Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Cystic Fibrosis: Antibiotic Therapy and the Science behind the Magic

Respiratory failure secondary to chronic bronchiectasis is the cause of death in more than 90% of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The predominant microbes involved in CF lung disease are unusual: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Burkolderia cepacia. While antimicrobial therapy h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Noni E MacDonald
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 1997-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/617690
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832565109272084480
author Noni E MacDonald
author_facet Noni E MacDonald
author_sort Noni E MacDonald
collection DOAJ
description Respiratory failure secondary to chronic bronchiectasis is the cause of death in more than 90% of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The predominant microbes involved in CF lung disease are unusual: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Burkolderia cepacia. While antimicrobial therapy has been a component of CF care programs for decades, randomized controlled studies in the 1980s and early 1990s failed to show consistent measurable benefit. Research that stemmed from the discovery of the CF gene has shed new light on the inter-relationship of these microbes and the respiratory epithelial lung changes secondary to the CF gene. Five mechanisms have been proposed to explain the increased P aeruginosa colonization of the lower airway in CF. Recent research has also shown that antimicrobial therapy in CF may be effective not through eradication of the organism but by decreasing bacterial density and exoproduct production in the lung and thus decreasing inflammatory stimulus; by protecting against the consequences of an overexhuberant host response and in patients with stop mutations, potentially by correcting the gene defect. This tale of misunderstanding of the role and value of antimicrobial therapy in CF care illustrates the importance of ensuring close communiation between clinicians and researchers. The randomized controlled studies of the 1980s were not designed to answer the ‘right’ questions. The clinicians’ observations that the CF patients did improve with antimicrobial therapy have been validated by recent studies using different endpoints.
format Article
id doaj-art-83ece6b764004178ba0557242ca3ec2a
institution Kabale University
issn 1180-2332
language English
publishDate 1997-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
spelling doaj-art-83ece6b764004178ba0557242ca3ec2a2025-02-03T01:09:26ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Infectious Diseases1180-23321997-01-018633534210.1155/1997/617690Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Cystic Fibrosis: Antibiotic Therapy and the Science behind the MagicNoni E MacDonald0Paediatrics, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa, and Division of Infectious Disease, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, CanadaRespiratory failure secondary to chronic bronchiectasis is the cause of death in more than 90% of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The predominant microbes involved in CF lung disease are unusual: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Burkolderia cepacia. While antimicrobial therapy has been a component of CF care programs for decades, randomized controlled studies in the 1980s and early 1990s failed to show consistent measurable benefit. Research that stemmed from the discovery of the CF gene has shed new light on the inter-relationship of these microbes and the respiratory epithelial lung changes secondary to the CF gene. Five mechanisms have been proposed to explain the increased P aeruginosa colonization of the lower airway in CF. Recent research has also shown that antimicrobial therapy in CF may be effective not through eradication of the organism but by decreasing bacterial density and exoproduct production in the lung and thus decreasing inflammatory stimulus; by protecting against the consequences of an overexhuberant host response and in patients with stop mutations, potentially by correcting the gene defect. This tale of misunderstanding of the role and value of antimicrobial therapy in CF care illustrates the importance of ensuring close communiation between clinicians and researchers. The randomized controlled studies of the 1980s were not designed to answer the ‘right’ questions. The clinicians’ observations that the CF patients did improve with antimicrobial therapy have been validated by recent studies using different endpoints.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/617690
spellingShingle Noni E MacDonald
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Cystic Fibrosis: Antibiotic Therapy and the Science behind the Magic
Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases
title Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Cystic Fibrosis: Antibiotic Therapy and the Science behind the Magic
title_full Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Cystic Fibrosis: Antibiotic Therapy and the Science behind the Magic
title_fullStr Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Cystic Fibrosis: Antibiotic Therapy and the Science behind the Magic
title_full_unstemmed Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Cystic Fibrosis: Antibiotic Therapy and the Science behind the Magic
title_short Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Cystic Fibrosis: Antibiotic Therapy and the Science behind the Magic
title_sort pseudomonas aeruginosa and cystic fibrosis antibiotic therapy and the science behind the magic
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1997/617690
work_keys_str_mv AT noniemacdonald pseudomonasaeruginosaandcysticfibrosisantibiotictherapyandthesciencebehindthemagic