Disparate Intent-to-Treat Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplantation Based on Indication

Background. The impact of indication for pediatric liver transplantation on waitlist and post-transplant mortality outcomes is well known, but the impact on intent-to-treat outcomes has not been investigated. Intent-to-treat survival analysis is important in this study because it is more comprehensi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anna Lang, Cameron Goff, Ashley Montgomery, Jake Lynn, Spoorthi Kamepalli, John Goss, Abbas Rana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/2859384
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832559291648704512
author Anna Lang
Cameron Goff
Ashley Montgomery
Jake Lynn
Spoorthi Kamepalli
John Goss
Abbas Rana
author_facet Anna Lang
Cameron Goff
Ashley Montgomery
Jake Lynn
Spoorthi Kamepalli
John Goss
Abbas Rana
author_sort Anna Lang
collection DOAJ
description Background. The impact of indication for pediatric liver transplantation on waitlist and post-transplant mortality outcomes is well known, but the impact on intent-to-treat outcomes has not been investigated. Intent-to-treat survival analysis is important in this study because it is more comprehensive, combining the transplant outcomes of waitlist mortality, post-transplant mortality, and transplant rate into a single metric to elucidate any disparities in outcomes based on indication. Methods. Cox regression was used to analyze factors impacting survival in 8,002 children listed for liver transplant in the UNOS database between 2006 and 2016. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used to assess differences in waitlist, post-transplant, and intent-to-treat mortality among the top 5 indications of biliary atresia, acute hepatic necrosis, metabolic disorders, hepatoblastoma, and autoimmune cirrhosis. Results. When compared to the reference group of biliary atresia, multivariate analyses showed that every indication was associated with inferior intent-to-treat outcomes except for metabolic disorders. Hepatoblastoma (hazard ratio (HR): 3.73), autoimmune cirrhosis (HR: 1.86), and AHN (HR: 1.77) were associated with significantly increased intent-to-treat mortality. Hepatoblastoma was also associated with increased post-transplant mortality (HR: 3.77) and was the only indication significantly associated with increased waitlist mortality (HR: 6.43). Conclusion. Significant disparity exists across all indications with respect to an increased intent-to-treat mortality, along with an increased post-transplant and waitlist mortality, when compared to the biliary atresia reference group. If further studies validate these findings, a reexamination of the equitable distribution of allografts for transplant may be warranted as well as a focus on disparities in survival after transplant.
format Article
id doaj-art-8252c20006284c2abde8c4e62c7c19ab
institution Kabale University
issn 2291-2797
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
spelling doaj-art-8252c20006284c2abde8c4e62c7c19ab2025-02-03T01:30:26ZengWileyCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology2291-27972023-01-01202310.1155/2023/2859384Disparate Intent-to-Treat Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplantation Based on IndicationAnna Lang0Cameron Goff1Ashley Montgomery2Jake Lynn3Spoorthi Kamepalli4John Goss5Abbas Rana6Department of Student AffairsDepartment of Student AffairsDepartment of Student AffairsDepartment of Student AffairsDepartment of Student AffairsDivision of Abdominal TransplantationDivision of Abdominal TransplantationBackground. The impact of indication for pediatric liver transplantation on waitlist and post-transplant mortality outcomes is well known, but the impact on intent-to-treat outcomes has not been investigated. Intent-to-treat survival analysis is important in this study because it is more comprehensive, combining the transplant outcomes of waitlist mortality, post-transplant mortality, and transplant rate into a single metric to elucidate any disparities in outcomes based on indication. Methods. Cox regression was used to analyze factors impacting survival in 8,002 children listed for liver transplant in the UNOS database between 2006 and 2016. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test were used to assess differences in waitlist, post-transplant, and intent-to-treat mortality among the top 5 indications of biliary atresia, acute hepatic necrosis, metabolic disorders, hepatoblastoma, and autoimmune cirrhosis. Results. When compared to the reference group of biliary atresia, multivariate analyses showed that every indication was associated with inferior intent-to-treat outcomes except for metabolic disorders. Hepatoblastoma (hazard ratio (HR): 3.73), autoimmune cirrhosis (HR: 1.86), and AHN (HR: 1.77) were associated with significantly increased intent-to-treat mortality. Hepatoblastoma was also associated with increased post-transplant mortality (HR: 3.77) and was the only indication significantly associated with increased waitlist mortality (HR: 6.43). Conclusion. Significant disparity exists across all indications with respect to an increased intent-to-treat mortality, along with an increased post-transplant and waitlist mortality, when compared to the biliary atresia reference group. If further studies validate these findings, a reexamination of the equitable distribution of allografts for transplant may be warranted as well as a focus on disparities in survival after transplant.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/2859384
spellingShingle Anna Lang
Cameron Goff
Ashley Montgomery
Jake Lynn
Spoorthi Kamepalli
John Goss
Abbas Rana
Disparate Intent-to-Treat Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplantation Based on Indication
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
title Disparate Intent-to-Treat Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplantation Based on Indication
title_full Disparate Intent-to-Treat Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplantation Based on Indication
title_fullStr Disparate Intent-to-Treat Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplantation Based on Indication
title_full_unstemmed Disparate Intent-to-Treat Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplantation Based on Indication
title_short Disparate Intent-to-Treat Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplantation Based on Indication
title_sort disparate intent to treat outcomes for pediatric liver transplantation based on indication
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/2859384
work_keys_str_mv AT annalang disparateintenttotreatoutcomesforpediatriclivertransplantationbasedonindication
AT camerongoff disparateintenttotreatoutcomesforpediatriclivertransplantationbasedonindication
AT ashleymontgomery disparateintenttotreatoutcomesforpediatriclivertransplantationbasedonindication
AT jakelynn disparateintenttotreatoutcomesforpediatriclivertransplantationbasedonindication
AT spoorthikamepalli disparateintenttotreatoutcomesforpediatriclivertransplantationbasedonindication
AT johngoss disparateintenttotreatoutcomesforpediatriclivertransplantationbasedonindication
AT abbasrana disparateintenttotreatoutcomesforpediatriclivertransplantationbasedonindication