THE BODY OF «GENERAL AI» AS AN ONTO-SOCIAL VERIFIER
The purpose of the article: to clarify the role of the body used by the AGI as a verifier of its cognitive activity. It is shown that the concept of «embodied mind» potentially removes the basic contradiction of general AI: cognitive activity cannot be fully reflected, and the technogenic nature of...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Oles Honchar Dnipro National University
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Епістемологічні дослідження у філософії, соціальних і політичних науках |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://visnukpfs.dp.ua/index.php/PFS/article/view/1198 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The purpose of the article: to clarify the role of the body used by the AGI as a verifier of its cognitive activity.
It is shown that the concept of «embodied mind» potentially removes the basic contradiction of general AI: cognitive activity cannot be fully reflected, and the technogenic nature of AI requires the maximization of self-reflection. The body for general AI can be a tool for overcoming the limitations of Gödel’s incompleteness theorem.
A contradiction is described: between the need for the widest possible use of publicly available “digital twins”, collective knowledge of the world and the need for general AI to have an ontological verifier as the basis for its own subjectivity. A form of manifestation of this contradiction can be considered as restriction of access to the results of research conducted by AI: secrecy reduces the capabilities of general AI as a subject, but increases its independence as an individual;
It has been proven that the body of general AI cannot be a sufficient ontological verifier; cooperation with other subjects and the use of sensors external to its body are necessary;
It has been shown that while maintaining the rate of development of communications, the body of general AI, as an individual, can be considered as part of the technosphere, which it controls better than all other AI. The independence of general AI, as an individual, is ensured by using the body as a verifier of social interactions. And the body of general AI, as a subject, is that part of the technosphere which it sets goals and correlates with reality better than other subjects;
The dynamic nature of the corporeality of general AI has been established: in the context of the rapid development of artificial intelligence capabilities, it is necessary to constantly improve your body and deepen its reflection for use as a verifier in both senses;
It has been established that the body of general AI, upon achieving a balance of ontological and social verification, can be an instrument for removing the contradiction between AI, as an individual, and AI, as a subject.
However, the problem of the relationship between the concepts of “verifier of social interactions” and “social body” remains unanalyzed.
|
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2618-1274 2618-1282 |