The Effects of Different Challenge-Level Balance Tasks on Stroke Cortical Responses and Balance Assessment Using EEG

Previous studies have validated that different balance tasks induce different cortical responses, which are key indexes of balance assessment. Assessing balance is crucial for stroke survivors to prevent falls and improve rehabilitation outcomes. However, it was unclear whether these tasks may affec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rui Xu, Yu Bai, Jun Liang, Ningning Wang, Yongzheng He, Lin Meng, Dong Ming
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2025-01-01
Series:IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10843255/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832088027959132160
author Rui Xu
Yu Bai
Jun Liang
Ningning Wang
Yongzheng He
Lin Meng
Dong Ming
author_facet Rui Xu
Yu Bai
Jun Liang
Ningning Wang
Yongzheng He
Lin Meng
Dong Ming
author_sort Rui Xu
collection DOAJ
description Previous studies have validated that different balance tasks induce different cortical responses, which are key indexes of balance assessment. Assessing balance is crucial for stroke survivors to prevent falls and improve rehabilitation outcomes. However, it was unclear whether these tasks may affect the balance assessment, particularly regarding the relationship between task difficulty and the corresponding cortical responses involved in balance control. Therefore, we sought to explore the effects of different challenge-level balance tasks on balance assessment. Eighteen participants with stroke and thirteen healthy individuals were recruited in this study. The EEG was collected during sitting, standing and perturbation tasks. The pairwise-derived Brain Symmetry Index (pdBSI), and Granger Causality (GC) were analyzed with a two-way (task <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula> group) RMANOVA. Finally, a multiple linear regression analysis was applied to predict the BBS score with the above parameters. We found a significant interaction effect on pdBSI and GC. In the frontal lobe, participants with stroke exhibited significantly higher pdBSI (standing: p =0.042, perturbation: p =0.013) and lower GC (standing: p &#x003C;0.001, perturbation: p =0.028) compared to healthy controls. Similarly, in the parietal lobe, stroke survivors showed markedly higher pdBSI (standing: p =0.006, perturbation: p=0.012) and lower GC (standing: p=0.030, perturbation: p=0.011). Finally, The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) scores could be reliably predicted using parietal BSI and frontal GC metrics recorded during standing (p &#x003C;0.001, adjusted R<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^{{2}}=0.938$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) and perturbation tasks (p =0.001, adjusted R<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^{{2}}=0.644$ </tex-math></inline-formula>). It was discovered that the more challenging balance tasks better revealed the difference in the power distribution and the directional functional connection between groups. The pdBSI and GC during standing and perturbation tasks, could be used as biomarkers for stroke balance assessment.
format Article
id doaj-art-893ec235f79246a68bed52e7fdd2c670
institution Kabale University
issn 1534-4320
1558-0210
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher IEEE
record_format Article
series IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
spelling doaj-art-893ec235f79246a68bed52e7fdd2c6702025-02-06T00:00:10ZengIEEEIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering1534-43201558-02102025-01-013364065210.1109/TNSRE.2025.352989010843255The Effects of Different Challenge-Level Balance Tasks on Stroke Cortical Responses and Balance Assessment Using EEGRui Xu0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2298-7582Yu Bai1https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0415-3404Jun Liang2Ningning Wang3Yongzheng He4Lin Meng5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9787-9936Dong Ming6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8192-2538Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, ChinaAcademy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, ChinaAcademy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, ChinaAcademy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, ChinaXiangyu Medical, Henan, ChinaAcademy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, ChinaAcademy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin, ChinaPrevious studies have validated that different balance tasks induce different cortical responses, which are key indexes of balance assessment. Assessing balance is crucial for stroke survivors to prevent falls and improve rehabilitation outcomes. However, it was unclear whether these tasks may affect the balance assessment, particularly regarding the