Comparaison entre espèces chez le primate et évolution du langage

Language is now specific to modern humans. One of the main problems regarding the evolution of language is that language does not fossilize, which makes it difficult to date its apparition in the homo lineage. However, abilities linked to language or to its use in communication can be evidenced in n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anne Reboul
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Société Francophone de Primatologie 2023-12-01
Series:Revue de Primatologie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/primatologie/16656
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832581657070141440
author Anne Reboul
author_facet Anne Reboul
author_sort Anne Reboul
collection DOAJ
description Language is now specific to modern humans. One of the main problems regarding the evolution of language is that language does not fossilize, which makes it difficult to date its apparition in the homo lineage. However, abilities linked to language or to its use in communication can be evidenced in nonhuman primates, allowing tentative dating through separations between different primate lineages. In addition, primatology data can refute theories regarding the specificity of language to modern humans. Inter-species comparison in primates can thus yield two benefits: fixing the dates for the emergence of some language components and refuting theories about why it is specific to the human species. Thus, inter-species comparison has allowed refuting Lieberman’s hypothesis, linking language specificity to modern humans to the anatomic specificity of their vocal tract. More importantly, one can try to identify in the natural communication of nonhuman primates or in laboratory experiments some components of linguistic communication such as syntax, semantic compositionality, or pragmatics. If syntax seems to be absent, connectivity and negation have been evidenced in laboratory experiments. The existence of semantic compositionality strictly speaking in the natural communication of nonhuman primates is still controversial, but on the other hand, the existence of statistical laws that had been considered as specific to language has been evidenced in the gestural and vocal communication of nonhuman primates. The investigation of nonhuman primates’ communication is a fast-developing research area, that should bring interesting perspectives on language evolution and that would benefit from targeting multimodal (gestures and vocalizations) communication in nonhuman primates.
format Article
id doaj-art-892e15bab48e4bfaadf71709989814eb
institution Kabale University
issn 2077-3757
language English
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Société Francophone de Primatologie
record_format Article
series Revue de Primatologie
spelling doaj-art-892e15bab48e4bfaadf71709989814eb2025-01-30T10:01:39ZengSociété Francophone de PrimatologieRevue de Primatologie2077-37572023-12-011410.4000/primatologie.16656Comparaison entre espèces chez le primate et évolution du langageAnne ReboulLanguage is now specific to modern humans. One of the main problems regarding the evolution of language is that language does not fossilize, which makes it difficult to date its apparition in the homo lineage. However, abilities linked to language or to its use in communication can be evidenced in nonhuman primates, allowing tentative dating through separations between different primate lineages. In addition, primatology data can refute theories regarding the specificity of language to modern humans. Inter-species comparison in primates can thus yield two benefits: fixing the dates for the emergence of some language components and refuting theories about why it is specific to the human species. Thus, inter-species comparison has allowed refuting Lieberman’s hypothesis, linking language specificity to modern humans to the anatomic specificity of their vocal tract. More importantly, one can try to identify in the natural communication of nonhuman primates or in laboratory experiments some components of linguistic communication such as syntax, semantic compositionality, or pragmatics. If syntax seems to be absent, connectivity and negation have been evidenced in laboratory experiments. The existence of semantic compositionality strictly speaking in the natural communication of nonhuman primates is still controversial, but on the other hand, the existence of statistical laws that had been considered as specific to language has been evidenced in the gestural and vocal communication of nonhuman primates. The investigation of nonhuman primates’ communication is a fast-developing research area, that should bring interesting perspectives on language evolution and that would benefit from targeting multimodal (gestures and vocalizations) communication in nonhuman primates.https://journals.openedition.org/primatologie/16656communicationInter-species comparisoncompositionalitysemanticsconnectednesslanguage evolution
spellingShingle Anne Reboul
Comparaison entre espèces chez le primate et évolution du langage
Revue de Primatologie
communication
Inter-species comparison
compositionality
semantics
connectedness
language evolution
title Comparaison entre espèces chez le primate et évolution du langage
title_full Comparaison entre espèces chez le primate et évolution du langage
title_fullStr Comparaison entre espèces chez le primate et évolution du langage
title_full_unstemmed Comparaison entre espèces chez le primate et évolution du langage
title_short Comparaison entre espèces chez le primate et évolution du langage
title_sort comparaison entre especes chez le primate et evolution du langage
topic communication
Inter-species comparison
compositionality
semantics
connectedness
language evolution
url https://journals.openedition.org/primatologie/16656
work_keys_str_mv AT annereboul comparaisonentreespeceschezleprimateetevolutiondulangage