Escopo de projeto para indexação de revistas científicas
In studies on bibliometrics there is a tendency of famous scientists to obtain more credit than non-famous scientists, for similar works. The same applies to scientific journals, which gets more credit than other works of equivalent or even higher quality. This situation tends to perpetuate a struct...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove
2011-01-01
|
| Series: | EccoS – Revista Científica |
| Online Access: | http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=71521708014 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In studies on bibliometrics there is a tendency of famous scientists to obtain more credit than non-famous scientists, for similar works. The same applies to scientific journals, which gets more credit than other works of equivalent or even higher quality. This situation tends to perpetuate a structure of incentives and policies that end up concentrating the intellectual publication in a few journals, causing greater impact of their issues and changing the way people produce and disseminate science. In this paper is proposed a reflection on the process of qualifying the best journals in the field of social sciences for what is now known as indexing process, exploring the complex taxonomy on the subject. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1517-1949 1983-9278 |