Mental health and psychosocial support strategies in highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks of substantial public concern: A systematic scoping review.

<h4>Background</h4>Acute disease outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic cause a high burden of psychological distress in people worldwide. Interventions to enable people to better cope with such distress should be based on the best available evidence. We therefore performed a scoping re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angela M Kunzler, Jutta Stoffers-Winterling, Marlene Stoll, Alexander L Mancini, Sophie Lehmann, Manpreet Blessin, Donya Gilan, Isabella Helmreich, Frank Hufert, Klaus Lieb
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244748&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540057363283968
author Angela M Kunzler
Jutta Stoffers-Winterling
Marlene Stoll
Alexander L Mancini
Sophie Lehmann
Manpreet Blessin
Donya Gilan
Isabella Helmreich
Frank Hufert
Klaus Lieb
author_facet Angela M Kunzler
Jutta Stoffers-Winterling
Marlene Stoll
Alexander L Mancini
Sophie Lehmann
Manpreet Blessin
Donya Gilan
Isabella Helmreich
Frank Hufert
Klaus Lieb
author_sort Angela M Kunzler
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Acute disease outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic cause a high burden of psychological distress in people worldwide. Interventions to enable people to better cope with such distress should be based on the best available evidence. We therefore performed a scoping review to systematically identify and summarize the available literature of interventions that target the distress of people in the face of highly contagious disease outbreaks.<h4>Methods</h4>MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science (January 2000 to May 7, 2020), and reference lists were systematically searched and screened by two independent reviewers. Quantitative and qualitative studies investigating the effects of psychological interventions before, during, and after outbreaks of highly contagious emerging infectious diseases, such as SARS, MERS, Ebola, or COVID-19 were included. Study effects were grouped (e.g. for healthcare professionals, community members, people at risk) and intervention contents at the individual and organizational level summarized. We assessed the level of evidence using a modified scheme from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.<h4>Results</h4>Of 4030 records found, 19 studies were included (two RCTs). Most interventions were delivered during-exposure and face-to-face, focused on healthcare workers and crisis personnel, and combined psychoeducation with training of coping strategies. Based on two high-quality studies, beneficial effects were reported for resilience factors (e.g. positive cognitive appraisal) and professional attitudes of healthcare workers, with mixed findings for mental health (e.g. depression). Across all studies, there was positive qualitative feedback from participants and facilitators. We identified seven ongoing studies mostly using online- and mobile-based deliveries.<h4>Conclusions</h4>There is preliminary evidence for beneficial effects of interventions to enable people to better cope with the distress of highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks. Besides the need for more high-quality studies, the summarized evidence may inform decision makers to plan interventions during the current pandemic and to develop pandemic preparedness plans.
format Article
id doaj-art-89097ed2ef894ecab1ab5e52e24d5226
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-89097ed2ef894ecab1ab5e52e24d52262025-02-05T05:32:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01162e024474810.1371/journal.pone.0244748Mental health and psychosocial support strategies in highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks of substantial public concern: A systematic scoping review.Angela M KunzlerJutta Stoffers-WinterlingMarlene StollAlexander L ManciniSophie LehmannManpreet BlessinDonya GilanIsabella HelmreichFrank HufertKlaus Lieb<h4>Background</h4>Acute disease outbreaks such as the COVID-19 pandemic cause a high burden of psychological distress in people worldwide. Interventions to enable people to better cope with such distress should be based on the best available evidence. We therefore performed a scoping review to systematically identify and summarize the available literature of interventions that target the distress of people in the face of highly contagious disease outbreaks.