Effectiveness of different intervention designs for improving physical activity in adults with cardiometabolic conditions over time: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Abstract Background An active lifestyle can lessen the risk of cardiometabolic conditions and improve overall life quality. To support lifestyle change and help healthcare providers deliver optimal physical activity interventions, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of four different physical acti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander Hodkinson, Harsini Raaja Sulochana, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Charles Adeniji, Harm van Marwijk, Brian McMillan, Peter Bower, Maria Panagioti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:BMC Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04240-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849235092883374080
author Alexander Hodkinson
Harsini Raaja Sulochana
Evangelos Kontopantelis
Charles Adeniji
Harm van Marwijk
Brian McMillan
Peter Bower
Maria Panagioti
author_facet Alexander Hodkinson
Harsini Raaja Sulochana
Evangelos Kontopantelis
Charles Adeniji
Harm van Marwijk
Brian McMillan
Peter Bower
Maria Panagioti
author_sort Alexander Hodkinson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background An active lifestyle can lessen the risk of cardiometabolic conditions and improve overall life quality. To support lifestyle change and help healthcare providers deliver optimal physical activity interventions, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of four different physical activity intervention designs (education, behaviour-change, motivational/goal-setting and multi-component) against usual care/minimal intervention in increasing physical activity among adults with cardiometabolic conditions. Methods A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted. Four databases were searched (January 2000–February 2025). Primary outcomes: steps per day, moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and combined physical activity. Secondary outcomes: sedentary time, HbA1c, BMI, weight loss, SBP, DBP, cholesterol, LDL-C and HDL-C. Steps per day were analysed via time-course model-based meta-analysis. Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis estimated mean differences (MD)/standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Evidence quality was assessed using CINeMA. Results Sixty-two trials comprising 8952 participants were included, 51 were analysed in the meta-analysis. Behaviour-change (MD = 3287, 95% CrI 1576 to 4997 steps per day), multi-component (MD = 2939, 95% CrI 1714 to 4164), education (MD = 2054, 95% CrI 369 to 3740) and motivational/goal-setting (MD = 1344, 95% CrI 243 to 2445) interventions were significantly more effective than usual care in increasing steps per day. Overall, combined physical activity interventions excluding minimal interventions and when compared to usual care only, increased steps per day significantly from baseline by 143 (95% CrI 114 to 182; median 18 weeks), with the highest number of steps per day predicted at around 75 weeks from baseline (MD = 738, 95% CrI 581 to 893). Only multi-component interventions were consistently found to significantly increase physical activity across all primary measures—steps per day, MVPA and combined physical activity—compared to usual care or minimal care. In terms of secondary outcomes, motivational (MD = − 0.28%, CrI = − 0.46 to − 0.10%) and multi-component interventions were associated with significant HbA1c reductions (MD = − 0.24%, CrI = − 0.47 to − 0.02%) compared to usual care; no significant effects were found on other secondary outcomes. Conclusions Multi-component interventions were most effective at improving physical activity levels among people with cardiometabolic conditions. The crucial next step for patients, clinicians and policymakers is to enhance the understanding of how to tailor and implement these interventions effectively for sustained improvements in long-term physical activity levels. Trial registration PROSPERO number CRD42023405306.
