Kinematic and Radiographic Evaluation of Acromioclavicular Reconstruction with a Synthetic Ligament

Purpose. The optimal surgical technique for unstable acromioclavicular (AC) and coracoclavicular (CC) joint injuries has not yet been established. The biomechanical and radiographic effect of the LockDown device, a synthetic ligament for AC joint reconstruction, was evaluated to assess the optimal s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafael F. Escamilla, Chad Poage, Scott Brotherton, Toran D. MacLeod, Charles Leddon, James R. Andrews
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Advances in Orthopedics
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7144209
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832565725268541440
author Rafael F. Escamilla
Chad Poage
Scott Brotherton
Toran D. MacLeod
Charles Leddon
James R. Andrews
author_facet Rafael F. Escamilla
Chad Poage
Scott Brotherton
Toran D. MacLeod
Charles Leddon
James R. Andrews
author_sort Rafael F. Escamilla
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. The optimal surgical technique for unstable acromioclavicular (AC) and coracoclavicular (CC) joint injuries has not yet been established. The biomechanical and radiographic effect of the LockDown device, a synthetic ligament for AC joint reconstruction, was evaluated to assess the optimal surgical technique for unstable AC and CC joint injuries. It was hypothesized that the LockDown device would restore AC joint kinematics and radiographic stability to near native values. Methods. Three fresh frozen cadaveric torsos (6 shoulders) modelled CC joint motion in their “native,” “severed,” and “reconstructed” states. The effects of stressed and unstressed native, severed, and reconstructed conditions on AC separation and CC distances in anteroposterior, mediolateral, and inferosuperior directions during shoulder abduction, flexion, and scaption were assessed. The analysis of variance (p, 0.05) was used to compare CC distance and peak AC distance in anteroposterior, mediolateral, and inferosuperior directions during shoulder flexion, abduction, and scaption measurements among native, severed, and reconstructed states with unstressed and stressed Zanca radiographic views. Results. From radiographic analyses, the CC distance was significantly greater (p=0.001) across the surgical state in stressed versus unstressed views. Mean difference between stressed and unstressed views was 1.8 mm in native state, 4.1 mm in severed state, and 0.9 mm in reconstructed state. The CC distance was significantly greater in the “severed” state (10.4 mm unstressed; 14.5 mm stressed) compared to the “native” state (p=0.016) (6.5 mm unstressed; 8.3 mm stressed) and compared to the “reconstructed” state (p=0.005) (3.1 mm unstressed; 4.0 mm stressed) and significantly less (p=0.008) in the “reconstructed” state compared to the “native” state. CC distances decreased from native to reconstructed, an average of 3.3 mm for unstressed and 4.3 mm for stressed. On average, peak AC joint separation distance in anteroposterior, mediolateral, and inferosuperior directions during shoulder-abduction, flexion, and scaption was shown to be restored to 11.5 mm of native values after reconstruction with LockDown device. Conclusion. Reconstruction of AC joint with LockDown synthetic ligament restores motion of clavicle and acromion to near native values, thereby decreasing scapular dyskinesis and enhancing AC joint stability.
