Moral Certainty instead of Moral Objectivity

This paper argues that although Dworkin’s aim of developing a more practical understanding of moral truth is plausible, his attempt to do that while keeping the concept of moral objectivity remains deeply problematic. Because of its opposition to everything subjective, moral objectivity stands in a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aistė Noreikaitė
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius University Press 2024-10-01
Series:Problemos
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/37321
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832593073200168960
author Aistė Noreikaitė
author_facet Aistė Noreikaitė
author_sort Aistė Noreikaitė
collection DOAJ
description This paper argues that although Dworkin’s aim of developing a more practical understanding of moral truth is plausible, his attempt to do that while keeping the concept of moral objectivity remains deeply problematic. Because of its opposition to everything subjective, moral objectivity stands in an inherent conflict with the practical reality that we experience as persons from a first-person perspective; therefore, Dworkin’s attempt to reconceptualize moral objectivity from within a first-person perspective is inherently contradictory. The paper suggests that we should go one step further than Dworkin and give up the concept of moral objectivity altogether. A notion of moral certainty instead of moral objectivity would satisfy Dworkin’s intention of finding a practical conception of moral truth more adequately. A brief preliminary conception of it is developed while invoking the German philosopher Robert Spaemann’s ontology of a person.
format Article
id doaj-art-81a8413b6a1b4450a6c1696cb09ca211
institution Kabale University
issn 1392-1126
2424-6158
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Vilnius University Press
record_format Article
series Problemos
spelling doaj-art-81a8413b6a1b4450a6c1696cb09ca2112025-01-20T18:24:18ZengVilnius University PressProblemos1392-11262424-61582024-10-0110610.15388/Problemos.2024.106.7Moral Certainty instead of Moral ObjectivityAistė Noreikaitė0Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania This paper argues that although Dworkin’s aim of developing a more practical understanding of moral truth is plausible, his attempt to do that while keeping the concept of moral objectivity remains deeply problematic. Because of its opposition to everything subjective, moral objectivity stands in an inherent conflict with the practical reality that we experience as persons from a first-person perspective; therefore, Dworkin’s attempt to reconceptualize moral objectivity from within a first-person perspective is inherently contradictory. The paper suggests that we should go one step further than Dworkin and give up the concept of moral objectivity altogether. A notion of moral certainty instead of moral objectivity would satisfy Dworkin’s intention of finding a practical conception of moral truth more adequately. A brief preliminary conception of it is developed while invoking the German philosopher Robert Spaemann’s ontology of a person. https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/37321Moral objectivitymoral certaintyRobert SpaemannRonald Dworkin
spellingShingle Aistė Noreikaitė
Moral Certainty instead of Moral Objectivity
Problemos
Moral objectivity
moral certainty
Robert Spaemann
Ronald Dworkin
title Moral Certainty instead of Moral Objectivity
title_full Moral Certainty instead of Moral Objectivity
title_fullStr Moral Certainty instead of Moral Objectivity
title_full_unstemmed Moral Certainty instead of Moral Objectivity
title_short Moral Certainty instead of Moral Objectivity
title_sort moral certainty instead of moral objectivity
topic Moral objectivity
moral certainty
Robert Spaemann
Ronald Dworkin
url https://www.journals.vu.lt/problemos/article/view/37321
work_keys_str_mv AT aistenoreikaite moralcertaintyinsteadofmoralobjectivity