Motion – Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Is More Cost-Effective than Oral PPI Administration: Arguments against the Motion
Discussion of the cost effectiveness of medical and surgical treatments of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is plagued by a number of logical fallacies. Several of these defects in reasoning are reviewed. For example, it is inappropriate to compare the costs of therapies unless they are equall...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Amnon Sonnenberg |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2002-01-01
|
Series: | Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2002/190427 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Motion – Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Is More Cost Effective Than Oral PPI Administration: Arguments for the Motion
by: Lee L Swanström
Published: (2002-01-01) -
Motion - Colonoscopic Surveillance is more Cost Effective than Colectomy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Arguments Against the Motion
by: Anders Ekbom
Published: (2003-01-01) -
The Stretta Procedure Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors and Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication in the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
by: Dan Comay, et al.
Published: (2008-01-01) -
Motion – The Available Treatments for Hepatitis C Are Cost Effective: Arguments against the Motion
by: W Ray Kim
Published: (2002-01-01) -
Gastric Perforation and Pancreatitis Manifesting after an Inadvertent Nissen Fundoplication in a Patient with Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome
by: Mikael Petrosyan, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)