Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study

Background Most calls to ambulance result in emergency ambulance dispatch (direct dispatch) following primary telephone triage. Ambulance Victoria uses clinician-led secondary telephone triage for patients identified as low-acuity during primary triage to refer them to alternative care pathways; how...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Cameron, Kathryn Eastwood, Dhanya Nambiar, Rosamond Dwyer, Judy A Lowthian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e042351.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850221538207334400
author Peter Cameron
Kathryn Eastwood
Dhanya Nambiar
Rosamond Dwyer
Judy A Lowthian
author_facet Peter Cameron
Kathryn Eastwood
Dhanya Nambiar
Rosamond Dwyer
Judy A Lowthian
author_sort Peter Cameron
collection DOAJ
description Background Most calls to ambulance result in emergency ambulance dispatch (direct dispatch) following primary telephone triage. Ambulance Victoria uses clinician-led secondary telephone triage for patients identified as low-acuity during primary triage to refer them to alternative care pathways; however, some are returned for ambulance dispatch (secondary dispatch). Older adult patients are frequent users of ambulance services; however, little is known about the appropriateness of subsequent secondary dispatches.Objectives To examine the appropriateness of secondary dispatch through a comparison of the characteristics and ambulance outcomes of older patients dispatched an emergency ambulance via direct or secondary dispatch.Design A retrospective cohort study of ambulance patient data between September 2009 and June 2012 was conducted.Setting The secondary telephone triage service operated in metropolitan Melbourne, Victoria, Australia during the study period.Participants There were 90 086 patients included aged 65 years and over who had an emergency ambulance dispatch via direct or secondary dispatch with one of the five most common secondary dispatch paramedic diagnoses.Main outcome measures Descriptive analyses compared characteristics, treatment and transportation rates between direct and secondary dispatch patients.Results The dispatch groups were similar in demographics, vital signs and hospital transportation rates. However, secondary dispatch patients were half as likely to be treated by paramedics (OR 0.51; CI 0.48 to 0.55; p<0.001). Increasing age was associated with decreasing treatment (p<0.005) and increasing transportation rates (p<0.005).Conclusion Secondary triage could identify patients who would ultimately be transported to an emergency department. However, the lower paramedic treatment rates suggest many secondary dispatch patients may have been suitable for referral to alternative low-acuity transport or referral options.
format Article
id doaj-art-87b7ef8bc41d4de09888959a711959dc
institution OA Journals
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-87b7ef8bc41d4de09888959a711959dc2025-08-20T02:06:43ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-11-01101110.1136/bmjopen-2020-042351Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort studyPeter Cameron0Kathryn Eastwood1Dhanya Nambiar2Rosamond Dwyer3Judy A Lowthian41 School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaEpidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, AustraliaDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia1 Global and Women’s Health, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia4 Bolton Clarke Research Institute, Bolton Clarke, Forrest Hill, Victoria, AustraliaBackground Most calls to ambulance result in emergency ambulance dispatch (direct dispatch) following primary telephone triage. Ambulance Victoria uses clinician-led secondary telephone triage for patients identified as low-acuity during primary triage to refer them to alternative care pathways; however, some are returned for ambulance dispatch (secondary dispatch). Older adult patients are frequent users of ambulance services; however, little is known about the appropriateness of subsequent secondary dispatches.Objectives To examine the appropriateness of secondary dispatch through a comparison of the characteristics and ambulance outcomes of older patients dispatched an emergency ambulance via direct or secondary dispatch.Design A retrospective cohort study of ambulance patient data between September 2009 and June 2012 was conducted.Setting The secondary telephone triage service operated in metropolitan Melbourne, Victoria, Australia during the study period.Participants There were 90 086 patients included aged 65 years and over who had an emergency ambulance dispatch via direct or secondary dispatch with one of the five most common secondary dispatch paramedic diagnoses.Main outcome measures Descriptive analyses compared characteristics, treatment and transportation rates between direct and secondary dispatch patients.Results The dispatch groups were similar in demographics, vital signs and hospital transportation rates. However, secondary dispatch patients were half as likely to be treated by paramedics (OR 0.51; CI 0.48 to 0.55; p<0.001). Increasing age was associated with decreasing treatment (p<0.005) and increasing transportation rates (p<0.005).Conclusion Secondary triage could identify patients who would ultimately be transported to an emergency department. However, the lower paramedic treatment rates suggest many secondary dispatch patients may have been suitable for referral to alternative low-acuity transport or referral options.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e042351.full
spellingShingle Peter Cameron
Kathryn Eastwood
Dhanya Nambiar
Rosamond Dwyer
Judy A Lowthian
Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study
BMJ Open
title Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort ambulance dispatch of older patients following primary and secondary telephone triage in metropolitan melbourne australia a retrospective cohort study
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e042351.full
work_keys_str_mv AT petercameron ambulancedispatchofolderpatientsfollowingprimaryandsecondarytelephonetriageinmetropolitanmelbourneaustraliaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kathryneastwood ambulancedispatchofolderpatientsfollowingprimaryandsecondarytelephonetriageinmetropolitanmelbourneaustraliaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT dhanyanambiar ambulancedispatchofolderpatientsfollowingprimaryandsecondarytelephonetriageinmetropolitanmelbourneaustraliaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT rosamonddwyer ambulancedispatchofolderpatientsfollowingprimaryandsecondarytelephonetriageinmetropolitanmelbourneaustraliaaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT judyalowthian ambulancedispatchofolderpatientsfollowingprimaryandsecondarytelephonetriageinmetropolitanmelbourneaustraliaaretrospectivecohortstudy