracturesametaanalyseoffiverandomizedcontrolledtrials AT shengpengyu percutaneouscompressionplateversusdynamichipscrewfortreatmentofintertrochanterichipfracturesametaanalyseoffiverandomizedcontrolledtrials AT qianghuang percutaneouscompressionplateversusdynamichipscrewfortreatmentofintertrochanterichipfracturesametaanalyseoffiverandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhaoxie percutaneouscompressionplateversusdynamichipscrewfortreatmentofintertrochanterichipfracturesametaanalyseoffiverandomizedcontrolledtrials |