The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts

As a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpow...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: S. V. Korostelev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration 2020-09-01
Series:Управленческое консультирование
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1483
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849764719997485056
author S. V. Korostelev
author_facet S. V. Korostelev
author_sort S. V. Korostelev
collection DOAJ
description As a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpowered to ensure victory in the conflict are currently in the private sector and out of state control. Also, an essential feature of the information confrontation is that in the vast majority of situations, the direct perpetrator of an information attack cannot be identified immediately and to a large extent due to the fact that “military” conflicts in cyberspace in the context of international relations can be “embedded” in various forms of struggle for power: political, economic, informational, technological, media and ideological, etc. That is, a significant number of participants in ordinary everyday life implicit activities in all walks of life from all over the globe can be not only indirect but also direct participants of informational conflict.In the digital era, targets selected for destruction can have completely different and unexpected properties, which leads to the existence of a significant number of approaches to the classification of targets of informational impact. Force is used against physical and virtual objects in the physical, informational and cognitive dimensions.The complexity of assessing the physical damage inflicted on states, and their population in the cognitive sphere conformably, and relating it with the practice of assigning international responsibility for the use of traditional means of warfare makes it impossible to form any adequate universal international political and legal regime for countering information threats in the near future. The elimination of threats in cyberspace is a common interest in ensuring international stability, but at present it can be carried out by states only on their own.A statement of the specified list of unacceptable aggressive actions carried out through information influences in the federal legislation will be, in essence, a preventive measure, since it will establish a threshold restriction for other international actors to interfere in the internal affairs of the state from outside.
format Article
id doaj-art-88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad783
institution DOAJ
issn 1726-1139
1816-8590
language English
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher North-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
record_format Article
series Управленческое консультирование
spelling doaj-art-88b2d7a62efa4a2b84a4fcbbbbcad7832025-08-20T03:05:04ZengNorth-West institute of management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationУправленческое консультирование1726-11391816-85902020-09-0108556610.22394/1726-1139-2020-8-55-661321The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational ConflictsS. V. Korostelev0Secretariat of the Council of the Interparliamentary Assembly of the Commonwealth of Independent StatesAs a result of changes in the technological tenor and congruous with it organization of the world economy, serious changes have occurred in the gradation of participants in armed conflicts. Firstly, the warring parties are not only states now. Secondly, the vast majority of the targets to be overpowered to ensure victory in the conflict are currently in the private sector and out of state control. Also, an essential feature of the information confrontation is that in the vast majority of situations, the direct perpetrator of an information attack cannot be identified immediately and to a large extent due to the fact that “military” conflicts in cyberspace in the context of international relations can be “embedded” in various forms of struggle for power: political, economic, informational, technological, media and ideological, etc. That is, a significant number of participants in ordinary everyday life implicit activities in all walks of life from all over the globe can be not only indirect but also direct participants of informational conflict.In the digital era, targets selected for destruction can have completely different and unexpected properties, which leads to the existence of a significant number of approaches to the classification of targets of informational impact. Force is used against physical and virtual objects in the physical, informational and cognitive dimensions.The complexity of assessing the physical damage inflicted on states, and their population in the cognitive sphere conformably, and relating it with the practice of assigning international responsibility for the use of traditional means of warfare makes it impossible to form any adequate universal international political and legal regime for countering information threats in the near future. The elimination of threats in cyberspace is a common interest in ensuring international stability, but at present it can be carried out by states only on their own.A statement of the specified list of unacceptable aggressive actions carried out through information influences in the federal legislation will be, in essence, a preventive measure, since it will establish a threshold restriction for other international actors to interfere in the internal affairs of the state from outside.https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1483cyberspacetargets in informational confrontationuse of forcecognitive dimensioninternational responsibilityinternational humanitarian law
spellingShingle S. V. Korostelev
The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts
Управленческое консультирование
cyberspace
targets in informational confrontation
use of force
cognitive dimension
international responsibility
international humanitarian law
title The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts
title_full The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts
title_fullStr The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts
title_full_unstemmed The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts
title_short The Problem of Classification of Targets in Informational Conflicts
title_sort problem of classification of targets in informational conflicts
topic cyberspace
targets in informational confrontation
use of force
cognitive dimension
international responsibility
international humanitarian law
url https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/view/1483
work_keys_str_mv AT svkorostelev theproblemofclassificationoftargetsininformationalconflicts
AT svkorostelev problemofclassificationoftargetsininformationalconflicts