<h4>Methods</h4>MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science (January 2000 to May 7, 2020), and reference lists were systematically searched and screened by two independent reviewers. Quantitative and qualitative studies investigating the effects of psychological interventions before, during, and after outbreaks of highly contagious emerging infectious diseases, such as SARS, MERS, Ebola, or COVID-19 were included. Study effects were grouped (e.g. for healthcare professionals, community members, people at risk) and intervention contents at the individual and organizational level summarized. We assessed the level of evidence using a modified scheme from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.<h4>Results</h4>Of 4030 records found, 19 studies were included (two RCTs). Most interventions were delivered during-exposure and face-to-face, focused on healthcare workers and crisis personnel, and combined psychoeducation with training of coping strategies. Based on two high-quality studies, beneficial effects were reported for resilience factors (e.g. positive cognitive appraisal) and professional attitudes of healthcare workers, with mixed findings for mental health (e.g. depression). Across all studies, there was positive qualitative feedback from participants and facilitators. We identified seven ongoing studies mostly using online- and mobile-based deliveries.<h4>Conclusions</h4>There is preliminary evidence for beneficial effects of interventions to enable people to better cope with the distress of highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks. Besides the need for more high-quality studies, the summarized evidence may inform decision makers to plan interventions during the current pandemic and to develop pandemic preparedness plans.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244748&type=printable
spellingShingle Angela M Kunzler
Jutta Stoffers-Winterling
Marlene Stoll
Alexander L Mancini
Sophie Lehmann
Manpreet Blessin
Donya Gilan
Isabella Helmreich
Frank Hufert
Klaus Lieb
Mental health and psychosocial support strategies in highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks of substantial public concern: A systematic scoping review.
PLoS ONE
title Mental health and psychosocial support strategies in highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks of substantial public concern: A systematic scoping review.
title_full Mental health and psychosocial support strategies in highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks of substantial public concern: A systematic scoping review.
title_fullStr Mental health and psychosocial support strategies in highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks of substantial public concern: A systematic scoping review.
title_full_unstemmed Mental health and psychosocial support strategies in highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks of substantial public concern: A systematic scoping review.
title_short Mental health and psychosocial support strategies in highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks of substantial public concern: A systematic scoping review.
title_sort mental health and psychosocial support strategies in highly contagious emerging disease outbreaks of substantial public concern a systematic scoping review
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244748&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT angelamkunzler mentalhealthandpsychosocialsupportstrategiesinhighlycontagiousemergingdiseaseoutbreaksofsubstantialpublicconcernasystematicscopingreview
AT juttastofferswinterling mentalhealthandpsychosocialsupportstrategiesinhighlycontagiousemergingdiseaseoutbreaksofsubstantialpublicconcernasystematicscopingreview
AT marlenestoll mentalhealthandpsychosocialsupportstrategiesinhighlycontagiousemergingdiseaseoutbreaksofsubstantialpublicconcernasystematicscopingreview
AT alexanderlmancini mentalhealthandpsychosocialsupportstrategiesinhighlycontagiousemergingdiseaseoutbreaksofsubstantialpublicconcernasystematicscopingreview
AT sophielehmann mentalhealthandpsychosocialsupportstrategiesinhighlycontagiousemergingdiseaseoutbreaksofsubstantialpublicconcernasystematicscopingreview
AT manpreetblessin mentalhealthandpsychosocialsupportstrategiesinhighlycontagiousemergingdiseaseoutbreaksofsubstantialpublicconcernasystematicscopingreview
AT donyagilan mentalhealthandpsychosocialsupportstrategiesinhighlycontagiousemergingdiseaseoutbreaksofsubstantialpublicconcernasystematicscopingreview
AT isabellahelmreich mentalhealthandpsychosocialsupportstrategiesinhighlycontagiousemergingdiseaseoutbreaksofsubstantialpublicconcernasystematicscopingreview
AT frankhufert mentalhealthandpsychosocialsupportstrategiesinhighlycontagiousemergingdiseaseoutbreaksofsubstantialpublicconcernasystematicscopingreview
AT klauslieb mentalhealthandpsychosocialsupportstrategiesinhighlycontagiousemergingdiseaseoutbreaksofsubstantialpublicconcernasystematicscopingreview