Mental Health Services for Serious Mental Illness: Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
ABSTRACT Aims This review aims to classify the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on mental health services (MHS) for people with serious mental illness (SMI) available in the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's (CSzG) specialised register. Design Scoping review. Methods We retrieved...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Nursing Open |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70100 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832577753128370176 |
|---|---|
| author | Pablo Roson Rodriguez Xiao Chen Marcelo Arancibia Eva Madrid Farhad Shokraneh Clive E. Adams Juan Víctor Ariel Franco |
| author_facet | Pablo Roson Rodriguez Xiao Chen Marcelo Arancibia Eva Madrid Farhad Shokraneh Clive E. Adams Juan Víctor Ariel Franco |
| author_sort | Pablo Roson Rodriguez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Aims This review aims to classify the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on mental health services (MHS) for people with serious mental illness (SMI) available in the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's (CSzG) specialised register. Design Scoping review. Methods We retrieved and screened RCTs of service‐level interventions considering non‐pharmacological approaches for mental healthcare of the CSzG register. We classified and collected the main characteristics of the RCTs using a customised data extraction and charting form based on DESDE‐LTS classification. Results We included 233 out of 262 total trial registries. Most of the studies were conducted in China, 136 (58%), 57 (24%) North America and 26 (11%) Europe. We classified the studies as ambulatory assistance 80 (34%), day services/out‐patient care 38 (16%), residential services 44 (19%), accessibility to care 19 (8%), information/assessment 39 (17%), self‐help and voluntary help 10 (4%), e‐health 52 (22%), and discharge services 17 (7%). Conclusions We found a large number of trials that investigated the effects of mental health services for people with SMI. Trials classification was difficult due to the poor report of the characteristics of these complex interventions. This database can be used to plan and prioritise systematic reviews according to the needs of stakeholders. Relevance Statement The study is of interest to mental health nursing because it studies the different services in which nurses play a fundamental role with implications in the nursing practice, education, research or leadership and management. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-86d20ebe661c4828a32cf943c93df98f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2054-1058 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Nursing Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-86d20ebe661c4828a32cf943c93df98f2025-01-30T16:40:37ZengWileyNursing Open2054-10582025-01-01121n/an/a10.1002/nop2.70100Mental Health Services for Serious Mental Illness: Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled TrialsPablo Roson Rodriguez0Xiao Chen1Marcelo Arancibia2Eva Madrid3Farhad Shokraneh4Clive E. Adams5Juan Víctor Ariel Franco6Research Department Cochrane Argentina Associate Centre—Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires Buenos Aires ArgentinaMinerva Schools at Keck Graduate Institute San Francisco California USAInterdisciplinary Centre for Health Studies (CIESAL) Universidad de Valparaíso, Cochrane Chile Associate Centre, Viña del Mar Valparaiso ChileInterdisciplinary Centre for Health Studies (CIESAL) Universidad de Valparaíso, Cochrane Chile Associate Centre, Viña del Mar Valparaiso ChileCochrane Schizophrenia, Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham UKCochrane Schizophrenia, Institute of Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine University of Nottingham Nottingham UKInstitute of General Practice Medical Faculty of the Heinrich‐Heine‐University Düsseldorf Düsseldorf GermanyABSTRACT Aims This review aims to classify the evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on mental health services (MHS) for people with serious mental illness (SMI) available in the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's (CSzG) specialised register. Design Scoping review. Methods We retrieved and screened RCTs of service‐level interventions considering non‐pharmacological approaches for mental healthcare of the CSzG register. We classified and collected the main characteristics of the RCTs using a customised data extraction and charting form based on DESDE‐LTS classification. Results We included 233 out of 262 total trial registries. Most of the studies were conducted in China, 136 (58%), 57 (24%) North America and 26 (11%) Europe. We classified the studies as ambulatory assistance 80 (34%), day services/out‐patient care 38 (16%), residential services 44 (19%), accessibility to care 19 (8%), information/assessment 39 (17%), self‐help and voluntary help 10 (4%), e‐health 52 (22%), and discharge services 17 (7%). Conclusions We found a large number of trials that investigated the effects of mental health services for people with SMI. Trials classification was difficult due to the poor report of the characteristics of these complex interventions. This database can be used to plan and prioritise systematic reviews according to the needs of stakeholders. Relevance Statement The study is of interest to mental health nursing because it studies the different services in which nurses play a fundamental role with implications in the nursing practice, education, research or leadership and management.https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70100health services deliverypublic healthrandomised trialschizophreniaservice evaluation |
| spellingShingle | Pablo Roson Rodriguez Xiao Chen Marcelo Arancibia Eva Madrid Farhad Shokraneh Clive E. Adams Juan Víctor Ariel Franco Mental Health Services for Serious Mental Illness: Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials Nursing Open health services delivery public health randomised trial schizophrenia service evaluation |
| title | Mental Health Services for Serious Mental Illness: Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials |
| title_full | Mental Health Services for Serious Mental Illness: Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials |
| title_fullStr | Mental Health Services for Serious Mental Illness: Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mental Health Services for Serious Mental Illness: Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials |
| title_short | Mental Health Services for Serious Mental Illness: Scoping Review of Randomised Controlled Trials |
| title_sort | mental health services for serious mental illness scoping review of randomised controlled trials |
| topic | health services delivery public health randomised trial schizophrenia service evaluation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70100 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pablorosonrodriguez mentalhealthservicesforseriousmentalillnessscopingreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT xiaochen mentalhealthservicesforseriousmentalillnessscopingreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT marceloarancibia mentalhealthservicesforseriousmentalillnessscopingreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT evamadrid mentalhealthservicesforseriousmentalillnessscopingreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT farhadshokraneh mentalhealthservicesforseriousmentalillnessscopingreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT cliveeadams mentalhealthservicesforseriousmentalillnessscopingreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials AT juanvictorarielfranco mentalhealthservicesforseriousmentalillnessscopingreviewofrandomisedcontrolledtrials |