Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts

Objective: Although cognitive behavioral model of Internet addiction has been well described, studies on metacognitions and ruminative response styles related with Internet addiction are very limited. The aim of the present study was to compare metacognitions and ruminative response style in Interne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ömer ÞENORMANCI, Ramazan KONKAN, Oya GÜÇLÜ, Güliz ÞENORMANCI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kare Publishing 2013-12-01
Series:Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://77-1390243983.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832544349744791552
author Ömer ÞENORMANCI
Ramazan KONKAN
Oya GÜÇLÜ
Güliz ÞENORMANCI
author_facet Ömer ÞENORMANCI
Ramazan KONKAN
Oya GÜÇLÜ
Güliz ÞENORMANCI
author_sort Ömer ÞENORMANCI
collection DOAJ
description Objective: Although cognitive behavioral model of Internet addiction has been well described, studies on metacognitions and ruminative response styles related with Internet addiction are very limited. The aim of the present study was to compare metacognitions and ruminative response style in Internet addicts with a healthy control group. Method: The study included 30 males who presented to our Internet Addiction Outpatient clinic, and diagnosed with Internet addiction, and a control group of 30 healthy males with similar sociodemographic characteristics. A sociodemographic data form, Internet Addiction Test (IAT), Metacognitions Questionnaire (MCQ-30), Ruminative Response Scale-short version (RRS-SV), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were used for data collection. Results: The MCQ-30 total, MCQ-30 uncontrollability and danger score, MCQ-30 need to control thoughts score and RRS-SV scores statistically significantly higher in study group compared the control group. After correcting for BDI by ANCOVA, the difference between MCQ-30 total score and RRS-SV disappeared. Conclusion: Internet addicts show ruminative responses instead of having an effective problem-solving attitude and defining problems; and this self-focused rumination leads an individual to recall more reinforced memories about the Internet so that the problem of Internet addiction becomes deeper. As a result of this study, although Internet addiction is accompanied by depression primarily or secondarily, manifestation of Internet addiction is exacerbated by depression through ruminative responses and metacognitions. [JCBPR 2013; 2(3.000): 167-172]
format Article
id doaj-art-86f47ee23f5547a9b5c7c832d4a6f2f0
institution Kabale University
issn 2146-9490
language English
publishDate 2013-12-01
publisher Kare Publishing
record_format Article
series Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Dergisi
spelling doaj-art-86f47ee23f5547a9b5c7c832d4a6f2f02025-02-03T10:31:36ZengKare PublishingBilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Dergisi2146-94902013-12-0123167172150658Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet AddictsÖmer ÞENORMANCIRamazan KONKANOya GÜÇLÜGüliz ÞENORMANCIObjective: Although cognitive behavioral model of Internet addiction has been well described, studies on metacognitions and ruminative response styles related with Internet addiction are very limited. The aim of the present study was to compare metacognitions and ruminative response style in Internet addicts with a healthy control group. Method: The study included 30 males who presented to our Internet Addiction Outpatient clinic, and diagnosed with Internet addiction, and a control group of 30 healthy males with similar sociodemographic characteristics. A sociodemographic data form, Internet Addiction Test (IAT), Metacognitions Questionnaire (MCQ-30), Ruminative Response Scale-short version (RRS-SV), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were used for data collection. Results: The MCQ-30 total, MCQ-30 uncontrollability and danger score, MCQ-30 need to control thoughts score and RRS-SV scores statistically significantly higher in study group compared the control group. After correcting for BDI by ANCOVA, the difference between MCQ-30 total score and RRS-SV disappeared. Conclusion: Internet addicts show ruminative responses instead of having an effective problem-solving attitude and defining problems; and this self-focused rumination leads an individual to recall more reinforced memories about the Internet so that the problem of Internet addiction becomes deeper. As a result of this study, although Internet addiction is accompanied by depression primarily or secondarily, manifestation of Internet addiction is exacerbated by depression through ruminative responses and metacognitions. [JCBPR 2013; 2(3.000): 167-172]77-1390243983.pdfInternetaddictioncognitionmetacognitionruminative response styles
spellingShingle Ömer ÞENORMANCI
Ramazan KONKAN
Oya GÜÇLÜ
Güliz ÞENORMANCI
Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts
Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Dergisi
Internet
addiction
cognition
metacognition
ruminative response styles
title Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts
title_full Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts
title_fullStr Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts
title_full_unstemmed Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts
title_short Ruminative Response Styles and Metacognitions in Internet Addicts
title_sort ruminative response styles and metacognitions in internet addicts
topic Internet
addiction
cognition
metacognition
ruminative response styles
url http://77-1390243983.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT oumlmerthornenormanci ruminativeresponsestylesandmetacognitionsininternetaddicts
AT ramazankonkan ruminativeresponsestylesandmetacognitionsininternetaddicts
AT oyaguumlccedilluuml ruminativeresponsestylesandmetacognitionsininternetaddicts
AT guumllizthornenormanci ruminativeresponsestylesandmetacognitionsininternetaddicts