Individual differences in training time in the rat gambling task are unrelated to subsequent decision-making strategies

IntroductionDecision-making requires individuals to perceive probabilities and risks associated with different options. The Iowa gambling task (IGT) is a widely used instrument that assesses decision-making under uncertainty and risk by varying monetary reinforcer/loss contingencies. The rat gamblin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frida A. Lindberg, Christakis Kagios, Nikita Tjernström, Erika Roman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1490196/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585004052381696
author Frida A. Lindberg
Christakis Kagios
Christakis Kagios
Nikita Tjernström
Erika Roman
Erika Roman
author_facet Frida A. Lindberg
Christakis Kagios
Christakis Kagios
Nikita Tjernström
Erika Roman
Erika Roman
author_sort Frida A. Lindberg
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionDecision-making requires individuals to perceive probabilities and risks associated with different options. The Iowa gambling task (IGT) is a widely used instrument that assesses decision-making under uncertainty and risk by varying monetary reinforcer/loss contingencies. The rat gambling task (rGT), based on the IGT, is a preclinical test using varying number of palatable reinforcers as wins and different duration of timeouts as punishment, mimicking losses. The rGT requires extensive operant training prior to the free choice sessions. The aim of the present study was to investigate if task acquisition and number of training days affected subsequent individual differences in decision-making strategies in the rGT, and if behavioral profiles impacted on task learning.MethodTraining time and performance of 70 male Lister Hooded rats from previously published studies were herein used to investigate whether learning time affected later decision-making strategies in the free choice rGT. Behavioral profiles generated from a subset of animals were used to study the impact of underlying behavior on learning time.ResultsThere were differences in training days between fast, intermediate and slow learners. However, time required to acquire the rGT did not affect subsequent decision-making strategies in the free choice rGT. Finally, learning time was independent of underlying behavioral profiles.DiscussionIn conclusion, neither decision-making strategies in the rGT nor behavioral profiles were correlated or differed between animals with different learning speed. This suggests that the large variation in training time between animals is unrelated to subsequent decision-making strategies during free choice rGT. Such information is valuable for researchers using the rGT.
format Article
id doaj-art-84ea5bc9e5cc4bc1aa883bbc4082f7c0
institution Kabale University
issn 1664-0640
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj-art-84ea5bc9e5cc4bc1aa883bbc4082f7c02025-01-27T06:40:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402025-01-011610.3389/fpsyt.2025.14901961490196Individual differences in training time in the rat gambling task are unrelated to subsequent decision-making strategiesFrida A. Lindberg0Christakis Kagios1Christakis Kagios2Nikita Tjernström3Erika Roman4Erika Roman5Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, SwedenDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, SwedenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenIntroductionDecision-making requires individuals to perceive probabilities and risks associated with different options. The Iowa gambling task (IGT) is a widely used instrument that assesses decision-making under uncertainty and risk by varying monetary reinforcer/loss contingencies. The rat gambling task (rGT), based on the IGT, is a preclinical test using varying number of palatable reinforcers as wins and different duration of timeouts as punishment, mimicking losses. The rGT requires extensive operant training prior to the free choice sessions. The aim of the present study was to investigate if task acquisition and number of training days affected subsequent individual differences in decision-making strategies in the rGT, and if behavioral profiles impacted on task learning.MethodTraining time and performance of 70 male Lister Hooded rats from previously published studies were herein used to investigate whether learning time affected later decision-making strategies in the free choice rGT. Behavioral profiles generated from a subset of animals were used to study the impact of underlying behavior on learning time.ResultsThere were differences in training days between fast, intermediate and slow learners. However, time required to acquire the rGT did not affect subsequent decision-making strategies in the free choice rGT. Finally, learning time was independent of underlying behavioral profiles.DiscussionIn conclusion, neither decision-making strategies in the rGT nor behavioral profiles were correlated or differed between animals with different learning speed. This suggests that the large variation in training time between animals is unrelated to subsequent decision-making strategies during free choice rGT. Such information is valuable for researchers using the rGT.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1490196/fullbehavioral profileimpulsivityIowa Gambling Tasklearning speedmultivariate concentric square fieldpersonality
spellingShingle Frida A. Lindberg
Christakis Kagios
Christakis Kagios
Nikita Tjernström
Erika Roman
Erika Roman
Individual differences in training time in the rat gambling task are unrelated to subsequent decision-making strategies
Frontiers in Psychiatry
behavioral profile
impulsivity
Iowa Gambling Task
learning speed
multivariate concentric square field
personality
title Individual differences in training time in the rat gambling task are unrelated to subsequent decision-making strategies
title_full Individual differences in training time in the rat gambling task are unrelated to subsequent decision-making strategies
title_fullStr Individual differences in training time in the rat gambling task are unrelated to subsequent decision-making strategies
title_full_unstemmed Individual differences in training time in the rat gambling task are unrelated to subsequent decision-making strategies
title_short Individual differences in training time in the rat gambling task are unrelated to subsequent decision-making strategies
title_sort individual differences in training time in the rat gambling task are unrelated to subsequent decision making strategies
topic behavioral profile
impulsivity
Iowa Gambling Task
learning speed
multivariate concentric square field
personality
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1490196/full
work_keys_str_mv AT fridaalindberg individualdifferencesintrainingtimeintheratgamblingtaskareunrelatedtosubsequentdecisionmakingstrategies
AT christakiskagios individualdifferencesintrainingtimeintheratgamblingtaskareunrelatedtosubsequentdecisionmakingstrategies
AT christakiskagios individualdifferencesintrainingtimeintheratgamblingtaskareunrelatedtosubsequentdecisionmakingstrategies
AT nikitatjernstrom individualdifferencesintrainingtimeintheratgamblingtaskareunrelatedtosubsequentdecisionmakingstrategies
AT erikaroman individualdifferencesintrainingtimeintheratgamblingtaskareunrelatedtosubsequentdecisionmakingstrategies
AT erikaroman individualdifferencesintrainingtimeintheratgamblingtaskareunrelatedtosubsequentdecisionmakingstrategies