Bonding super translucent multilayered monolithic zirconia to different foundation materials: an invitro study

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of bonded substrate, zirconia surface conditioning and the interaction between them on the shear bond strength of monolithic zirconia. Methods Forty-eight monolithic zirconia discs were CAD-CAM fabricated and divided into...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noha Essam, Shaimaa Ahmed Abo-Elfarag, Ahmed Attia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05244-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850134476400623616
author Noha Essam
Shaimaa Ahmed Abo-Elfarag
Ahmed Attia
author_facet Noha Essam
Shaimaa Ahmed Abo-Elfarag
Ahmed Attia
author_sort Noha Essam
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of bonded substrate, zirconia surface conditioning and the interaction between them on the shear bond strength of monolithic zirconia. Methods Forty-eight monolithic zirconia discs were CAD-CAM fabricated and divided into two groups according to surface treatment either as milled and universal primer application (Monobond N, Ivoclar-Vivadent) (P) or sandblasting then universal primer application (Monobond N) (SP). Each main group was further divided into three test groups according to the bonded substrate: dentin (DSP, DP), composite (CSP, CP) or resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) (GSP, GP). Adhesive resin cement (Multilinik automix, Ivoclar-Vivadent) was used for bonding. Specimens were stored in water bath for six months before thermal cycling for 10,000 cycles to mimic intra oral condition. All specimens underwent shear bond strength test (SBS) using a universal testing machine. Two and one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni Post Hoc tests were used for statistical analyses. Results The means ± SD SBS of all test groups were recorded in (MPa). DSP group showed the highest mean SBS (22.65 ± 2.0) followed by DP group (18.61 ± 2.55). Meanwhile, GSP and GP groups showed the lowest mean SBS (4.77 ± 0.09, 4.57 ± 0.73 respectively). Conclusion Sandblasting with priming is recommended as a monolithic zirconia surface treatment method. Dentin is the most reliable substrate followed by composite.
format Article
id doaj-art-8327d412abcc4fe6b08a5201bfac42e6
institution OA Journals
issn 1472-6831
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Oral Health
spelling doaj-art-8327d412abcc4fe6b08a5201bfac42e62025-08-20T02:31:42ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312024-12-0124111110.1186/s12903-024-05244-zBonding super translucent multilayered monolithic zirconia to different foundation materials: an invitro studyNoha Essam0Shaimaa Ahmed Abo-Elfarag1Ahmed Attia2Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura UniversityDepartment of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura UniversityDepartment of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura UniversityAbstract Background The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of bonded substrate, zirconia surface conditioning and the interaction between them on the shear bond strength of monolithic zirconia. Methods Forty-eight monolithic zirconia discs were CAD-CAM fabricated and divided into two groups according to surface treatment either as milled and universal primer application (Monobond N, Ivoclar-Vivadent) (P) or sandblasting then universal primer application (Monobond N) (SP). Each main group was further divided into three test groups according to the bonded substrate: dentin (DSP, DP), composite (CSP, CP) or resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) (GSP, GP). Adhesive resin cement (Multilinik automix, Ivoclar-Vivadent) was used for bonding. Specimens were stored in water bath for six months before thermal cycling for 10,000 cycles to mimic intra oral condition. All specimens underwent shear bond strength test (SBS) using a universal testing machine. Two and one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni Post Hoc tests were used for statistical analyses. Results The means ± SD SBS of all test groups were recorded in (MPa). DSP group showed the highest mean SBS (22.65 ± 2.0) followed by DP group (18.61 ± 2.55). Meanwhile, GSP and GP groups showed the lowest mean SBS (4.77 ± 0.09, 4.57 ± 0.73 respectively). Conclusion Sandblasting with priming is recommended as a monolithic zirconia surface treatment method. Dentin is the most reliable substrate followed by composite.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05244-zSuper translucentZirconiaBond strengthSurface treatmentFoundation materials
spellingShingle Noha Essam
Shaimaa Ahmed Abo-Elfarag
Ahmed Attia
Bonding super translucent multilayered monolithic zirconia to different foundation materials: an invitro study
BMC Oral Health
Super translucent
Zirconia
Bond strength
Surface treatment
Foundation materials
title Bonding super translucent multilayered monolithic zirconia to different foundation materials: an invitro study
title_full Bonding super translucent multilayered monolithic zirconia to different foundation materials: an invitro study
title_fullStr Bonding super translucent multilayered monolithic zirconia to different foundation materials: an invitro study
title_full_unstemmed Bonding super translucent multilayered monolithic zirconia to different foundation materials: an invitro study
title_short Bonding super translucent multilayered monolithic zirconia to different foundation materials: an invitro study
title_sort bonding super translucent multilayered monolithic zirconia to different foundation materials an invitro study
topic Super translucent
Zirconia
Bond strength
Surface treatment
Foundation materials
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05244-z
work_keys_str_mv AT nohaessam bondingsupertranslucentmultilayeredmonolithiczirconiatodifferentfoundationmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT shaimaaahmedaboelfarag bondingsupertranslucentmultilayeredmonolithiczirconiatodifferentfoundationmaterialsaninvitrostudy
AT ahmedattia bondingsupertranslucentmultilayeredmonolithiczirconiatodifferentfoundationmaterialsaninvitrostudy