Reducing Judicial Inconsistency through AI: A Review of Legal Judgement Prediction Models
Ensuring equitable sentencing is a fundamental objective of the judicial system. However, disparities in law enforcement standards, policies, and personnel competence across regions can lead to divergent sentencing outcomes for similar cases. This inconsistency undermines the integrity of justice an...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Wu Yifan |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2025-01-01
|
Series: | ITM Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://www.itm-conferences.org/articles/itmconf/pdf/2025/01/itmconf_dai2024_02009.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Refining the prediction of user satisfaction on chat-based AI applications with unsupervised filtering of rating text inconsistencies
by: Hae Sun Jung, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Legal Linguistics of Judicial Educational Activities
by: О. V. Minchenko
Published: (2019-05-01) -
Exploring condition in which people accept AI over human judgements on justified defection
by: Hitoshi Yamamoto, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
International legal framework for the regulation of judicial immunity
by: S. O. Demchenko
Published: (2024-12-01) -
The structure of aesthetic judgements
by: V. Nell
Published: (2022-11-01)