Folk Religion in Discourse and Practice

‘Folk religion’ is a contested category within the study of religions, with scholars increasingly advocating its abandonment. This paper encourages a new critical engagement with ‘folk religion’ as both a category of analysis and as a field of practice. I argue for a renewed attentiveness to the ide...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James Alexander Kapaló
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2013-09-01
Series:Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jef.ee/index.php/journal/article/view/116
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832572886731194368
author James Alexander Kapaló
author_facet James Alexander Kapaló
author_sort James Alexander Kapaló
collection DOAJ
description ‘Folk religion’ is a contested category within the study of religions, with scholars increasingly advocating its abandonment. This paper encourages a new critical engagement with ‘folk religion’ as both a category of analysis and as a field of practice. I argue for a renewed attentiveness to the ideological dimensions of categories deployed by scholars and to the relationship they bear to the field of practice they seek to signify. Firstly, I explore the discursive nature of the construction of ‘folk religion’ as a category of analysis and how its semantic loading functions to ‘pick up’ distinctive practices from the religious field. Secondly, drawing on the work of Bourdieu and Riesebrodt, I characterise the ‘folk religious field of practice’ as relational, a shifting site of competing agencies. My argument is illustrated with empirical examples drawn from ethnographic research in Romania and Moldova.
format Article
id doaj-art-886e16d5684a47fa99a75610045c2b92
institution Kabale University
issn 1736-6518
2228-0987
language English
publishDate 2013-09-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics
spelling doaj-art-886e16d5684a47fa99a75610045c2b922025-02-02T06:19:21ZengSciendoJournal of Ethnology and Folkloristics1736-65182228-09872013-09-017131892Folk Religion in Discourse and PracticeJames Alexander Kapaló0Study of Religions Department University College Cork O’Rahilly Building, Cork, Ireland‘Folk religion’ is a contested category within the study of religions, with scholars increasingly advocating its abandonment. This paper encourages a new critical engagement with ‘folk religion’ as both a category of analysis and as a field of practice. I argue for a renewed attentiveness to the ideological dimensions of categories deployed by scholars and to the relationship they bear to the field of practice they seek to signify. Firstly, I explore the discursive nature of the construction of ‘folk religion’ as a category of analysis and how its semantic loading functions to ‘pick up’ distinctive practices from the religious field. Secondly, drawing on the work of Bourdieu and Riesebrodt, I characterise the ‘folk religious field of practice’ as relational, a shifting site of competing agencies. My argument is illustrated with empirical examples drawn from ethnographic research in Romania and Moldova.https://www.jef.ee/index.php/journal/article/view/116folk religionvernacular religionRomaniaBourdieuRiesebrodt
spellingShingle James Alexander Kapaló
Folk Religion in Discourse and Practice
Journal of Ethnology and Folkloristics
folk religion
vernacular religion
Romania
Bourdieu
Riesebrodt
title Folk Religion in Discourse and Practice
title_full Folk Religion in Discourse and Practice
title_fullStr Folk Religion in Discourse and Practice
title_full_unstemmed Folk Religion in Discourse and Practice
title_short Folk Religion in Discourse and Practice
title_sort folk religion in discourse and practice
topic folk religion
vernacular religion
Romania
Bourdieu
Riesebrodt
url https://www.jef.ee/index.php/journal/article/view/116
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesalexanderkapalo folkreligionindiscourseandpractice