Effect of integrated case-based and problem-based learning on clinical thinking skills of assistant general practitioner trainees: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Case-Based Learning (CBL) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) are popular methods in medical education. However, we do not fully understand how they affect the clinical thinking skills of Assistant General Practitioner (AGP) trainees. This randomised controlled trial aimed to assess...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dingyuan Jiang, Danpei Huang, Hua Wan, Wuliang Fu, Weidong Shi, Jin Li, Huan Zou, Niannan Hou, Qing Li, Nani Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06634-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832594630174048256
author Dingyuan Jiang
Danpei Huang
Hua Wan
Wuliang Fu
Weidong Shi
Jin Li
Huan Zou
Niannan Hou
Qing Li
Nani Li
author_facet Dingyuan Jiang
Danpei Huang
Hua Wan
Wuliang Fu
Weidong Shi
Jin Li
Huan Zou
Niannan Hou
Qing Li
Nani Li
author_sort Dingyuan Jiang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Case-Based Learning (CBL) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) are popular methods in medical education. However, we do not fully understand how they affect the clinical thinking skills of Assistant General Practitioner (AGP) trainees. This randomised controlled trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of combining CBL and PBL and compare their impact on the clinical thinking skills of AGP trainees with that of traditional lecture-based learning (LBL). Methods This randomised controlled trial involved 70 second-year AGP trainees who were randomly assigned to either the CBL-PBL group or the LBL group using a simple randomisation method. The CBL-PBL group engaged in a curriculum that integrated case-based and problem-based learning, whereas the LBL group followed a traditional lecture-based format, as described in the syllabus. To evaluate clinical thinking skills, the participants were assessed using the Clinical Thinking Skills Evaluation Scale (CTSES) and an assistant general practitioner’s professional knowledge test. In addition, this study analysed various factors that influence clinical thinking skills. Results Compared with the LBL group, the CBL-PBL group showed significantly improved performance in all domains assessed by the CTSES in post-course tests (p < 0.001). Specifically, the mean scores for critical, systematic, and evidence-based thinking showed notable improvement in the CBL-PBL group. Additionally, the scores on the professional knowledge test reflected a substantial increase in this group. Furthermore, multiple linear regression analysis showed that both CBL-PBL curriculum performance scores and number of weekly article readings significantly influenced the development of clinical thinking skills. Conclusion The CBL-PBL teaching method positively influenced the clinical thinking skills of assistant general practitioner trainees, with a positive correlation between these skills and course performance in the CBL-PBL curriculum. Trial registration Not applicable.
format Article
id doaj-art-836034c0b0204c9ca477b6d7bc4361f8
institution Kabale University
issn 1472-6920
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Education
spelling doaj-art-836034c0b0204c9ca477b6d7bc4361f82025-01-19T12:27:43ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202025-01-0125111010.1186/s12909-025-06634-9Effect of integrated case-based and problem-based learning on clinical thinking skills of assistant general practitioner trainees: a randomized controlled trialDingyuan Jiang0Danpei Huang1Hua Wan2Wuliang Fu3Weidong Shi4Jin Li5Huan Zou6Niannan Hou7Qing Li8Nani Li9Department of Spinal Surgery, Zhuzhou 331 HospitalDepartment of General Practice, Zhuzhou 331 HospitalDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Zhuzhou 331 HospitalDepartment of Emergency, Zhuzhou 331 HospitalDepartment of Cardiology, Zhuzhou 331 HospitalDepartment of Neurology, Zhuzhou 331 HospitalDepartment of General Surgery, Zhuzhou 331 HospitalDepartment of Pulmonology, Zhuzhou 331 HospitalDepartment of Emergency, Zhuzhou 331 HospitalDepartment of Science and Education, Zhuzhou 331 HospitalAbstract Background Case-Based Learning (CBL) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) are popular methods in medical education. However, we do not fully understand how they affect the clinical thinking skills of Assistant General Practitioner (AGP) trainees. This randomised controlled trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of combining CBL and PBL and compare their impact on the clinical thinking skills of AGP trainees with that of traditional lecture-based learning (LBL). Methods This randomised controlled trial involved 70 second-year AGP trainees who were randomly assigned to either the CBL-PBL group or the LBL group using a simple randomisation