The perception of air pollution and its health risk: a scoping review of measures and methods

Background Although there is increasing awareness of the health risks of air pollution as a global issue, few studies have focused on the methods for assessing individuals’ perceptions of these risks. This scoping review aimed to identify previous research evaluating individuals’ perceptions of air...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zeinab Bahrami, Satomi Sato, Zhesi Yang, Monali Maiti, Paoin Kanawat, Tomohiro Umemura, Kazunari Onishi, Hiroaki Terasaki, Tomoki Nakayama, Yutaka Matsumi, Kayo Ueda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Global Health Action
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2370100
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832096678421725184
author Zeinab Bahrami
Satomi Sato
Zhesi Yang
Monali Maiti
Paoin Kanawat
Tomohiro Umemura
Kazunari Onishi
Hiroaki Terasaki
Tomoki Nakayama
Yutaka Matsumi
Kayo Ueda
author_facet Zeinab Bahrami
Satomi Sato
Zhesi Yang
Monali Maiti
Paoin Kanawat
Tomohiro Umemura
Kazunari Onishi
Hiroaki Terasaki
Tomoki Nakayama
Yutaka Matsumi
Kayo Ueda
author_sort Zeinab Bahrami
collection DOAJ
description Background Although there is increasing awareness of the health risks of air pollution as a global issue, few studies have focused on the methods for assessing individuals’ perceptions of these risks. This scoping review aimed to identify previous research evaluating individuals’ perceptions of air pollution and its health effects, and to explore the measurement of perceptions, as a key resource for health behaviour. Methods The review followed the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley. PubMed and Web of Science were searched. After initial and full-text screening, we further selected studies with standardised scales that had previously been tested for reliability and validity in assessing awareness and perceptions. Results After full-text screening, 95 studies were identified. ‘Perception/awareness of air quality’ was often measured, as well as ‘Perception of health risk.’ Only nine studies (9.5%) used validated scaled questionnaires. There was considerable variation in the scales used to measure the multiple dimensions of risk perception for air pollution. Conclusion Few studies used structured scales to quantify individuals’ perceptions, limiting comparisons among studies. Standardised methods for measuring health risk perception are needed.
format Article
id doaj-art-7fdc9fc0221c436b867926d604811c09
institution Kabale University
issn 1654-9880
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Global Health Action
spelling doaj-art-7fdc9fc0221c436b867926d604811c092025-02-05T12:46:14ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGlobal Health Action1654-98802024-12-0117110.1080/16549716.2024.23701002370100The perception of air pollution and its health risk: a scoping review of measures and methodsZeinab Bahrami0Satomi Sato1Zhesi Yang2Monali Maiti3Paoin Kanawat4Tomohiro Umemura5Kazunari Onishi6Hiroaki Terasaki7Tomoki Nakayama8Yutaka Matsumi9Kayo Ueda10Research Institute for Humanity and NatureSt Lukes International UniversityResearch Institute for Humanity and NatureR.B.V.R.R. Women’s CollegeKyoto UniversityResearch Institute for Humanity and NatureResearch Institute for Humanity and NatureResearch Institute for Humanity and NatureResearch Institute for Humanity and NatureResearch Institute for Humanity and NatureResearch Institute for Humanity and NatureBackground Although there is increasing awareness of the health risks of air pollution as a global issue, few studies have focused on the methods for assessing individuals’ perceptions of these risks. This scoping review aimed to identify previous research evaluating individuals’ perceptions of air pollution and its health effects, and to explore the measurement of perceptions, as a key resource for health behaviour. Methods The review followed the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley. PubMed and Web of Science were searched. After initial and full-text screening, we further selected studies with standardised scales that had previously been tested for reliability and validity in assessing awareness and perceptions. Results After full-text screening, 95 studies were identified. ‘Perception/awareness of air quality’ was often measured, as well as ‘Perception of health risk.’ Only nine studies (9.5%) used validated scaled questionnaires. There was considerable variation in the scales used to measure the multiple dimensions of risk perception for air pollution. Conclusion Few studies used structured scales to quantify individuals’ perceptions, limiting comparisons among studies. Standardised methods for measuring health risk perception are needed.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2370100air pollutionair qualityhealth riskhealth risk perceptionstandardised scalesawareness
spellingShingle Zeinab Bahrami
Satomi Sato
Zhesi Yang
Monali Maiti
Paoin Kanawat
Tomohiro Umemura
Kazunari Onishi
Hiroaki Terasaki
Tomoki Nakayama
Yutaka Matsumi
Kayo Ueda
The perception of air pollution and its health risk: a scoping review of measures and methods
Global Health Action
air pollution
air quality
health risk
health risk perception
standardised scales
awareness
title The perception of air pollution and its health risk: a scoping review of measures and methods
title_full The perception of air pollution and its health risk: a scoping review of measures and methods
title_fullStr The perception of air pollution and its health risk: a scoping review of measures and methods
title_full_unstemmed The perception of air pollution and its health risk: a scoping review of measures and methods
title_short The perception of air pollution and its health risk: a scoping review of measures and methods
title_sort perception of air pollution and its health risk a scoping review of measures and methods
topic air pollution
air quality
health risk
health risk perception
standardised scales
awareness
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2370100
work_keys_str_mv AT zeinabbahrami theperceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT satomisato theperceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT zhesiyang theperceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT monalimaiti theperceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT paoinkanawat theperceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT tomohiroumemura theperceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT kazunarionishi theperceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT hiroakiterasaki theperceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT tomokinakayama theperceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT yutakamatsumi theperceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT kayoueda theperceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT zeinabbahrami perceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT satomisato perceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT zhesiyang perceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT monalimaiti perceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT paoinkanawat perceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT tomohiroumemura perceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT kazunarionishi perceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT hiroakiterasaki perceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT tomokinakayama perceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT yutakamatsumi perceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods
AT kayoueda perceptionofairpollutionanditshealthriskascopingreviewofmeasuresandmethods