Enhanced Detection of Residual Breast Cancer Post-Excisional Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced MRI with and Without Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of breast MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), in detecting residual lesions in patients with malignancy after excisional biopsy. Methods: From January 2018 to December 2023, 3T breast MRI was performed to assess lesion morphology, residual size,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Han Song Mun, Bong Joo Kang, Sung Hun Kim, Ga Eun Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Tomography
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2379-139X/11/1/10
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832587434904256512
author Han Song Mun
Bong Joo Kang
Sung Hun Kim
Ga Eun Park
author_facet Han Song Mun
Bong Joo Kang
Sung Hun Kim
Ga Eun Park
author_sort Han Song Mun
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of breast MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), in detecting residual lesions in patients with malignancy after excisional biopsy. Methods: From January 2018 to December 2023, 3T breast MRI was performed to assess lesion morphology, residual size, and enhancement kinetics. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured, and the diagnostic outcomes of CE-MRI, CE-MRI with DWI, mammography (MG), and ultrasound (US) were compared with clinical and histopathological data. Results: A total of 152 lesions were analyzed, with 36.2% showing residual malignancy. Both CE-MRI and CE-MRI with DWI effectively identified residual lesions, with significant differences in morphology, size, kinetic patterns, and ADC values (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). CE-MRI with DWI showed a sensitivity of 90.9% and an NPV of 93.6%, compared with 89.1% sensitivity and 92.2% NPV for CE-MRI alone. Sensitivities for MG and US were 57.1% and 38.7%, with NPVs of 64.7% and 59.6%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was highest for CE-MRI with DWI (80.9%), followed by CE-MRI (79.0%), MG (60.3%), and US (59.7%). The AUC for CE-MRI with DWI (0.831) was slightly higher than CE-MRI alone (0.811), though not significant (<i>p</i> = 0.095). AUCs for MG and US were lower at 0.623 and 0.563, with no significant difference between MG and US (<i>p</i> = 0.234). Conclusions: CE-MRI with DWI and CE-MRI alone were comparable and demonstrated excellent performance in discriminating between women with and without residual disease. Integrating CE-MRI with DWI could become a standard protocol for patients with suspected residual malignancy after excisional biopsy.
format Article
id doaj-art-803e1f35adf74645adaa5a09dc6dd083
institution Kabale University
issn 2379-1381
2379-139X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Tomography
spelling doaj-art-803e1f35adf74645adaa5a09dc6dd0832025-01-24T13:50:52ZengMDPI AGTomography2379-13812379-139X2025-01-011111010.3390/tomography11010010Enhanced Detection of Residual Breast Cancer Post-Excisional Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced MRI with and Without Diffusion-Weighted ImagingHan Song Mun0Bong Joo Kang1Sung Hun Kim2Ga Eun Park3Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of KoreaDepartment of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of KoreaObjectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of breast MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), in detecting residual lesions in patients with malignancy after excisional biopsy. Methods: From January 2018 to December 2023, 3T breast MRI was performed to assess lesion morphology, residual size, and enhancement kinetics. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured, and the diagnostic outcomes of CE-MRI, CE-MRI with DWI, mammography (MG), and ultrasound (US) were compared with clinical and histopathological data. Results: A total of 152 lesions were analyzed, with 36.2% showing residual malignancy. Both CE-MRI and CE-MRI with DWI effectively identified residual lesions, with significant differences in morphology, size, kinetic patterns, and ADC values (all <i>p</i> < 0.001). CE-MRI with DWI showed a sensitivity of 90.9% and an NPV of 93.6%, compared with 89.1% sensitivity and 92.2% NPV for CE-MRI alone. Sensitivities for MG and US were 57.1% and 38.7%, with NPVs of 64.7% and 59.6%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy was highest for CE-MRI with DWI (80.9%), followed by CE-MRI (79.0%), MG (60.3%), and US (59.7%). The AUC for CE-MRI with DWI (0.831) was slightly higher than CE-MRI alone (0.811), though not significant (<i>p</i> = 0.095). AUCs for MG and US were lower at 0.623 and 0.563, with no significant difference between MG and US (<i>p</i> = 0.234). Conclusions: CE-MRI with DWI and CE-MRI alone were comparable and demonstrated excellent performance in discriminating between women with and without residual disease. Integrating CE-MRI with DWI could become a standard protocol for patients with suspected residual malignancy after excisional biopsy.https://www.mdpi.com/2379-139X/11/1/10breast cancerexcisional biopsyMRIresidual diseasebreast imaging
spellingShingle Han Song Mun
Bong Joo Kang
Sung Hun Kim
Ga Eun Park
Enhanced Detection of Residual Breast Cancer Post-Excisional Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced MRI with and Without Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
Tomography
breast cancer
excisional biopsy
MRI
residual disease
breast imaging
title Enhanced Detection of Residual Breast Cancer Post-Excisional Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced MRI with and Without Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
title_full Enhanced Detection of Residual Breast Cancer Post-Excisional Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced MRI with and Without Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
title_fullStr Enhanced Detection of Residual Breast Cancer Post-Excisional Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced MRI with and Without Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Enhanced Detection of Residual Breast Cancer Post-Excisional Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced MRI with and Without Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
title_short Enhanced Detection of Residual Breast Cancer Post-Excisional Biopsy: Comparative Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced MRI with and Without Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
title_sort enhanced detection of residual breast cancer post excisional biopsy comparative analysis of contrast enhanced mri with and without diffusion weighted imaging
topic breast cancer
excisional biopsy
MRI
residual disease
breast imaging
url https://www.mdpi.com/2379-139X/11/1/10
work_keys_str_mv AT hansongmun enhanceddetectionofresidualbreastcancerpostexcisionalbiopsycomparativeanalysisofcontrastenhancedmriwithandwithoutdiffusionweightedimaging
AT bongjookang enhanceddetectionofresidualbreastcancerpostexcisionalbiopsycomparativeanalysisofcontrastenhancedmriwithandwithoutdiffusionweightedimaging
AT sunghunkim enhanceddetectionofresidualbreastcancerpostexcisionalbiopsycomparativeanalysisofcontrastenhancedmriwithandwithoutdiffusionweightedimaging
AT gaeunpark enhanceddetectionofresidualbreastcancerpostexcisionalbiopsycomparativeanalysisofcontrastenhancedmriwithandwithoutdiffusionweightedimaging