method. The CBL-PBL group engaged in a curriculum that integrated case-based and problem-based learning, whereas the LBL group followed a traditional lecture-based format, as described in the syllabus. To evaluate clinical thinking skills, the participants were assessed using the Clinical Thinking Skills Evaluation Scale (CTSES) and an assistant general practitioner’s professional knowledge test. In addition, this study analysed various factors that influence clinical thinking skills. Results Compared with the LBL group, the CBL-PBL group showed significantly improved performance in all domains assessed by the CTSES in post-course tests (p < 0.001). Specifically, the mean scores for critical, systematic, and evidence-based thinking showed notable improvement in the CBL-PBL group. Additionally, the scores on the professional knowledge test reflected a substantial increase in this group. Furthermore, multiple linear regression analysis showed that both CBL-PBL curriculum performance scores and number of weekly article readings significantly influenced the development of clinical thinking skills. Conclusion The CBL-PBL teaching method positively influenced the clinical thinking skills of assistant general practitioner trainees, with a positive correlation between these skills and course performance in the CBL-PBL curriculum. Trial registration Not applicable.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06634-9Clinical thinkingCase-based learningProblem-based learningAssistant general practitioner training
spellingShingle Dingyuan Jiang
Danpei Huang
Hua Wan
Wuliang Fu
Weidong Shi
Jin Li
Huan Zou
Niannan Hou
Qing Li
Nani Li
Effect of integrated case-based and problem-based learning on clinical thinking skills of assistant general practitioner trainees: a randomized controlled trial
BMC Medical Education
Clinical thinking
Case-based learning
Problem-based learning
Assistant general practitioner training
title Effect of integrated case-based and problem-based learning on clinical thinking skills of assistant general practitioner trainees: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Effect of integrated case-based and problem-based learning on clinical thinking skills of assistant general practitioner trainees: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effect of integrated case-based and problem-based learning on clinical thinking skills of assistant general practitioner trainees: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of integrated case-based and problem-based learning on clinical thinking skills of assistant general practitioner trainees: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Effect of integrated case-based and problem-based learning on clinical thinking skills of assistant general practitioner trainees: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effect of integrated case based and problem based learning on clinical thinking skills of assistant general practitioner trainees a randomized controlled trial
topic Clinical thinking
Case-based learning
Problem-based learning
Assistant general practitioner training
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06634-9
work_keys_str_mv AT dingyuanjiang effectofintegratedcasebasedandproblembasedlearningonclinicalthinkingskillsofassistantgeneralpractitionertraineesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT danpeihuang effectofintegratedcasebasedandproblembasedlearningonclinicalthinkingskillsofassistantgeneralpractitionertraineesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT huawan effectofintegratedcasebasedandproblembasedlearningonclinicalthinkingskillsofassistantgeneralpractitionertraineesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wuliangfu effectofintegratedcasebasedandproblembasedlearningonclinicalthinkingskillsofassistantgeneralpractitionertraineesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weidongshi effectofintegratedcasebasedandproblembasedlearningonclinicalthinkingskillsofassistantgeneralpractitionertraineesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jinli effectofintegratedcasebasedandproblembasedlearningonclinicalthinkingskillsofassistantgeneralpractitionertraineesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT huanzou effectofintegratedcasebasedandproblembasedlearningonclinicalthinkingskillsofassistantgeneralpractitionertraineesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT niannanhou effectofintegratedcasebasedandproblembasedlearningonclinicalthinkingskillsofassistantgeneralpractitionertraineesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT qingli effectofintegratedcasebasedandproblembasedlearningonclinicalthinkingskillsofassistantgeneralpractitionertraineesarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nanili effectofintegratedcasebasedandproblembasedlearningonclinicalthinkingskillsofassistantgeneralpractitionertraineesarandomizedcontrolledtrial