Multi-Stage Simulation of Residents’ Disaster Risk Perception and Decision-Making Behavior: An Exploratory Study on Large Language Model-Driven Social–Cognitive Agent Framework

The escalating frequency and complexity of natural disasters highlight the urgent need for deeper insights into how individuals and communities perceive and respond to risk information. Yet, conventional research methods—such as surveys, laboratory experiments, and field observations—often struggle...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xinjie Zhao, Hao Wang, Chengxiao Dai, Jiacheng Tang, Kaixin Deng, Zhihua Zhong, Fanying Kong, Shiyun Wang, So Morikawa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-03-01
Series:Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-8954/13/4/240
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The escalating frequency and complexity of natural disasters highlight the urgent need for deeper insights into how individuals and communities perceive and respond to risk information. Yet, conventional research methods—such as surveys, laboratory experiments, and field observations—often struggle with limited sample sizes, external validity concerns, and difficulties in controlling for confounding variables. These constraints hinder our ability to develop comprehensive models that capture the dynamic, context-sensitive nature of disaster decision-making. To address these challenges, we present a novel multi-stage simulation framework that integrates Large Language Model (LLM)-driven social–cognitive agents with well-established theoretical perspectives from psychology, sociology, and decision science. This framework enables the simulation of three critical phases—information perception, cognitive processing, and decision-making—providing a granular analysis of how demographic attributes, situational factors, and social influences interact to shape behavior under uncertain and evolving disaster conditions. A case study focusing on pre-disaster preventive measures demonstrates its effectiveness. By aligning agent demographics with real-world survey data across 5864 simulated scenarios, we reveal nuanced behavioral patterns closely mirroring human responses, underscoring the potential to overcome longstanding methodological limitations and offer improved ecological validity and flexibility to explore diverse disaster environments and policy interventions. While acknowledging the current constraints, such as the need for enhanced emotional modeling and multimodal inputs, our framework lays a foundation for more nuanced, empirically grounded analyses of risk perception and response patterns. By seamlessly blending theory, advanced LLM capabilities, and empirical alignment strategies, this research not only advances the state of computational social simulation but also provides valuable guidance for developing more context-sensitive and targeted disaster management strategies.
ISSN:2079-8954