Estimation of Surface Area and Volume of a Nematode from Morphometric Data
Nematode volume and surface area are usually based on the inappropriate assumption that the animal is cylindrical. While nematodes are approximately circular in cross section, the radius varies longitudinally. We use standard morphometric data to obtain improved estimates of volume and surface area...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Scientifica |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6767538 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832564209766891520 |
---|---|
author | Simon Brown Kevin C. Pedley David C. Simcock |
author_facet | Simon Brown Kevin C. Pedley David C. Simcock |
author_sort | Simon Brown |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Nematode volume and surface area are usually based on the inappropriate assumption that the animal is cylindrical. While nematodes are approximately circular in cross section, the radius varies longitudinally. We use standard morphometric data to obtain improved estimates of volume and surface area based on (i) a geometrical approach and (ii) a Bézier representation of the nematode. These new estimators require only the morphometric data available from Cobb’s ratios, but if fewer coordinates are available the geometric approach reduces to the standard estimates. Consequently, these new estimators are better than the standard alternatives. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-8451da2bbcb2415ab4c30d8230cf5849 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2090-908X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Scientifica |
spelling | doaj-art-8451da2bbcb2415ab4c30d8230cf58492025-02-03T01:11:35ZengWileyScientifica2090-908X2016-01-01201610.1155/2016/67675386767538Estimation of Surface Area and Volume of a Nematode from Morphometric DataSimon Brown0Kevin C. Pedley1David C. Simcock2Deviot Institute, Deviot, TAS 7275, AustraliaInstitute of Food, Nutrition and Human Health, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New ZealandDeviot Institute, Deviot, TAS 7275, AustraliaNematode volume and surface area are usually based on the inappropriate assumption that the animal is cylindrical. While nematodes are approximately circular in cross section, the radius varies longitudinally. We use standard morphometric data to obtain improved estimates of volume and surface area based on (i) a geometrical approach and (ii) a Bézier representation of the nematode. These new estimators require only the morphometric data available from Cobb’s ratios, but if fewer coordinates are available the geometric approach reduces to the standard estimates. Consequently, these new estimators are better than the standard alternatives.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6767538 |
spellingShingle | Simon Brown Kevin C. Pedley David C. Simcock Estimation of Surface Area and Volume of a Nematode from Morphometric Data Scientifica |
title | Estimation of Surface Area and Volume of a Nematode from Morphometric Data |
title_full | Estimation of Surface Area and Volume of a Nematode from Morphometric Data |
title_fullStr | Estimation of Surface Area and Volume of a Nematode from Morphometric Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimation of Surface Area and Volume of a Nematode from Morphometric Data |
title_short | Estimation of Surface Area and Volume of a Nematode from Morphometric Data |
title_sort | estimation of surface area and volume of a nematode from morphometric data |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6767538 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simonbrown estimationofsurfaceareaandvolumeofanematodefrommorphometricdata AT kevincpedley estimationofsurfaceareaandvolumeofanematodefrommorphometricdata AT davidcsimcock estimationofsurfaceareaandvolumeofanematodefrommorphometricdata |