Material circularity and environmental quality in the EU: what causes what and where?
Although the green and blue dividends associated with circular economy have been widely advocated, whether circular economy necessarily guarantee environmental quality remains unclear. To provide a more precise insight, in this case for a novel case of all the European Union countries, environmental...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IOP Publishing
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | Environmental Research Communications |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad6b79 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832582956606029824 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrew Adewale Alola Oktay Özkan Gizem Uzuner |
| author_facet | Andrew Adewale Alola Oktay Özkan Gizem Uzuner |
| author_sort | Andrew Adewale Alola |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Although the green and blue dividends associated with circular economy have been widely advocated, whether circular economy necessarily guarantee environmental quality remains unclear. To provide a more precise insight, in this case for a novel case of all the European Union countries, environmental effect of the share of used material resources from the reuse of waste materials is examined over the period 2010–2021. The results reveal that the reuse of waste materials statistically (i) increase CO _2 emissions in most quantiles in Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Greece, Hungary, Lithuania, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, and Slovenia, (ii) mitigate CO _2 emissions in most quantiles in Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, Italy, Portugal, Romania, Slovak Republic, Spain, and Ireland, and (iii) either increasing or reducing CO _2 emissions depending on the quantile of material circularity use rate and CO _2 emissions in Czech Republic, Germany, Luxembourg, Sweden, and Latvia. This result points to a more policy driven approach. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-8058293d75984349b3952111e92e45fa |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2515-7620 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | IOP Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Environmental Research Communications |
| spelling | doaj-art-8058293d75984349b3952111e92e45fa2025-01-29T06:22:33ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Communications2515-76202025-01-017101100710.1088/2515-7620/ad6b79Material circularity and environmental quality in the EU: what causes what and where?Andrew Adewale Alola0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5355-3707Oktay Özkan1Gizem Uzuner2CREDS-Centre for Research on Digitalization and Sustainability, University of Inland Norway , Norway; Faculty of Economics, Administrative and Social Sciences, Nisantasi University , Istanbul, TurkiyeDepartment of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University , Tokat, TurkiyeDepartment of Economics and Data Science, School of Humanities, Natural & Social Sciences, New Uzbekistan University , Tashkent, Uzbekistan; Department of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Economics Administrative and Social Sciences, Istanbul Gelisim University , Istanbul, TurkiyeAlthough the green and blue dividends associated with circular economy have been widely advocated, whether circular economy necessarily guarantee environmental quality remains unclear. To provide a more precise insight, in this case for a novel case of all the European Union countries, environmental effect of the share of used material resources from the reuse of waste materials is examined over the period 2010–2021. The results reveal that the reuse of waste materials statistically (i) increase CO _2 emissions in most quantiles in Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Greece, Hungary, Lithuania, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, and Slovenia, (ii) mitigate CO _2 emissions in most quantiles in Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Estonia, Finland, Italy, Portugal, Romania, Slovak Republic, Spain, and Ireland, and (iii) either increasing or reducing CO _2 emissions depending on the quantile of material circularity use rate and CO _2 emissions in Czech Republic, Germany, Luxembourg, Sweden, and Latvia. This result points to a more policy driven approach.https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad6b79 |
| spellingShingle | Andrew Adewale Alola Oktay Özkan Gizem Uzuner Material circularity and environmental quality in the EU: what causes what and where? Environmental Research Communications |
| title | Material circularity and environmental quality in the EU: what causes what and where? |
| title_full | Material circularity and environmental quality in the EU: what causes what and where? |
| title_fullStr | Material circularity and environmental quality in the EU: what causes what and where? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Material circularity and environmental quality in the EU: what causes what and where? |
| title_short | Material circularity and environmental quality in the EU: what causes what and where? |
| title_sort | material circularity and environmental quality in the eu what causes what and where |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad6b79 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andrewadewalealola materialcircularityandenvironmentalqualityintheeuwhatcauseswhatandwhere AT oktayozkan materialcircularityandenvironmentalqualityintheeuwhatcauseswhatandwhere AT gizemuzuner materialcircularityandenvironmentalqualityintheeuwhatcauseswhatandwhere |