Six-year performance of risk-based selection for lung cancer screening in the Manchester Lung Health Check cohort

Objective Risk prediction models are used to determine eligibility for targeted lung cancer screening. However, prospective data regarding model performance in this setting are limited. Here we report the performance of the PLCOm2012 risk model, which calculates 6 year lung cancer risk, in a cohort...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew Sperrin, Haval Balata, Richard Booton, Hilary A Robbins, Philip A J Crosbie, Patrick Goodley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2024-07-01
Series:BMJ Oncology
Online Access:https://bmjoncology.bmj.com/content/3/1/e000560.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832581905768251392
author Matthew Sperrin
Haval Balata
Richard Booton
Hilary A Robbins
Philip A J Crosbie
Patrick Goodley
author_facet Matthew Sperrin
Haval Balata
Richard Booton
Hilary A Robbins
Philip A J Crosbie
Patrick Goodley
author_sort Matthew Sperrin
collection DOAJ
description Objective Risk prediction models are used to determine eligibility for targeted lung cancer screening. However, prospective data regarding model performance in this setting are limited. Here we report the performance of the PLCOm2012 risk model, which calculates 6 year lung cancer risk, in a cohort invited for lung cancer screening in a socioeconomically deprived area.Methods and analysis Calibration (expected/observed (E/O) lung cancer diagnoses over 6 years) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of PLCOm2012 and other models was performed in Manchester Lung Health Check (M-LHC) participants, where PLCOm2012 ≥1.51% was used prospectively to determine screening eligibility. Lung cancers diagnosed by any route were captured within 6 years of risk assessment, for both screened and non-screened participants. Performance of a range of models was evaluated.Results Out of 2541 attendees, 56% were high-risk (n=1430/2541) and offered screening; 44% were low-risk (n=1111/2541) and not screened. Over 6 years, 7.3% (n=105/1430) and 0.9% (n=10/1111) were diagnosed with lung cancer in the high and low-risk cohorts, respectively (p<0.0001). Risk was underestimated in both high-risk, screened (E/O 0.68 (0.57–0.82)) and low-risk, unscreened groups (E/O 0.61 (0.33–1.14)). Most other models also underestimated risk.Conclusion Risk-based eligibility using PLCOm2012 successfully classified most eventual lung cancer cases in the high-risk, screened group. Prediction models generally underestimated risk in this socioeconomically deprived cohort, irrespective of screening status. The effect of screening on increasing the probability of lung cancer diagnosis should be considered when interpreting measures of prediction model performance.
format Article
id doaj-art-864497fd9b0540b2815f6a83785ca965
institution Kabale University
issn 2752-7948
language English
publishDate 2024-07-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Oncology
spelling doaj-art-864497fd9b0540b2815f6a83785ca9652025-01-30T08:40:12ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Oncology2752-79482024-07-013110.1136/bmjonc-2024-000560Six-year performance of risk-based selection for lung cancer screening in the Manchester Lung Health Check cohortMatthew Sperrin0Haval Balata1Richard Booton2Hilary A Robbins3Philip A J Crosbie4Patrick Goodley5Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UKDivision of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UKDivision of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UKInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, FranceDivision of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UKDivision of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UKObjective Risk prediction models are used to determine eligibility for targeted lung cancer screening. However, prospective data regarding model performance in this setting are limited. Here we report the performance of the PLCOm2012 risk model, which calculates 6 year lung cancer risk, in a cohort invited for lung cancer screening in a socioeconomically deprived area.Methods and analysis Calibration (expected/observed (E/O) lung cancer diagnoses over 6 years) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of PLCOm2012 and other models was performed in Manchester Lung Health Check (M-LHC) participants, where PLCOm2012 ≥1.51% was used prospectively to determine screening eligibility. Lung cancers diagnosed by any route were captured within 6 years of risk assessment, for both screened and non-screened participants. Performance of a range of models was evaluated.Results Out of 2541 attendees, 56% were high-risk (n=1430/2541) and offered screening; 44% were low-risk (n=1111/2541) and not screened. Over 6 years, 7.3% (n=105/1430) and 0.9% (n=10/1111) were diagnosed with lung cancer in the high and low-risk cohorts, respectively (p<0.0001). Risk was underestimated in both high-risk, screened (E/O 0.68 (0.57–0.82)) and low-risk, unscreened groups (E/O 0.61 (0.33–1.14)). Most other models also underestimated risk.Conclusion Risk-based eligibility using PLCOm2012 successfully classified most eventual lung cancer cases in the high-risk, screened group. Prediction models generally underestimated risk in this socioeconomically deprived cohort, irrespective of screening status. The effect of screening on increasing the probability of lung cancer diagnosis should be considered when interpreting measures of prediction model performance.https://bmjoncology.bmj.com/content/3/1/e000560.full
spellingShingle Matthew Sperrin
Haval Balata
Richard Booton
Hilary A Robbins
Philip A J Crosbie
Patrick Goodley
Six-year performance of risk-based selection for lung cancer screening in the Manchester Lung Health Check cohort
BMJ Oncology
title Six-year performance of risk-based selection for lung cancer screening in the Manchester Lung Health Check cohort
title_full Six-year performance of risk-based selection for lung cancer screening in the Manchester Lung Health Check cohort
title_fullStr Six-year performance of risk-based selection for lung cancer screening in the Manchester Lung Health Check cohort
title_full_unstemmed Six-year performance of risk-based selection for lung cancer screening in the Manchester Lung Health Check cohort
title_short Six-year performance of risk-based selection for lung cancer screening in the Manchester Lung Health Check cohort
title_sort six year performance of risk based selection for lung cancer screening in the manchester lung health check cohort
url https://bmjoncology.bmj.com/content/3/1/e000560.full
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewsperrin sixyearperformanceofriskbasedselectionforlungcancerscreeninginthemanchesterlunghealthcheckcohort
AT havalbalata sixyearperformanceofriskbasedselectionforlungcancerscreeninginthemanchesterlunghealthcheckcohort
AT richardbooton sixyearperformanceofriskbasedselectionforlungcancerscreeninginthemanchesterlunghealthcheckcohort
AT hilaryarobbins sixyearperformanceofriskbasedselectionforlungcancerscreeninginthemanchesterlunghealthcheckcohort
AT philipajcrosbie sixyearperformanceofriskbasedselectionforlungcancerscreeninginthemanchesterlunghealthcheckcohort
AT patrickgoodley sixyearperformanceofriskbasedselectionforlungcancerscreeninginthemanchesterlunghealthcheckcohort