The impact of pelvic floor contraction on urethral mobility and urogenital hiatus size in pelvic floor ultrasound

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of pelvic floor contraction on urethral mobility and the size of the urogenital hiatus, as well as to compare two ultrasonographic approaches for the assessment of urethral mobility: transperineal with a transabdominal probe and transvestibular with a tr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dobek-Brylińska Marta, Wlaźlak Edyta, Wlaźlak Wiktor, Krakowiak Jan, Wróbel Andrzej, Surkont Grzegorz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2025-02-01
Series:Journal of Ultrasonography
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2025.0005
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850280756760281088
author Dobek-Brylińska Marta
Wlaźlak Edyta
Wlaźlak Wiktor
Krakowiak Jan
Wróbel Andrzej
Surkont Grzegorz
author_facet Dobek-Brylińska Marta
Wlaźlak Edyta
Wlaźlak Wiktor
Krakowiak Jan
Wróbel Andrzej
Surkont Grzegorz
author_sort Dobek-Brylińska Marta
collection DOAJ
description The aim of the study was to assess the effect of pelvic floor contraction on urethral mobility and the size of the urogenital hiatus, as well as to compare two ultrasonographic approaches for the assessment of urethral mobility: transperineal with a transabdominal probe and transvestibular with a transvaginal transducer.
format Article
id doaj-art-7fc7f9c5f3eb4b25a21e2e8c06e4b56d
institution OA Journals
issn 2451-070X
language English
publishDate 2025-02-01
publisher Sciendo
record_format Article
series Journal of Ultrasonography
spelling doaj-art-7fc7f9c5f3eb4b25a21e2e8c06e4b56d2025-08-20T01:48:37ZengSciendoJournal of Ultrasonography2451-070X2025-02-012510057157710.15557/jou.2025.0005The impact of pelvic floor contraction on urethral mobility and urogenital hiatus size in pelvic floor ultrasoundDobek-Brylińska MartaWlaźlak EdytaWlaźlak Wiktor0Krakowiak Jan1Wróbel Andrzej2Surkont Grzegorz3Clinic of Operative and Oncologic Gynecology, 1st Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Lodz, PolandDepartment of Social Medicine, Chair of Social and Preventive Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Poland2nd Chair and Department of Gynecology, Medical University in Lublin, PolandClinic of Operative and Oncologic Gynecology, 1st Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Lodz, PolandThe aim of the study was to assess the effect of pelvic floor contraction on urethral mobility and the size of the urogenital hiatus, as well as to compare two ultrasonographic approaches for the assessment of urethral mobility: transperineal with a transabdominal probe and transvestibular with a transvaginal transducer.https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2025.0005pelvic floor ultrasoundpelvic floor muscle contractionurethral mobilityurogenital hiatus
spellingShingle Dobek-Brylińska Marta
Wlaźlak Edyta
Wlaźlak Wiktor
Krakowiak Jan
Wróbel Andrzej
Surkont Grzegorz
The impact of pelvic floor contraction on urethral mobility and urogenital hiatus size in pelvic floor ultrasound
Journal of Ultrasonography
pelvic floor ultrasound
pelvic floor muscle contraction
urethral mobility
urogenital hiatus
title The impact of pelvic floor contraction on urethral mobility and urogenital hiatus size in pelvic floor ultrasound
title_full The impact of pelvic floor contraction on urethral mobility and urogenital hiatus size in pelvic floor ultrasound
title_fullStr The impact of pelvic floor contraction on urethral mobility and urogenital hiatus size in pelvic floor ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed The impact of pelvic floor contraction on urethral mobility and urogenital hiatus size in pelvic floor ultrasound
title_short The impact of pelvic floor contraction on urethral mobility and urogenital hiatus size in pelvic floor ultrasound
title_sort impact of pelvic floor contraction on urethral mobility and urogenital hiatus size in pelvic floor ultrasound
topic pelvic floor ultrasound
pelvic floor muscle contraction
urethral mobility
urogenital hiatus
url https://doi.org/10.15557/jou.2025.0005
work_keys_str_mv AT dobekbrylinskamarta theimpactofpelvicfloorcontractiononurethralmobilityandurogenitalhiatussizeinpelvicfloorultrasound
AT wlazlakedyta theimpactofpelvicfloorcontractiononurethralmobilityandurogenitalhiatussizeinpelvicfloorultrasound
AT wlazlakwiktor theimpactofpelvicfloorcontractiononurethralmobilityandurogenitalhiatussizeinpelvicfloorultrasound
AT krakowiakjan theimpactofpelvicfloorcontractiononurethralmobilityandurogenitalhiatussizeinpelvicfloorultrasound
AT wrobelandrzej theimpactofpelvicfloorcontractiononurethralmobilityandurogenitalhiatussizeinpelvicfloorultrasound
AT surkontgrzegorz theimpactofpelvicfloorcontractiononurethralmobilityandurogenitalhiatussizeinpelvicfloorultrasound
AT dobekbrylinskamarta impactofpelvicfloorcontractiononurethralmobilityandurogenitalhiatussizeinpelvicfloorultrasound
AT wlazlakedyta impactofpelvicfloorcontractiononurethralmobilityandurogenitalhiatussizeinpelvicfloorultrasound
AT wlazlakwiktor impactofpelvicfloorcontractiononurethralmobilityandurogenitalhiatussizeinpelvicfloorultrasound
AT krakowiakjan impactofpelvicfloorcontractiononurethralmobilityandurogenitalhiatussizeinpelvicfloorultrasound
AT wrobelandrzej impactofpelvicfloorcontractiononurethralmobilityandurogenitalhiatussizeinpelvicfloorultrasound
AT surkontgrzegorz impactofpelvicfloorcontractiononurethralmobilityandurogenitalhiatussizeinpelvicfloorultrasound