Settlement of Dispute on Murabahah Financing with Default Customer
This research is an Islamic law research that discusses the settlement of murabahah financing disputes with defaulting customers with a case study on the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 649 K/AG Year 2017. The research model (mode of inquiry) of this study is qualitative. The prel...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Arabic |
| Published: |
Jurusan Syariah Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ua/article/view/17391 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832570143662669824 |
|---|---|
| author | Nawir Yuslem Mhd. Yadhi Harahap Darmansyah Hasibuan |
| author_facet | Nawir Yuslem Mhd. Yadhi Harahap Darmansyah Hasibuan |
| author_sort | Nawir Yuslem |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This research is an Islamic law research that discusses the settlement of murabahah financing disputes with defaulting customers with a case study on the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 649 K/AG Year 2017. The research model (mode of inquiry) of this study is qualitative. The preliminary step in this research is a conceptual approach with normative legal research methods. This study uses the theory of mashlahah: applicative theory is used in analyzing the data of this study and in the end this study shows that there is still a deviation between the provisions of murabahah financing and the concept of fiqh but to avoid this deviation, the wakalah system is made. The Supreme Court's decision Number 649 K/AG/2017 does not reflect a fully progressive decision, for the bank and also for the customer, the decision has not received a value of benefit, because the Supreme Court judge does not give a time limit to customers who are considered unable to make payments in accordance with the agreement (default) to reschedule (rescheduling), in the absence of such a time limit, provides an opportunity for customers who are in default to prolong the delay in payment so that this can be detrimental to the bank. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-7eefd89753d8428baa38014933e5849c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2597-6168 2597-6176 |
| language | Arabic |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | Jurusan Syariah Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam |
| spelling | doaj-art-7eefd89753d8428baa38014933e5849c2025-02-02T16:31:29ZaraJurusan Syariah Fakultas Agama Islam Universitas Islam Sultan Agung SemarangUlul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam2597-61682597-61762022-01-0151576710.30659/jua.v5i1.173916356Settlement of Dispute on Murabahah Financing with Default CustomerNawir Yuslem0Mhd. Yadhi Harahap1Darmansyah Hasibuan2Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera UtaraUniversitas Islam Negeri Sumatera UtaraUniversitas Islam Negeri Sumatera UtaraThis research is an Islamic law research that discusses the settlement of murabahah financing disputes with defaulting customers with a case study on the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 649 K/AG Year 2017. The research model (mode of inquiry) of this study is qualitative. The preliminary step in this research is a conceptual approach with normative legal research methods. This study uses the theory of mashlahah: applicative theory is used in analyzing the data of this study and in the end this study shows that there is still a deviation between the provisions of murabahah financing and the concept of fiqh but to avoid this deviation, the wakalah system is made. The Supreme Court's decision Number 649 K/AG/2017 does not reflect a fully progressive decision, for the bank and also for the customer, the decision has not received a value of benefit, because the Supreme Court judge does not give a time limit to customers who are considered unable to make payments in accordance with the agreement (default) to reschedule (rescheduling), in the absence of such a time limit, provides an opportunity for customers who are in default to prolong the delay in payment so that this can be detrimental to the bank.http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ua/article/view/17391murabaha, wanprestasi, supreme court decision |
| spellingShingle | Nawir Yuslem Mhd. Yadhi Harahap Darmansyah Hasibuan Settlement of Dispute on Murabahah Financing with Default Customer Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam murabaha, wanprestasi, supreme court decision |
| title | Settlement of Dispute on Murabahah Financing with Default Customer |
| title_full | Settlement of Dispute on Murabahah Financing with Default Customer |
| title_fullStr | Settlement of Dispute on Murabahah Financing with Default Customer |
| title_full_unstemmed | Settlement of Dispute on Murabahah Financing with Default Customer |
| title_short | Settlement of Dispute on Murabahah Financing with Default Customer |
| title_sort | settlement of dispute on murabahah financing with default customer |
| topic | murabaha, wanprestasi, supreme court decision |
| url | http://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ua/article/view/17391 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nawiryuslem settlementofdisputeonmurabahahfinancingwithdefaultcustomer AT mhdyadhiharahap settlementofdisputeonmurabahahfinancingwithdefaultcustomer AT darmansyahhasibuan settlementofdisputeonmurabahahfinancingwithdefaultcustomer |