format Article
id doaj-art-84e327eb8df042c5934266ec6f9ea291
institution Kabale University
issn 2090-3472
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Orthopedics
spelling doaj-art-84e327eb8df042c5934266ec6f9ea2912025-02-03T01:06:49ZengWileyAdvances in Orthopedics2090-34722022-01-01202210.1155/2022/7144209Kinematic and Radiographic Evaluation of Acromioclavicular Reconstruction with a Synthetic LigamentRafael F. Escamilla0Chad Poage1Scott Brotherton2Toran D. MacLeod3Charles Leddon4James R. Andrews5Department of Physical TherapyAndrews Institute for Orthopaedics & Sports MedicineOrthopedic Surgery & Sports MedicineDepartment of Physical TherapyAndrews Research and Education FoundationAndrews Research and Education FoundationPurpose. The optimal surgical technique for unstable acromioclavicular (AC) and coracoclavicular (CC) joint injuries has not yet been established. The biomechanical and radiographic effect of the LockDown device, a synthetic ligament for AC joint reconstruction, was evaluated to assess the optimal surgical technique for unstable AC and CC joint injuries. It was hypothesized that the LockDown device would restore AC joint kinematics and radiographic stability to near native values. Methods. Three fresh frozen cadaveric torsos (6 shoulders) modelled CC joint motion in their “native,” “severed,” and “reconstructed” states. The effects of stressed and unstressed native, severed, and reconstructed conditions on AC separation and CC distances in anteroposterior, mediolateral, and inferosuperior directions during shoulder abduction, flexion, and scaption were assessed. The analysis of variance (p, 0.05) was used to compare CC distance and peak AC distance in anteroposterior, mediolateral, and inferosuperior directions during shoulder flexion, abduction, and scaption measurements among native, severed, and reconstructed states with unstressed and stressed Zanca radiographic views. Results. From radiographic analyses, the CC distance was significantly greater (p=0.001) across the surgical state in stressed versus unstressed views. Mean difference between stressed and unstressed views was 1.8 mm in native state, 4.1 mm in severed state, and 0.9 mm in reconstructed state. The CC distance was significantly greater in the “severed” state (10.4 mm unstressed; 14.5 mm stressed) compared to the “native” state (p=0.016) (6.5 mm unstressed; 8.3 mm stressed) and compared to the “reconstructed” state (p=0.005) (3.1 mm unstressed; 4.0 mm stressed) and significantly less (p=0.008) in the “reconstructed” state compared to the “native” state. CC distances decreased from native to reconstructed, an average of 3.3 mm for unstressed and 4.3 mm for stressed. On average, peak AC joint separation distance in anteroposterior, mediolateral, and inferosuperior directions during shoulder-abduction, flexion, and scaption was shown to be restored to 11.5 mm of native values after reconstruction with LockDown device. Conclusion. Reconstruction of AC joint with LockDown synthetic ligament restores motion of clavicle and acromion to near native values, thereby decreasing scapular dyskinesis and enhancing AC joint stability.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7144209
spellingShingle Rafael F. Escamilla
Chad Poage
Scott Brotherton
Toran D. MacLeod
Charles Leddon
James R. Andrews
Kinematic and Radiographic Evaluation of Acromioclavicular Reconstruction with a Synthetic Ligament
Advances in Orthopedics
title Kinematic and Radiographic Evaluation of Acromioclavicular Reconstruction with a Synthetic Ligament
title_full Kinematic and Radiographic Evaluation of Acromioclavicular Reconstruction with a Synthetic Ligament
title_fullStr Kinematic and Radiographic Evaluation of Acromioclavicular Reconstruction with a Synthetic Ligament
title_full_unstemmed Kinematic and Radiographic Evaluation of Acromioclavicular Reconstruction with a Synthetic Ligament
title_short Kinematic and Radiographic Evaluation of Acromioclavicular Reconstruction with a Synthetic Ligament
title_sort kinematic and radiographic evaluation of acromioclavicular reconstruction with a synthetic ligament
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7144209
work_keys_str_mv AT rafaelfescamilla kinematicandradiographicevaluationofacromioclavicularreconstructionwithasyntheticligament
AT chadpoage kinematicandradiographicevaluationofacromioclavicularreconstructionwithasyntheticligament
AT scottbrotherton kinematicandradiographicevaluationofacromioclavicularreconstructionwithasyntheticligament
AT torandmacleod kinematicandradiographicevaluationofacromioclavicularreconstructionwithasyntheticligament
AT charlesleddon kinematicandradiographicevaluationofacromioclavicularreconstructionwithasyntheticligament
AT jamesrandrews kinematicandradiographicevaluationofacromioclavicularreconstructionwithasyntheticligament