relationship between task difficulty and the corresponding cortical responses involved in balance control. Therefore, we sought to explore the effects of different challenge-level balance tasks on balance assessment. Eighteen participants with stroke and thirteen healthy individuals were recruited in this study. The EEG was collected during sitting, standing and perturbation tasks. The pairwise-derived Brain Symmetry Index (pdBSI), and Granger Causality (GC) were analyzed with a two-way (task <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\times $ </tex-math></inline-formula> group) RMANOVA. Finally, a multiple linear regression analysis was applied to predict the BBS score with the above parameters. We found a significant interaction effect on pdBSI and GC. In the frontal lobe, participants with stroke exhibited significantly higher pdBSI (standing: p =0.042, perturbation: p =0.013) and lower GC (standing: p &#x003C;0.001, perturbation: p =0.028) compared to healthy controls. Similarly, in the parietal lobe, stroke survivors showed markedly higher pdBSI (standing: p =0.006, perturbation: p=0.012) and lower GC (standing: p=0.030, perturbation: p=0.011). Finally, The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) scores could be reliably predicted using parietal BSI and frontal GC metrics recorded during standing (p &#x003C;0.001, adjusted R<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^{{2}}=0.938$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) and perturbation tasks (p =0.001, adjusted R<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$^{{2}}=0.644$ </tex-math></inline-formula>). It was discovered that the more challenging balance tasks better revealed the difference in the power distribution and the directional functional connection between groups. The pdBSI and GC during standing and perturbation tasks, could be used as biomarkers for stroke balance assessment.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10843255/Balance assessmentbrain symmetryGranger causalitystrokebalance task
spellingShingle Rui Xu
Yu Bai
Jun Liang
Ningning Wang
Yongzheng He
Lin Meng
Dong Ming
The Effects of Different Challenge-Level Balance Tasks on Stroke Cortical Responses and Balance Assessment Using EEG
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Balance assessment
brain symmetry
Granger causality
stroke
balance task
title The Effects of Different Challenge-Level Balance Tasks on Stroke Cortical Responses and Balance Assessment Using EEG
title_full The Effects of Different Challenge-Level Balance Tasks on Stroke Cortical Responses and Balance Assessment Using EEG
title_fullStr The Effects of Different Challenge-Level Balance Tasks on Stroke Cortical Responses and Balance Assessment Using EEG
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Different Challenge-Level Balance Tasks on Stroke Cortical Responses and Balance Assessment Using EEG
title_short The Effects of Different Challenge-Level Balance Tasks on Stroke Cortical Responses and Balance Assessment Using EEG
title_sort effects of different challenge level balance tasks on stroke cortical responses and balance assessment using eeg
topic Balance assessment
brain symmetry
Granger causality
stroke
balance task
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10843255/
work_keys_str_mv AT ruixu theeffectsofdifferentchallengelevelbalancetasksonstrokecorticalresponsesandbalanceassessmentusingeeg
AT yubai theeffectsofdifferentchallengelevelbalancetasksonstrokecorticalresponsesandbalanceassessmentusingeeg
AT junliang theeffectsofdifferentchallengelevelbalancetasksonstrokecorticalresponsesandbalanceassessmentusingeeg
AT ningningwang theeffectsofdifferentchallengelevelbalancetasksonstrokecorticalresponsesandbalanceassessmentusingeeg
AT yongzhenghe theeffectsofdifferentchallengelevelbalancetasksonstrokecorticalresponsesandbalanceassessmentusingeeg
AT linmeng theeffectsofdifferentchallengelevelbalancetasksonstrokecorticalresponsesandbalanceassessmentusingeeg
AT dongming theeffectsofdifferentchallengelevelbalancetasksonstrokecorticalresponsesandbalanceassessmentusingeeg
AT ruixu effectsofdifferentchallengelevelbalancetasksonstrokecorticalresponsesandbalanceassessmentusingeeg
AT yubai effectsofdifferentchallengelevelbalancetasksonstrokecorticalresponsesandbalanceassessmentusingeeg
AT junliang effectsofdifferentchallengelevelbalancetasksonstrokecorticalresponsesandbalanceassessmentusingeeg
AT ningningwang effectsofdifferentchallengelevelbalancetasksonstrokecorticalresponsesandbalanceassessmentusingeeg
AT yongzhenghe effectsofdifferentchallengelevelbalancetasksonstrokecorticalresponsesandbalanceassessmentusingeeg
AT linmeng effectsofdifferentchallengelevelbalancetasksonstrokecorticalresponsesandbalanceassessmentusingeeg
AT dongming effectsofdifferentchallengelevelbalancetasksonstrokecorticalresponsesandbalanceassessmentusingeeg