Les humanistes français, le roi et le tyran. Débats autour du tyrannicide au sein du milieu humaniste français, 1ère moitié du XVe siècle

On November 23, 1407, the premeditated murder of king Charles’ brother Louis d’Orléans by the henchmen of their cousin John of Burgundy puts the question of the tyrant and tyrannicide at the center of intellectual debates. Indeed, having confessed to ordering the crime, Jean sans Peur goes back on h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lucie Jollivet
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Instituto de Estudos Medievais 2018-01-01
Series:Medievalista
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/medievalista/1641
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832580480905510912
author Lucie Jollivet
author_facet Lucie Jollivet
author_sort Lucie Jollivet
collection DOAJ
description On November 23, 1407, the premeditated murder of king Charles’ brother Louis d’Orléans by the henchmen of their cousin John of Burgundy puts the question of the tyrant and tyrannicide at the center of intellectual debates. Indeed, having confessed to ordering the crime, Jean sans Peur goes back on his statement and asks a team of theologians led by the Norman Jean Petit to prepare his defense. This justification is exposed to the public in 1408 and is based upon an argument taken to the jurist Cassius: vim vi repellere licet. Louis was a would-be tyrant, so his murder was both lawful and good. This assertion seems to be an echo of the debates surrounding tyranicide raging amoung the Italian humanists for half a century. Due to the refusal of confession, the royal justice is paralized; therefore the Justification by Jean Petit is all the more shocking. Faced with the inability of justice, Louis’ family is left with no choice but vengeance. The French humanists milieu, which brings together acknowledged and famous humanists such as Nicolas de Clamanges, Laurent de Premierfait and Alain Chartier, and academics tempted by this new intellectual movement, such as Pierre d’Ailly and Jean Gerson, revive the controversy by adapting it to the context: who can be call a tyrant? What is the difference between a tyrant and a legitimate king? Is it lawfull to kill the tyrant as to save the king? The most appropriate answer to these questions must be found because what is at stake is no less than the French kingdom survival.
format Article
id doaj-art-83ddb13ac35c41e690ed78ed8234b3b4
institution Kabale University
issn 1646-740X
language deu
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Instituto de Estudos Medievais
record_format Article
series Medievalista
spelling doaj-art-83ddb13ac35c41e690ed78ed8234b3b42025-01-30T10:53:30ZdeuInstituto de Estudos MedievaisMedievalista1646-740X2018-01-012310.4000/medievalista.1641Les humanistes français, le roi et le tyran. Débats autour du tyrannicide au sein du milieu humaniste français, 1ère moitié du XVe siècleLucie JollivetOn November 23, 1407, the premeditated murder of king Charles’ brother Louis d’Orléans by the henchmen of their cousin John of Burgundy puts the question of the tyrant and tyrannicide at the center of intellectual debates. Indeed, having confessed to ordering the crime, Jean sans Peur goes back on his statement and asks a team of theologians led by the Norman Jean Petit to prepare his defense. This justification is exposed to the public in 1408 and is based upon an argument taken to the jurist Cassius: vim vi repellere licet. Louis was a would-be tyrant, so his murder was both lawful and good. This assertion seems to be an echo of the debates surrounding tyranicide raging amoung the Italian humanists for half a century. Due to the refusal of confession, the royal justice is paralized; therefore the Justification by Jean Petit is all the more shocking. Faced with the inability of justice, Louis’ family is left with no choice but vengeance. The French humanists milieu, which brings together acknowledged and famous humanists such as Nicolas de Clamanges, Laurent de Premierfait and Alain Chartier, and academics tempted by this new intellectual movement, such as Pierre d’Ailly and Jean Gerson, revive the controversy by adapting it to the context: who can be call a tyrant? What is the difference between a tyrant and a legitimate king? Is it lawfull to kill the tyrant as to save the king? The most appropriate answer to these questions must be found because what is at stake is no less than the French kingdom survival.https://journals.openedition.org/medievalista/1641French humanismtyrannicidejusticecivil warmurder
spellingShingle Lucie Jollivet
Les humanistes français, le roi et le tyran. Débats autour du tyrannicide au sein du milieu humaniste français, 1ère moitié du XVe siècle
Medievalista
French humanism
tyrannicide
justice
civil war
murder
title Les humanistes français, le roi et le tyran. Débats autour du tyrannicide au sein du milieu humaniste français, 1ère moitié du XVe siècle
title_full Les humanistes français, le roi et le tyran. Débats autour du tyrannicide au sein du milieu humaniste français, 1ère moitié du XVe siècle
title_fullStr Les humanistes français, le roi et le tyran. Débats autour du tyrannicide au sein du milieu humaniste français, 1ère moitié du XVe siècle
title_full_unstemmed Les humanistes français, le roi et le tyran. Débats autour du tyrannicide au sein du milieu humaniste français, 1ère moitié du XVe siècle
title_short Les humanistes français, le roi et le tyran. Débats autour du tyrannicide au sein du milieu humaniste français, 1ère moitié du XVe siècle
title_sort les humanistes francais le roi et le tyran debats autour du tyrannicide au sein du milieu humaniste francais 1ere moitie du xve siecle
topic French humanism
tyrannicide
justice
civil war
murder
url https://journals.openedition.org/medievalista/1641
work_keys_str_mv AT luciejollivet leshumanistesfrancaisleroietletyrandebatsautourdutyrannicideauseindumilieuhumanistefrancais1eremoitieduxvesiecle