Treatment Outcomes in Spinal Tumors According to Patients’ Perspectives: A Focus on Indeterminate Spinal Instability

The objective of this study was to analyze treatment approaches and outcomes according to patients’ perspectives for patients with indeterminate spinal instability caused by neoplastic lesions. Data were collected from 31 patients with a total of 147 spinal neoplastic lesions, 29 of whom had lesions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Victoria H. Schimmelpenning, Robin Brugger, Nikki Rommers, Johann Kunst, Martin Jäger, Christoph E. Albers, Helena Milavec
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Current Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/32/1/38
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588707280977920
author Victoria H. Schimmelpenning
Robin Brugger
Nikki Rommers
Johann Kunst
Martin Jäger
Christoph E. Albers
Helena Milavec
author_facet Victoria H. Schimmelpenning
Robin Brugger
Nikki Rommers
Johann Kunst
Martin Jäger
Christoph E. Albers
Helena Milavec
author_sort Victoria H. Schimmelpenning
collection DOAJ
description The objective of this study was to analyze treatment approaches and outcomes according to patients’ perspectives for patients with indeterminate spinal instability caused by neoplastic lesions. Data were collected from 31 patients with a total of 147 spinal neoplastic lesions, 29 of whom had lesions classified as indeterminate. These lesions were divided into two groups: the low indeterminate group (SINS 7–9) and the high indeterminate group (SINS 10–12). Conservative treatment was the primary approach (93%), resulting in improvement in 59% of cases, stability in 22%, and asymptomatic outcomes in 19%. No significant differences in self-reported outcomes were found between surgical and non-surgical treatments (<i>p</i> = 0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.18). Surgery was reserved for patients with severe pain or impending neurological compromise. Our findings suggest that conservative management is a viable option for most patients with indeterminate spinal instability caused by neoplastic lesions, provided pain and neurological stability are adequately controlled.
format Article
id doaj-art-802d2c63ea0a4200a8240e11f63cb6ce
institution Kabale University
issn 1198-0052
1718-7729
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Current Oncology
spelling doaj-art-802d2c63ea0a4200a8240e11f63cb6ce2025-01-24T13:28:27ZengMDPI AGCurrent Oncology1198-00521718-77292025-01-013213810.3390/curroncol32010038Treatment Outcomes in Spinal Tumors According to Patients’ Perspectives: A Focus on Indeterminate Spinal InstabilityVictoria H. Schimmelpenning0Robin Brugger1Nikki Rommers2Johann Kunst3Martin Jäger4Christoph E. Albers5Helena Milavec6Spine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Aarau Cantonal Hospital, 5001 Aarau, SwitzerlandSpine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Aarau Cantonal Hospital, 5001 Aarau, SwitzerlandDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Basel, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, SwitzerlandSpine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Aarau Cantonal Hospital, 5001 Aarau, SwitzerlandSpine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Aarau Cantonal Hospital, 5001 Aarau, SwitzerlandDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, SwitzerlandSpine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Aarau Cantonal Hospital, 5001 Aarau, SwitzerlandThe objective of this study was to analyze treatment approaches and outcomes according to patients’ perspectives for patients with indeterminate spinal instability caused by neoplastic lesions. Data were collected from 31 patients with a total of 147 spinal neoplastic lesions, 29 of whom had lesions classified as indeterminate. These lesions were divided into two groups: the low indeterminate group (SINS 7–9) and the high indeterminate group (SINS 10–12). Conservative treatment was the primary approach (93%), resulting in improvement in 59% of cases, stability in 22%, and asymptomatic outcomes in 19%. No significant differences in self-reported outcomes were found between surgical and non-surgical treatments (<i>p</i> = 0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.18). Surgery was reserved for patients with severe pain or impending neurological compromise. Our findings suggest that conservative management is a viable option for most patients with indeterminate spinal instability caused by neoplastic lesions, provided pain and neurological stability are adequately controlled.https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/32/1/38spinal neoplastic lesionsindeterminate spinal instabilityspinal instability neoplastic score (SINS)tumortreatment outcomes
spellingShingle Victoria H. Schimmelpenning
Robin Brugger
Nikki Rommers
Johann Kunst
Martin Jäger
Christoph E. Albers
Helena Milavec
Treatment Outcomes in Spinal Tumors According to Patients’ Perspectives: A Focus on Indeterminate Spinal Instability
Current Oncology
spinal neoplastic lesions
indeterminate spinal instability
spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS)
tumor
treatment outcomes
title Treatment Outcomes in Spinal Tumors According to Patients’ Perspectives: A Focus on Indeterminate Spinal Instability
title_full Treatment Outcomes in Spinal Tumors According to Patients’ Perspectives: A Focus on Indeterminate Spinal Instability
title_fullStr Treatment Outcomes in Spinal Tumors According to Patients’ Perspectives: A Focus on Indeterminate Spinal Instability
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Outcomes in Spinal Tumors According to Patients’ Perspectives: A Focus on Indeterminate Spinal Instability
title_short Treatment Outcomes in Spinal Tumors According to Patients’ Perspectives: A Focus on Indeterminate Spinal Instability
title_sort treatment outcomes in spinal tumors according to patients perspectives a focus on indeterminate spinal instability
topic spinal neoplastic lesions
indeterminate spinal instability
spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS)
tumor
treatment outcomes
url https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/32/1/38
work_keys_str_mv AT victoriahschimmelpenning treatmentoutcomesinspinaltumorsaccordingtopatientsperspectivesafocusonindeterminatespinalinstability
AT robinbrugger treatmentoutcomesinspinaltumorsaccordingtopatientsperspectivesafocusonindeterminatespinalinstability
AT nikkirommers treatmentoutcomesinspinaltumorsaccordingtopatientsperspectivesafocusonindeterminatespinalinstability
AT johannkunst treatmentoutcomesinspinaltumorsaccordingtopatientsperspectivesafocusonindeterminatespinalinstability
AT martinjager treatmentoutcomesinspinaltumorsaccordingtopatientsperspectivesafocusonindeterminatespinalinstability
AT christophealbers treatmentoutcomesinspinaltumorsaccordingtopatientsperspectivesafocusonindeterminatespinalinstability
AT helenamilavec treatmentoutcomesinspinaltumorsaccordingtopatientsperspectivesafocusonindeterminatespinalinstability