format Article
id doaj-art-7ed044b307a14511bc62a09f5bfc11e7
institution Kabale University
issn 1741-7015
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medicine
spelling doaj-art-7ed044b307a14511bc62a09f5bfc11e72025-08-20T04:02:55ZengBMCBMC Medicine1741-70152025-07-0123111510.1186/s12916-025-04240-6Effectiveness of different intervention designs for improving physical activity in adults with cardiometabolic conditions over time: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsAlexander Hodkinson0Harsini Raaja Sulochana1Evangelos Kontopantelis2Charles Adeniji3Harm van Marwijk4Brian McMillan5Peter Bower6Maria Panagioti7Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of ManchesterDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of ManchesterDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of ManchesterDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of ManchesterDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of BrightonDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of ManchesterDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of ManchesterDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of ManchesterAbstract Background An active lifestyle can lessen the risk of cardiometabolic conditions and improve overall life quality. To support lifestyle change and help healthcare providers deliver optimal physical activity interventions, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of four different physical activity intervention designs (education, behaviour-change, motivational/goal-setting and multi-component) against usual care/minimal intervention in increasing physical activity among adults with cardiometabolic conditions. Methods A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted. Four databases were searched (January 2000–February 2025). Primary outcomes: steps per day, moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and combined physical activity. Secondary outcomes: sedentary time, HbA1c, BMI, weight loss, SBP, DBP, cholesterol, LDL-C and HDL-C. Steps per day were analysed via time-course model-based meta-analysis. Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis estimated mean differences (MD)/standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs). Evidence quality was assessed using CINeMA. Results Sixty-two trials comprising 8952 participants were included, 51 were analysed in the meta-analysis. Behaviour-change (MD = 3287, 95% CrI 1576 to 4997 steps per day), multi-component (MD = 2939, 95% CrI 1714 to 4164), education (MD = 2054, 95% CrI 369 to 3740) and motivational/goal-setting (MD = 1344, 95% CrI 243 to 2445) interventions were significantly more effective than usual care in increasing steps per day. Overall, combined physical activity interventions excluding minimal interventions and when compared to usual care only, increased steps per day significantly from baseline by 143 (95% CrI 114 to 182; median 18 weeks), with the highest number of steps per day predicted at around 75 weeks from baseline (MD = 738, 95% CrI 581 to 893). Only multi-component interventions were consistently found to significantly increase physical activity across all primary measures—steps per day, MVPA and combined physical activity—compared to usual care or minimal care. In terms of secondary outcomes, motivational (MD = − 0.28%, CrI = − 0.46 to − 0.10%) and multi-component interventions were associated with significant HbA1c reductions (MD = − 0.24%, CrI = − 0.47 to − 0.02%) compared to usual care; no significant effects were found on other secondary outcomes. Conclusions Multi-component interventions were most effective at improving physical activity levels among people with cardiometabolic conditions. The crucial next step for patients, clinicians and policymakers is to enhance the understanding of how to tailor and implement these interventions effectively for sustained improvements in long-term physical activity levels. Trial registration PROSPERO number CRD42023405306.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04240-6Network meta-analysisPhysical activityIntervention designSystematic reviewCardiometabolic conditions
spellingShingle Alexander Hodkinson
Harsini Raaja Sulochana
Evangelos Kontopantelis
Charles Adeniji
Harm van Marwijk
Brian McMillan
Peter Bower
Maria Panagioti
Effectiveness of different intervention designs for improving physical activity in adults with cardiometabolic conditions over time: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
BMC Medicine
Network meta-analysis
Physical activity
Intervention design
Systematic review
Cardiometabolic conditions
title Effectiveness of different intervention designs for improving physical activity in adults with cardiometabolic conditions over time: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Effectiveness of different intervention designs for improving physical activity in adults with cardiometabolic conditions over time: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Effectiveness of different intervention designs for improving physical activity in adults with cardiometabolic conditions over time: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of different intervention designs for improving physical activity in adults with cardiometabolic conditions over time: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Effectiveness of different intervention designs for improving physical activity in adults with cardiometabolic conditions over time: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort effectiveness of different intervention designs for improving physical activity in adults with cardiometabolic conditions over time a systematic review and network meta analysis of randomised controlled trials
topic Network meta-analysis
Physical activity
Intervention design
Systematic review
Cardiometabolic conditions
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04240-6
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderhodkinson effectivenessofdifferentinterventiondesignsforimprovingphysicalactivityinadultswithcardiometabolicconditionsovertimeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT harsiniraajasulochana effectivenessofdifferentinterventiondesignsforimprovingphysicalactivityinadultswithcardiometabolicconditionsovertimeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT evangeloskontopantelis effectivenessofdifferentinterventiondesignsforimprovingphysicalactivityinadultswithcardiometabolicconditionsovertimeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT charlesadeniji effectivenessofdifferentinterventiondesignsforimprovingphysicalactivityinadultswithcardiometabolicconditionsovertimeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT harmvanmarwijk effectivenessofdifferentinterventiondesignsforimprovingphysicalactivityinadultswithcardiometabolicconditionsovertimeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT brianmcmillan effectivenessofdifferentinterventiondesignsforimprovingphysicalactivityinadultswithcardiometabolicconditionsovertimeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT peterbower effectivenessofdifferentinterventiondesignsforimprovingphysicalactivityinadultswithcardiometabolicconditionsovertimeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT mariapanagioti effectivenessofdifferentinterventiondesignsforimprovingphysicalactivityinadultswithcardiometabolicconditionsovertimeasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials