Assessment of Combined Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis: A Cohort Study of 3710 Pregnancies
Objective. The current study aimed to compare the characteristics of chromosome abnormalities detected by conventional G-banding karyotyping, chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)/CNVplex analysis and further explore the application value of combined kary...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2022-01-01
|
Series: | Genetics Research |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6791439 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832551326096031744 |
---|---|
author | Jin Wang Danni Wang Yan Yin Yi Deng Mengling Ye Ping Wei Zhuo Zhang Chun Chen Shengfang Qin Xueyan Wang |
author_facet | Jin Wang Danni Wang Yan Yin Yi Deng Mengling Ye Ping Wei Zhuo Zhang Chun Chen Shengfang Qin Xueyan Wang |
author_sort | Jin Wang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective. The current study aimed to compare the characteristics of chromosome abnormalities detected by conventional G-banding karyotyping, chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)/CNVplex analysis and further explore the application value of combined karyotype analysis and CMA in prenatal diagnosis with a larger sample size. Methods. From March 2019 to March 2021, 3710 amniocentesis samples were retrospectively collected from women who accepted prenatal diagnosis at 16 to 22 + 6 weeks of pregnancy. The pregnant women underwent karyotype analysis and CMA. In the case of fetal chromosomal mosaicism, FISH or CNVplex analysis was utilized for validation. Results. In total, 3710 G-banding karyotype results and CMA results from invasive prenatal diagnosis were collected. Of these, 201 (5.41%) fetuses with an abnormal karyotype were observed. The CMA analysis showed that the abnormality rate was 9.14% (340/3710). The detection rate of CMA combined with karyotype analysis was 0.35% higher than that of CMA alone and 4.08% higher than that of karyotyping alone. Additionally, 12 cases had abnormal karyotype analysis, despite normal CMA results. To further detect the chromosome mosaicism, we used FISH analysis to correct the karyotype results of case 1. Correspondingly, a total of 157 cases showed abnormal CMA results but normal karyotype analysis. We also found chromosomal mosaicism in 4 cases using CMA. Moreover, CNVplex and CMA demonstrated that representative case 15 was mosaicism for trisomy 2. Conclusions. Conventional G-banding karyotyping and CMA have their own advantages and limitations. A combination of karyotype analysis and CMA can increase the detection rate of chromosome abnormalities and make up for the limitation of signal detection. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-8675f29958314ee397ed027b549dd43c |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1469-5073 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Genetics Research |
spelling | doaj-art-8675f29958314ee397ed027b549dd43c2025-02-03T06:01:49ZengWileyGenetics Research1469-50732022-01-01202210.1155/2022/6791439Assessment of Combined Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis: A Cohort Study of 3710 PregnanciesJin Wang0Danni Wang1Yan Yin2Yi Deng3Mengling Ye4Ping Wei5Zhuo Zhang6Chun Chen7Shengfang Qin8Xueyan Wang9Department of Medical Genetics and Prenatal DiagnosisDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal DiagnosisDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal DiagnosisDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal DiagnosisDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal DiagnosisDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal DiagnosisDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal DiagnosisDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal DiagnosisDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal DiagnosisDepartment of Medical Genetics and Prenatal DiagnosisObjective. The current study aimed to compare the characteristics of chromosome abnormalities detected by conventional G-banding karyotyping, chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)/CNVplex analysis and further explore the application value of combined karyotype analysis and CMA in prenatal diagnosis with a larger sample size. Methods. From March 2019 to March 2021, 3710 amniocentesis samples were retrospectively collected from women who accepted prenatal diagnosis at 16 to 22 + 6 weeks of pregnancy. The pregnant women underwent karyotype analysis and CMA. In the case of fetal chromosomal mosaicism, FISH or CNVplex analysis was utilized for validation. Results. In total, 3710 G-banding karyotype results and CMA results from invasive prenatal diagnosis were collected. Of these, 201 (5.41%) fetuses with an abnormal karyotype were observed. The CMA analysis showed that the abnormality rate was 9.14% (340/3710). The detection rate of CMA combined with karyotype analysis was 0.35% higher than that of CMA alone and 4.08% higher than that of karyotyping alone. Additionally, 12 cases had abnormal karyotype analysis, despite normal CMA results. To further detect the chromosome mosaicism, we used FISH analysis to correct the karyotype results of case 1. Correspondingly, a total of 157 cases showed abnormal CMA results but normal karyotype analysis. We also found chromosomal mosaicism in 4 cases using CMA. Moreover, CNVplex and CMA demonstrated that representative case 15 was mosaicism for trisomy 2. Conclusions. Conventional G-banding karyotyping and CMA have their own advantages and limitations. A combination of karyotype analysis and CMA can increase the detection rate of chromosome abnormalities and make up for the limitation of signal detection.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6791439 |
spellingShingle | Jin Wang Danni Wang Yan Yin Yi Deng Mengling Ye Ping Wei Zhuo Zhang Chun Chen Shengfang Qin Xueyan Wang Assessment of Combined Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis: A Cohort Study of 3710 Pregnancies Genetics Research |
title | Assessment of Combined Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis: A Cohort Study of 3710 Pregnancies |
title_full | Assessment of Combined Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis: A Cohort Study of 3710 Pregnancies |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Combined Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis: A Cohort Study of 3710 Pregnancies |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Combined Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis: A Cohort Study of 3710 Pregnancies |
title_short | Assessment of Combined Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis: A Cohort Study of 3710 Pregnancies |
title_sort | assessment of combined karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis a cohort study of 3710 pregnancies |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/6791439 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jinwang assessmentofcombinedkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayanalysisinprenataldiagnosisacohortstudyof3710pregnancies AT danniwang assessmentofcombinedkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayanalysisinprenataldiagnosisacohortstudyof3710pregnancies AT yanyin assessmentofcombinedkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayanalysisinprenataldiagnosisacohortstudyof3710pregnancies AT yideng assessmentofcombinedkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayanalysisinprenataldiagnosisacohortstudyof3710pregnancies AT menglingye assessmentofcombinedkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayanalysisinprenataldiagnosisacohortstudyof3710pregnancies AT pingwei assessmentofcombinedkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayanalysisinprenataldiagnosisacohortstudyof3710pregnancies AT zhuozhang assessmentofcombinedkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayanalysisinprenataldiagnosisacohortstudyof3710pregnancies AT chunchen assessmentofcombinedkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayanalysisinprenataldiagnosisacohortstudyof3710pregnancies AT shengfangqin assessmentofcombinedkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayanalysisinprenataldiagnosisacohortstudyof3710pregnancies AT xueyanwang assessmentofcombinedkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayanalysisinprenataldiagnosisacohortstudyof3710pregnancies |