Effect of different prophylactical doses of ondansetron for the hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cesarean section: a randomized controlled study

Background5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists have been reported to reduce post-spinal anesthesia hypotension, though their efficacy remains controversial. We investigated the effect of prophylactic ondansetron on hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cesarean section following...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rui Qin, Xiangzhao Xu, Na Zhao, Yongqiang Shi, Yi Chen, Jinhua Chen, Xinli Ni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1495721/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850262230414655488
author Rui Qin
Xiangzhao Xu
Na Zhao
Yongqiang Shi
Yi Chen
Jinhua Chen
Xinli Ni
author_facet Rui Qin
Xiangzhao Xu
Na Zhao
Yongqiang Shi
Yi Chen
Jinhua Chen
Xinli Ni
author_sort Rui Qin
collection DOAJ
description Background5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists have been reported to reduce post-spinal anesthesia hypotension, though their efficacy remains controversial. We investigated the effect of prophylactic ondansetron on hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cesarean section following spinal anesthesia.MethodsPatients scheduled for elective cesarean section (n = 120) were randomly allocated to three groups (NS group, 4 mg group, 8 mg group) of 40: those given 4 mL of normal saline (NS), and those given either 4 mg or 8 mg ondansetron (4 mL) before spinal anesthesia. Patient information, maternal systolic blood pressure stability [median performance error (MDPE), median absolute performance error (MDAPE)], the incidence of post-spinal anesthesia hypotension, norepinephrine doses, other adverse events (severe post-spinal anesthesia hypotension, nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, and hypertension), umbilical artery blood gas values, and infant Apgar scores were all recorded.ResultsThe primary outcomes (median performance error, MDPE and median absolute performance error, MDAPE) were significantly different among the three groups. (p = 0.001, p = 0.002). Compared with the NS group, systolic blood pressure (SBP) was maintained closer to baseline in the 4 mg group (p = 0.003, p = 0.006), as was the 8 mg group (p = 0.011, p = 0.006). There was a significant difference in the incidence of post-spinal anesthesia hypotension among the three groups (p = 0.002). However, only there was a statistical difference between NS and the 8 mg groups in pairwise comparisons (p = 0.001). The doses of norepinephrine, the incidences of other adverse events, umbilical artery blood gas, and Apgar scores were not statistically different between the three groups.ConclusionProphylactic 4 mg or 8 mg ondansetron improved hemodynamic stability after spinal anesthesia in cesarean section; however, only 8 mg reduced post-spinal anesthesia hypotension.Clinical trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT05475873.
format Article
id doaj-art-854468d09b72403e9db5ffce8d00a1c6
institution OA Journals
issn 2296-858X
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Medicine
spelling doaj-art-854468d09b72403e9db5ffce8d00a1c62025-08-20T01:55:12ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Medicine2296-858X2025-04-011210.3389/fmed.2025.14957211495721Effect of different prophylactical doses of ondansetron for the hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cesarean section: a randomized controlled studyRui Qin0Xiangzhao Xu1Na Zhao2Yongqiang Shi3Yi Chen4Jinhua Chen5Xinli Ni6Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesiology, The People’s Hospital of Nanchuan, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, ChinaDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, ChinaBackground5-hydroxytryptamine 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists have been reported to reduce post-spinal anesthesia hypotension, though their efficacy remains controversial. We investigated the effect of prophylactic ondansetron on hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cesarean section following spinal anesthesia.MethodsPatients scheduled for elective cesarean section (n = 120) were randomly allocated to three groups (NS group, 4 mg group, 8 mg group) of 40: those given 4 mL of normal saline (NS), and those given either 4 mg or 8 mg ondansetron (4 mL) before spinal anesthesia. Patient information, maternal systolic blood pressure stability [median performance error (MDPE), median absolute performance error (MDAPE)], the incidence of post-spinal anesthesia hypotension, norepinephrine doses, other adverse events (severe post-spinal anesthesia hypotension, nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, and hypertension), umbilical artery blood gas values, and infant Apgar scores were all recorded.ResultsThe primary outcomes (median performance error, MDPE and median absolute performance error, MDAPE) were significantly different among the three groups. (p = 0.001, p = 0.002). Compared with the NS group, systolic blood pressure (SBP) was maintained closer to baseline in the 4 mg group (p = 0.003, p = 0.006), as was the 8 mg group (p = 0.011, p = 0.006). There was a significant difference in the incidence of post-spinal anesthesia hypotension among the three groups (p = 0.002). However, only there was a statistical difference between NS and the 8 mg groups in pairwise comparisons (p = 0.001). The doses of norepinephrine, the incidences of other adverse events, umbilical artery blood gas, and Apgar scores were not statistically different between the three groups.ConclusionProphylactic 4 mg or 8 mg ondansetron improved hemodynamic stability after spinal anesthesia in cesarean section; however, only 8 mg reduced post-spinal anesthesia hypotension.Clinical trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT05475873.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1495721/fullondansetronprophylactichemodynamic stabilitycesarean sectionspinal anesthesia
spellingShingle Rui Qin
Xiangzhao Xu
Na Zhao
Yongqiang Shi
Yi Chen
Jinhua Chen
Xinli Ni
Effect of different prophylactical doses of ondansetron for the hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cesarean section: a randomized controlled study
Frontiers in Medicine
ondansetron
prophylactic
hemodynamic stability
cesarean section
spinal anesthesia
title Effect of different prophylactical doses of ondansetron for the hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cesarean section: a randomized controlled study
title_full Effect of different prophylactical doses of ondansetron for the hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cesarean section: a randomized controlled study
title_fullStr Effect of different prophylactical doses of ondansetron for the hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cesarean section: a randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different prophylactical doses of ondansetron for the hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cesarean section: a randomized controlled study
title_short Effect of different prophylactical doses of ondansetron for the hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cesarean section: a randomized controlled study
title_sort effect of different prophylactical doses of ondansetron for the hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing cesarean section a randomized controlled study
topic ondansetron
prophylactic
hemodynamic stability
cesarean section
spinal anesthesia
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1495721/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ruiqin effectofdifferentprophylacticaldosesofondansetronforthehemodynamicstabilityinpatientsundergoingcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT xiangzhaoxu effectofdifferentprophylacticaldosesofondansetronforthehemodynamicstabilityinpatientsundergoingcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT nazhao effectofdifferentprophylacticaldosesofondansetronforthehemodynamicstabilityinpatientsundergoingcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT yongqiangshi effectofdifferentprophylacticaldosesofondansetronforthehemodynamicstabilityinpatientsundergoingcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT yichen effectofdifferentprophylacticaldosesofondansetronforthehemodynamicstabilityinpatientsundergoingcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT jinhuachen effectofdifferentprophylacticaldosesofondansetronforthehemodynamicstabilityinpatientsundergoingcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT xinlini effectofdifferentprophylacticaldosesofondansetronforthehemodynamicstabilityinpatientsundergoingcesareansectionarandomizedcontrolledstudy